It was a good episode but the whole making the robot think about his humanity to stop him exploding was just plain rubbish. I'm liking Matt Smith as a Dr and am glad the Daleks are back because they are a good enemy.
Firstly how could it be mistaken for a party ring? No whole in the middle and wrong colour! So not sure why I'm focussing on thatSun Flash said:Also, Jammy Dodger Self Destruct Button? Hell Yeah! Although I spent the next 5 minutes arguing with my mum whether it was a party ring or jammy dodger he was holding, naturally, I won. I know my biscuits me
Between Doctor Who, Ashes To Ashes and Heroes, Weekend telly is awesome!
Broadsword to Danny Boy!
RedMenace said:If you're going to give them a major re-haul than make them look GOOD (as in threatening) and get rid of the god-damned plunger!
You CAN'T get rid of the plunger! It's part of the design! I do agree that they could and should look more threatening however which IMHO the RTD ones did, although they looked a bit cutsey done up as soldiersRedMenace said:get rid of the god-damned plunger!
Couldn't agree with you more on the RTD thing. Why couldn't he just have the Doctor beat the Daleks but not manage to destroy them, like in this episode. My Mum (whose fault it is for me being an utter sci-fi geek) reckoned that they'd already dealt with River cause the Doctor mentioned getting married at the beginning of the Xmas episode, BTW what made you think it was Amy? not a lot of evidence yet.Mercurius507 said:I got sick of Russel T Davies killing off the Daleks and bringing them back over and over again, totally ruined their reputation to me. I felt the primary purpose of this episode was so the new writer Stephen Moffat could fix that; which he did brilliantly, I love the fact they've bought back a more classic look for the Daleks and can't wait to see which direction Moffat takes them in, as long as he doesn't kill them off like Davies did. Can't believe River Song is in the next episode, I was SO convinced that Amy Pond was River Song... Still could be though.
A few things, remember when River said her Doctor could make entire armies turn and run with just his words? Thats exactly what he did to the Atraxi, also remember when River said her Doctor opened the TARDIS with a click of his fingers? Exactly what he did when he took Amy with him. I also think that narration that Amy did in the second episode was her writing in River's diary. Don't know what you think but it just seemed to fit together for me.QueenWren said:Couldn't agree with you more on the RTD thing. Why couldn't he just have the Doctor beat the Daleks but not manage to destroy them, like in this episode. My Mum (whose fault it is for me being an utter sci-fi geek) reckoned that they'd already dealt with River cause the Doctor mentioned getting married at the beginning of the Xmas episode, BTW what made you think it was Amy? not a lot of evidence yet.Mercurius507 said:I got sick of Russel T Davies killing off the Daleks and bringing them back over and over again, totally ruined their reputation to me. I felt the primary purpose of this episode was so the new writer Stephen Moffat could fix that; which he did brilliantly, I love the fact they've bought back a more classic look for the Daleks and can't wait to see which direction Moffat takes them in, as long as he doesn't kill them off like Davies did. Can't believe River Song is in the next episode, I was SO convinced that Amy Pond was River Song... Still could be though.
Don't know what happened there. I think this is a reasonable idea but it might place some severe limitations on how Amy and River interact with each other, also couldn't he have learned these things since he met River? He did the click thing at the end of that pair of episodesMercurius507 said:A few things, remember when River said her Doctor could make entire armies turn and run with just his words? Thats exactly what he did to the Atraxi, also remember when River said her Doctor opened the TARDIS with a click of his fingers? Exactly what he did when he took Amy with him. I also think that narration that Amy did in the second episode was her writing in River's diary. Don't know what you think but it just seemed to fit together for me.
Matt Lucas?! Now that I'd like to see!setsunafseiei said:I read on the BBC website that Matt Lucas' Doctor was going to be more along the lines of the Fourth Doctor played by Tom Baker as in quirky and not as dark as David Tennent's Tenth Doctor. However like yourself I am wary as to what direction the show is taken as I was rather enjoying the development of the tenth Doctor into the darker side of a Time Lord. Time will tell.
Those Daleks were created from tissue taken from Davros (see season 4 ending), so they wern't of the same genetical mutations that the original Dalek DNA are based from. The new ones are created from pure Dalek DNA.kaziard said:isnt it dalek?
OT yeah it was a great epi but im not too sure about the new daleks, im still not sure why they are more pure than the older ones...
I thought they DID look rather threatening (the new ones), though the colours are a little...retro (not a bad thing, but different). Also, it's weird how well the khaki daleks fitted into the War Room setting. They just seemed to...belongQueenWren said:You CAN'T get rid of the plunger! It's part of the design! I do agree that they could and should look more threatening however which IMHO the RTD ones did, although they looked a bit cutsey done up as soldiersRedMenace said:get rid of the god-damned plunger!