Do you think The Witcher series is "mature?"

Recommended Videos

BloatedGuppy

New member
Feb 3, 2010
9,572
0
0
Akratus said:
Sure the acting is bad, but I was refering to the writing.
As was I.

Dialogue is difficult to write well. It's not enough to type up a big exposition monologue and then have a character vomit it out, that sounds terrible. You want to capture the cadence and pace of how people actually talk.

Not only is that little speech by Geralt incredibly stiff, it's also completely out of character for a guy who spends the vast majority of both games delivering short lines in a monosyllabic deadpan.

So, is it a terribly written piece of text? No. Is it "good dialogue"? Dear god, no.
 

Monkey Revenge

New member
Apr 1, 2010
8
0
0
I personally LOVE the Witcher 2 and think its a great game? But is it Mature? Who knows? Why is it that gaming is the only entertainment medium obsessed with whether or not something is "mature". Ive never gone to a movie or listened to a long and thought "Wow this is really mature". If you define mature it means (at least as an adjective)

1. complete in natural growth or development, as plant and animal forms: a mature rose bush.
2. ripe, as fruit, or fully aged, as cheese or wine.
3. fully developed in body or mind, as a person: a mature woman.
4. pertaining to or characteristic of full development: a mature appearance; fruit with a mature softness.
5. completed, perfected, or elaborated in full by the mind: mature plans.


None of these help to describe an entertainment medium, and shouldn't be used to describe one either. I think its use in the ESRB was a mistake and wether or not you think a game is actually mature depends on your own definition of mature....since you aren't using it verbatim more as a poetic license, and thus will have a different answer from person to person.
 

PedroSteckecilo

Mexican Fugitive
Feb 7, 2008
6,732
0
0
SmashLovesTitanQuest said:
Saviordd1 said:
aren't we supposed to be loyal to Triss?
No.

In fact, you'd be an idiot to be loyal and trust Triss in either Witcher game, since she does a fair bit of lying and backstabbing in both.
I dunno, my entire Witcher 2 play-through could basically be described as a Triss Rescue Mission, as I really let down a certain character in Chapter 3 to rescue Triss (a really good test of where your loyalties lie I found).

And to the "loyal to Triss" question... it's all about player choice in the end, you can perceive the relationship between Geralt and Triss however you'd like and act on that whether it's purely sexual, romantic, antagonistic... whatever.

Haven't quite managed to make it very far in The Witcher 1 (horrible combat, just horrible) so I'm not entirely sure how the misogyny feels in that one but in Witcher 2 I got the feeling that it's a Misogynistic Universe but you, as the player, have the option to act against it if you so wish, and the misogyny is depicted as pretty much horrid throughout the entire game so I'm a little more forgiving there.
 

Jayemsal

New member
Dec 28, 2012
209
0
0
endtherapture said:
Been lurking on the Dragon Age Bioware forums today and come across an incredible hatred of The Witcher 2:
Also, calling Witcher series "mature" is like calling XBox Live a civilized discussion platform.
A lot of people appear to have this problem with TW series. Are they just Dragon Age fanboys or is it a legitimate argument?

I found the game pretty mature. It dealt with a mature high politics plot as well as a personal one with realistic and complicated romances, friendships and working relationships. This was across a backdrop of a pseudo realistic medieval fantasy storyline, filled with rape, mysogeny, racism etc. It's no less mature than Game of Thrones, which isn't called out as being immature. Sure it has tits but that's no less mature than the characters in Dragon Age having sex in their underwear?

Your opinions?
The Witcher is mature strictly by a 13 year old's opinion on what "mature" is.
 

Frostbite3789

New member
Jul 12, 2010
1,778
0
0
Moonlight Butterfly said:
This is the problem. People don't listen they just see what they want to.
I don't want to use the word 'hypocritical' but it applies so readily here as this is what you've been doing the entire thread. Me saying Skyrim is full of non-entities you took as some attack on you and your agenda.
 

Moonlight Butterfly

Be the Leaf
Mar 16, 2011
6,157
0
0
Frostbite3789 said:
Moonlight Butterfly said:
This is the problem. People don't listen they just see what they want to.
I don't want to use the word 'hypocritical' but it applies so readily here as this is what you've been doing the entire thread. Me saying Skyrim is full of non-entities you took as some attack on you and your agenda.
Whatever...I wasn't saying that Skyrim was better than your precious witcher so there was no reason to bring that up at all.

You can see why I got confused when you weren't even saying anything about what we were discussing. You just got annoyed that I was saying Skyrim was better.
 

Frostbite3789

New member
Jul 12, 2010
1,778
0
0
Moonlight Butterfly said:
Frostbite3789 said:
Moonlight Butterfly said:
This is the problem. People don't listen they just see what they want to.
I don't want to use the word 'hypocritical' but it applies so readily here as this is what you've been doing the entire thread. Me saying Skyrim is full of non-entities you took as some attack on you and your agenda.
Whatever...I wasn't saying that Skyrim was better than your precious witcher so there was no reason to bring that up at all.

You can see why I got confused when you weren't even saying anything about what we were discussing. You just got annoyed that I was saying Skyrim was better.
You're talking to someone who sank over 100 hours into Skyrim. And didn't enjoy the first Witcher game that much. You assume way too much. And you know what happens when you assume, right?

But comparing Skyrim and The Witcher series is downright foolish. And you did it. One is a story and character driven experience. The other is a sandbox in which you murder dragons and dungeons overflowing with draugr. Skyrim's narrative is non-existant at best and godawful at worst. And the atmosphere really isn't there. I never felt immersed in that world like I did playing The Witcher 2.

I got married in Skyrim but didn't feel half the attachment to my in game husband or wife in Skyrim as I did to Ves and I didn't even take the option to sleep with her.

Edit: Getting married in Skyrim was basically like opening up a more convenient shop to dump vendor trash.
 

Moonlight Butterfly

Be the Leaf
Mar 16, 2011
6,157
0
0
Frostbite3789 said:
Yeah but I wasn't even comparing them that way...

The fact is Skyrim present women as more equal to men than the Witcher 1. Depth or no you can't really dispute that. It has absolutely nothing to do with what we were talking about.
 

NightmareExpress

New member
Dec 31, 2012
546
0
0
I certainly think it tries to be mature.
But I think at times it tries too hard. Got some of those "edgy for the sake of being edgy" vibes at points.
So I guess that would put it at...Mature lite?
 

Frostbite3789

New member
Jul 12, 2010
1,778
0
0
Moonlight Butterfly said:
Frostbite3789 said:
Yeah but I wasn't even comparing them that way...

The fact is Skyrim present women as more equal to men than the Witcher 1. Depth or no you can't really dispute that. It has absolutely nothing to do with what we were talking about.
That's kind of my point, in Skyrim it doesn't matter. Any NPC could be any gender and it wouldn't change a thing. Because none of them have personalities. That's not equality. That's some 1984-esque future where people don't exist, and it's just husks.
 

Moonlight Butterfly

Be the Leaf
Mar 16, 2011
6,157
0
0
Frostbite3789 said:
Moonlight Butterfly said:
Frostbite3789 said:
Yeah but I wasn't even comparing them that way...

The fact is Skyrim present women as more equal to men than the Witcher 1. Depth or no you can't really dispute that. It has absolutely nothing to do with what we were talking about.
That's kind of my point, in Skyrim it doesn't matter. Any NPC could be any gender and it wouldn't change a thing. Because none of them have personalities. That's not equality. That's some 1984-esque future where people don't exist, and it's just husks.
So the alternative just HAS to be that women are oppressed...seems legit.

Also I don't think Skyrim is as bad as you are making it out to be.
 

Evil Top Hat

New member
May 21, 2011
579
0
0
Not the slightest bit. I could only manage to get through 2 hours of the first game before giving up, but in that time the game shoved in my face copious amounts of completely unnecessary, out of place sex scenes and characters with no personality in skimpy outfits that existed for their own sake. It's approach to sex was token and juvenile.

Racism is about as original in RPGs as the level up mechanic these days, so I wasn't exactly blown away by the odd character that would occasionally say "your mother sucks dwarf cock" either. I'm not shitting you by the way, that is an actual word for word quote repeatedly said by NPCs in the game, and is one of the many reasons why The Witcher makes me facepalm.
 

Frostbite3789

New member
Jul 12, 2010
1,778
0
0
Moonlight Butterfly said:
So the alternative just HAS to be that women are oppressed...seems legit.

Also I don't think Skyrim is as bad as you are making it out to be.
]

There you go assuming and twisting words again. You have an agenda and are dead set on it. It's kind of hilarious.

And really? Over 100 hours sunk into a game and I can't remember the name of a single relevant NPC in that game.
 

Frostbite3789

New member
Jul 12, 2010
1,778
0
0
Evil Top Hat said:
Not the slightest bit. I could only manage to get through 2 hours of the first game before giving up, but in that time the game shoved in my face copious amounts of completely unnecessary, out of place sex scenes and characters with no personality in skimpy outfits that existed for their own sake. It's approach to sex was token and juvenile.

Racism is about as original in RPGs as the level up mechanic these days, so I wasn't exactly blown away by the odd character that would occasionally say "your mother sucks dwarf cock" either. I'm not shitting you by the way, that is an actual word for word quote repeatedly said by NPCs in the game, and is one of the many reasons why The Witcher makes me facepalm.
You must have been blazing through the game if you had multiple sexual encounters within 2 hours. Because that's pretty impossible. Or you didn't actually play it.

Edit: Not to mention every sexual encounter is totally optional and you have to really actually go out of your way/choose to have them. The game doesn't force them on you.

Dislike the first game for clunky controls and poor pacing. Not for optional sexual encounters.
 

Evil Top Hat

New member
May 21, 2011
579
0
0
Frostbite3789 said:
You must have been blazing through the game if you had multiple sexual encounters within 2 hours. Because that's pretty impossible. Or you didn't actually play it.

Edit: Not to mention every sexual encounter is totally optional and you have to really actually go out of your way/choose to have them. The game doesn't force them on you.
Oh look, you again.

Triss, a random witch in that forest/countryside area, and the woman with the red hair in the same area, and final woman for whom you finish a sidequest, at which point she immediately propositions you to have sex with her in a nearby mill. I think that constitutes as "multiple sexual encounters".

Whether or not you choose to engage in a sexual encounter doesn't add or subtract to the extent to which it is juvenile. They were there, should I choose to view them or not, and regardless of my decision, I was still propositioned by a pretty large number of women, and I found it both distracting and pathetic.
Even if the propositions were subtle and discrete, if they exist, and they're juvenile, the game's attitudes towards sex is juvenile all the same.

Dislike the first game for clunky controls and poor pacing. Not for optional sexual encounters.
No. I'll dislike whatever I please about a game.

Twice now, you've responded unnecessarily, aggressively and illogically to me simply because my opinion is different to yours. I loathe seeing or engaging in petty internet arguments, so I'm not going to indulge your unwillingness to accept that I don't think the same as you do.
In other words: Don't bother trying to start an argument, I'm not going to reply to you.
 

BarbaricGoose

New member
May 25, 2010
796
0
0
BrotherRool said:
The Witcher isn't mature in terms of sex, women and NPC dialogue. In fact, it's incredibly immature and half the dialogue has been written by a 13 year old. There's a whole gameplay mechanic that would give people who know what a female is migraine's just thinking about the design of it.

'I couldn't sleep last night over the sound of my neighbour beating his wife' as NPC dialoge is something that belongs in Saints Row, it is the purple dildo of maturity and is only fitting in a game which doesn't understand the words it's using.
I'm sorry, but this is full of misinformation.

First of all, you can't say "In fact" and then proceed to say something that is not at all, in any conceivable way, a fact. IN FACT, the game was NOT written by a 13-year-old.

The sex card thing in TW1 was a little silly, yeah. They did away with it in TW2, but frankly, I think people overreacted a bit. Then again, they're gamers, so those two go hand in hand. It WASN'T a gameplay mechanic, though. You couldn't even call it a mini-game. You got cards that depicted naked women, and you got them basically by talking to the right people. Calling it a "Gameplay mechanic" misleads people into thinking there's something like "Hot Coffee" in TW1. There isn't. They were a more lewd take on collectibles. Nothing more.

If you don't like the game, that's fair. There's nothing I can say to change your mind, but you clearly haven't played much of it, or don't remember any of it, so better not to speak ill of it.
 

BrotherRool

New member
Oct 31, 2008
3,834
0
0
BarbaricGoose said:
BrotherRool said:
The Witcher isn't mature in terms of sex, women and NPC dialogue. In fact, it's incredibly immature and half the dialogue has been written by a 13 year old. There's a whole gameplay mechanic that would give people who know what a female is migraine's just thinking about the design of it.

'I couldn't sleep last night over the sound of my neighbour beating his wife' as NPC dialoge is something that belongs in Saints Row, it is the purple dildo of maturity and is only fitting in a game which doesn't understand the words it's using.
I'm sorry, but this is full of misinformation.

First of all, you can't say "In fact" and then proceed to say something that is not at all, in any conceivable way, a fact. IN FACT, the game was NOT written by a 13-year-old.

The sex card thing in TW1 was a little silly, yeah. They did away with it in TW2, but frankly, I think people overreacted a bit. Then again, they're gamers, so those two go hand in hand. It WASN'T a gameplay mechanic, though. You couldn't even call it a mini-game. You got cards that depicted naked women, and you got them basically by talking to the right people. Calling it a "Gameplay mechanic" misleads people into thinking there's something like "Hot Coffee" in TW1. There isn't. They were a more lewd take on collectibles. Nothing more.

If you don't like the game, that's fair. There's nothing I can say to change your mind, but you clearly haven't played much of it, or don't remember any of it, so better not to speak ill of it.
I'm sorry for the offence. I played it two weeks ago and yes I didn't play far beyond the first chapter (I think I've mentioned that elsewhere here but this is a pretty megalithic thread by now) because there was a bit with the witch at the end, that touched upon something I'm particularly sensitive to and so I stopped playing.

In fact is just word cruft, I tend to use a lot of it and I'm not particularly sophisticated in my written communication (I really struggle not to use smiley's for one thing), I didn't mean to mislead anyone, but in this particular place, because it's an opinion thread, I hope that the majority of people didn't interpret me as suggesting that I know the literal end all truth in the immaturity discussion. Since you're the first person to call me out on the use of that phrase and yet it's done nothing to stifle a healthy discussion and people expressing contrary views in the thread, I believe in this case I haven't done much harm and I don't think anyone believed that an actual 13 year old wrote the game.

The gameplay mechanic is a more serious accusation and I may have genuinely misled someone there, which I'd be sorry to do. I tend to play games with a very heavy story focus (Alpha Protocol, KotoR 2, Planescape: Torment) and in particular, conversation is a very important element of gameplay to me. So when we have a collectible that is triggered by certain conversation options and quest triggers, I described is a gameplay mechanic, which in a broad sense I believe it is. Give flowers to lady, get sex card etc. However you're quite right that it could easily make someone believe there was some sort of hot-coffee thing involved and that's wrong of me.

However, in the place where I start to disagree with you, frankly the game would have been maturer if it had a hot-coffee mechanic instead of the moronic conversation mechanic it had instead. In one case in particular, when the Witch proffered sex in exchange for you trying to help her not be burned alive, if you accepted in a similar situation in real life, I believe you could go to court for statutory rape. It really repulses me that the developers didn't notice that taken sexual favours off a women because she's scared you'll leave her to die otherwise is an incredibly wrong thing to do. And the dialogue for that instance is absolutely sickening 'I've wanted you from the moment I first laid eyes on you,', then why the fuck is he taking advantage of her then. And you get a collectible for doing it. I absolutely cannot abide men taking sexual advantage over women from a position of power and we have a semi-reward mechanic for it? When the dialogue started and I began to catch a glimpse of where it was going, I couldn't believe what was going on, that someone would write this and not know what they were doing.

So, although this is going to seem laughable to you, I actually consider myself as being fairly nice when I call the devs 13 year olds. Because I had the choice of choosing to believe they were so inept they couldn't realise that they had an option for the protagonist to near-violate someone, or that they put that there deliberately.

In Yahtzee's words
Some people might call The Witcher misogynistic, for the fact that every single woman in the game shows off a cleavage you could lose your dog in, and will jump on you at the slightest provocation, for a PG-13 sex scene, followed by a paradoxically explicit dirty postcard. Personally, I think it's less The Witcher's obvious hatred of women, and more the same misguided pretension to maturity that also causes the characters to cuss with every alternate word.
And that is what I've chosen to believe. This is something (the witch thing) I'm incredibly touchy about, it fills me with a lot of squick and disgust just thinking about it and there are reasons why I'm like that, but I don't particularly want to go into them, and I understand that other people aren't going to be offended in the same way and I definitely don't expect anyone else to stop playing a game they just bought at the end of the first chapter because of it, but I could have chosen to believe the developers were sick people and I didn't. I chose ignorance instead.

And as far as maturity goes, any system that has a women say 'I love flowers' and then you give her some flowers and then you have sex, that isn't a mature depiction of sex. I'm not saying the game is bad, I'm not saying it shouldn't exist (although if they wanted to cut the witch bit out thats fine with me), I'm not even saying the game doesn't handle other themes in a mature way. But, you've been pretty fair to me all things considered, so I hope you'll understand if I continue to believe that a game with that sort of sex system, doesn#t handle sex and women in a particularly mature fashion
 

endtherapture

New member
Nov 14, 2011
3,127
0
0
Although people say Geralt is taking advantage of these poor women for sex...the women take advantage of Geralt in the games just as often.
 

Moonlight Butterfly

Be the Leaf
Mar 16, 2011
6,157
0
0
Frostbite3789 said:
Moonlight Butterfly said:
So the alternative just HAS to be that women are oppressed...seems legit.

Also I don't think Skyrim is as bad as you are making it out to be.
]

There you go assuming and twisting words again. You have an agenda and are dead set on it. It's kind of hilarious.

And really? Over 100 hours sunk into a game and I can't remember the name of a single relevant NPC in that game.
Seems unlikely that you dont remember a single one.

And I have over 400 hours played in skyrim dunno why you keep repeating that.