Really? You'd pay more for something just to get rid of people you can easily avoid by muting or not going online in the first place?AjimboB said:I'd rather pay double for a game I buy, if it means I don't have to put up with idiot children harassing and annoying me online. That's why I liked it when the PS3 was still $600, because it was out of most kids' price ranges. Besides, isn't the average gamer's age supposed to be 34 now?SUPA FRANKY said:AjimboB said:It would be really nice if more parents actually did that. More mature games would actually be MATURE, and I won't have whiny 12 year old cursing me out every game that I play online.
Seriously, it would be heaven, gaming bliss, not to have these children online.
Who cares if they miss out? They'll be able to get the games eventually, once they get older, and will therefore no longer be missing out.
Seriously, there should be an age limit for gaming. You have to be 16 to drive a car, and yes, if you are under 16, you are missing out, but who the fuck cares, it makes it safer for everyone else. Same thing should happen with games, having a 16 or 17 year old age limit to play mature games, and it should somehow be monitored.
THAT WOULD BE AWESOME!
I can really see that backfiring in terms of sales.
Damn? Whats with it with the hate on children?