Doctor Who Ratings Rise in the US, Fall in the UK

Recommended Videos

lukey94

New member
Sep 2, 2008
404
0
0
Well I was driving to my girlfriends to watch it, the roads were empty, I seriously only passed 2 or 3 other cars on my way, there were more than that during the World Cup last year ....

Also don't these reports just count the number of TVs tuned in to BBC, what about the other people sitting around the TV? It's more than likely that for every TV on BBC had at least 3-6 people sat around it
 

AVATAR_RAGE

New member
May 28, 2009
1,120
0
0
It was Easter weekend people! People where out seeing friends and family. Including me I was out missed the show, watched it the next day on iplayer
 

Da_Vane

New member
Dec 31, 2007
195
0
0
The BNP appears to do well at local level because of a flaw in the "First Past the Post" voting system, which means that a winning candidate can get into power with fewer votes, depending upon the number of opposition candidates and how divided their opposition is. Since the UK doesn't limit what candidates stand, this means the BNP can get into power with a majority as low as little over 25% of the local population, simply because the remaining 75% is split equally between opposition candidates.

Hopefully, this will be remedied with the Referendum on May 5th in the UK, where we are voting for the possible switch to the Alternative Vote system, which is fairer and more representative overall, and requires that candidates get at least a 50% majority to win. Although initially only applicable for General Elections, once it has been proven to work - and it will - it will quickly be adopted across all levels of UK elections.

The effect will be to stop candidates getting in with reduced majorities simply by dividing the voting populace - a common tactic by tailoring your rhetoric toward voter sympathies from door to door, spilling hate, ignorance, and prejudice.

As for Doctor Who, I watched it and I wasn't terribly impressed. The storyline itself was feasible enough - and being set in America - there is some justification for some of the Americanization of the series, but not all of it. Even the supposedly "British" characters came across as Americanised, for no apparent reason. They weren't trying to blend in.

As for the Doctor - is he really supposed to be THAT ANNOYING? He just comes across as an arrogant buffoon, which probably accounts for the major Americanization - It's like he's a "space dick" now - rather than the Doctor. I got more of a vibe from Team America ("Fuck Yeah!") through the plot than anything from Doctor Who. I wasn't at all surprised that it was created by BBC America, because it shows all the classic Americanisation of any property that goes across the pond as part of a multinational - instant rewriting with a US-centric egotism regardless of context for an audience who might as well act as if a map of the US came with "Here be Dragons" outside the borders.

I have no problems with things being set in the US, and I understand that for the most part, when people think modern, they think of the US, but when other IPs start pandering to this homogenization of culture just because they think that's what it takes to get the US to follow it, that is a step too far.
 

Terminal Blue

Elite Member
Legacy
Feb 18, 2010
3,933
1,804
118
Country
United Kingdom
Seriously guys, what the hell..

All those years David Tenant was making puppy eyes while Russell T Davies wrote sappy, emotion-laden tonally-shifting drivel about the power of friendship and how the Doctor was basically space-Jesus you lapped it up, and now we get well paced emotionally complex plots written by a multi-award-winning screenwriter and you're whining because a character says 'gas'.

I say 'gas' sometimes. I'm sorry that modern Britain isn't some unique speshul place where American culture fears to tread, but many people have been using American words for years and the country hasn't imploded yet.

As for the Americanization of characters.. Did you all miss all those times of David Tenant coming across like a wisecracking dick who had seen literally everything before, then wanksting out as soon as anything with the slightest hint of emotion dared to rear its ugly head? Most American shows wouldn't even have dared included some of the mawkish shit and oversimplistic moral lessons they got away with in that era.

"It's not just a torch any more, it's hope and its love and its.. BLEEEEUUUUGGHHH!"

That era consistently broke every rule of stereotypical British narrative and characterization and yet the show became more popular than it had ever been before. The doctor went from being a self-effacing everyman to an impossibly competent prettyboy and you loved it. The writing went from being about repressed emotional undercurrents to drawn out shots of mawkish sentiment and excessive displays of 'twoo lurve' and you loved it. The comedy went from understated situational humour to 'wacky' arsing around and dropping shitty Ghostbusters references and you loved it.

If you're looking for some kind of national character to be expressed in the show, where was it during that period? What about any of the above is distinctly British?

Incidentally, you know what's actually nice to see. That British shows can do multinationalism better than most American ones, that they do more than just throw in an American character or two to dance like a monkey and impress us with their exotic ways, that we can have genuine episodes set in or themed around countries besides our own without having to introduce some sniffy trace of nationalism which treats those people as bad jokes or vulgar stereotypes. The fact that the reverse doesn't happen nearly enough is no excuse for us to justify similar behaviour in ourselves.
 

IAmTheVoid

New member
Apr 26, 2009
114
0
0
sravankb said:
IAmTheVoid said:
The show's gone to hell? Huh? Sure, the first of this two parter wasn't all that impressive, but last season was pretty good. Where's all this pessimism come from?
Pessimism? On the Escapist?


Seriously, look around at all the threads nowadays. More than half of them are about how someone hates something, rather than discussing what they like.
I think every poster has the right to say he dislikes something, it's just that I like them to explain --why--.
 

Mr Cwtchy

New member
Jan 13, 2009
1,045
0
0
evilthecat said:
That's one frothy opinion you have there. Seriously, calm down.

And to your quote, that was from a commentator of the Olympics, of course he's going to say sappy stuff like that.

Just to emphasise again, your angry opinion is your own, don't belittle others because you don't agree with them. You say 'well paced emotionally complex', I and apparently many others say downright snoozefest with the extra application of River Sue.
 

PatrickXD

New member
Aug 13, 2009
977
0
0
Well I didn't watch it because the new Doctor is shite, and I'm the the UK. Everyone else seems to love it though.
 

Terminal Blue

Elite Member
Legacy
Feb 18, 2010
3,933
1,804
118
Country
United Kingdom
Mr Cwtchy said:
And to your quote, that was from a commentator of the Olympics, of course he's going to say sappy stuff like that.
It's the mysterious and magical power of example!

Also, noone should care who was saying it. The whole sequence was utterly uncalled for within the narrative. But no, it has to happen so the Doctor can have a spontaneous moment of reminding the audience how bloody great he is, because the actual narrative itself clearly wasn't making that obvious enough.

While that was one of the worst offenders, there have been countless similar moments. Remember the 'Sound of Drums' finale which was going so well until it basically came down to the healing power of faith because everyone in the world believed in the Doctor? Or the weird Deus ex Machina they pulled right out of their arses so that Rose could get her own special doctor clone to share twoo luv with (I mean.. why.. the original ending was sad, yes, but it was also moving and powerful, why sacrifice that by pulling a completely random twist out which just randomly makes everything better?)

I know that myself and virtually everyone I know was reaching for the sick bucket throughout most of these moments.

Mr Cwtchy said:
Just to emphasise again, your angry opinion is your own, don't belittle others because you don't agree with them. You say 'well paced emotionally complex', I and apparently many others say downright snoozefest with the extra application of River Sue.
I'm not angry. I'm kind of bemused.

I'm guessing you liked all the bits with David Tennant gurning around/tearing up/being ridiculously over-competent with no emotional or tonal consistency? Really.. I was kind of hoping that noone did, and we were actually all just watching it for the same reasons, i.e. in the hope that in between all the stupidity there would actually be some decent plots, and I'll admit there were.

I'm too harsh on Russell T. Davies and David Tennant. They are and were both very good at particular things, but there's a particular period when they were working together when the sapp'n'wangst-o-meter seemed to be perpetually cranked right up to 11. I'm not kidding.. it ruined the show for me, yet it was also the absolute high point of popularity and besides my friendship circle and Charlie Brooker noone else seemed particularly bothered by it, so I just enjoyed the ride and tried to appreciate it on the same level.

But now a character says 'Gas' and its all a big problem. Really? That just seems.. unbelievably petty.

I'm not saying the show is necessarily flying high. I don't like Riversong either, you probably won't be surprised to know (although actually, I felt this most recent episode brought her closer to being likeable than she's ever been before). But there are a couple of episodes which have actually made me cry real tears. Steve Moffatt wrote them all. No ammount of 'everybody lives' 'power of love' stuff or watching David Tennant spend half an hour stalking people with sad music in the background (and then a random Ood showing up) brought me even close to the same response.

For future reference, this is my 'mild incredulity' voice. My angry voice is swearier and more personal.
 

Verlander

New member
Apr 22, 2010
2,449
0
0
JDKJ said:
Verlander said:
Yankeedoodles said:
Verlander said:
Yankeedoodles said:
Verlander said:
Yankeedoodles said:
Verlander said:
Yankeedoodles said:
Well I don't know about the two of you but I've thoroughly enjoyed this 'fiasco'. With the witty barbs and all it was a bit like reading a script for 'House'. BDKJ seems to be making the very simple point that racism and xenophobia are just as prevalent in British politics as they are in American politics and has offered certain facts which seem to back up the fact that nationalist parties have gained support among at least a minority of Britons. I don't really see how that can be argued given the evidence presented. Now what I find most interesting is the fact that a previous thread had led me to believe (correct me if I'm wrong BDKJ) that BDKJ was a British expat living in the States. Knowing that, Abandon, would you still have argued so vehemently (or argued at all) against the mere assertion that American and British politics have a similar level of racism and xenophobia? Did the flag in his profile make all the difference?

If nothing else this thread has completely disabused me of the notion that Britons are any less nationalistic than American and for that I'm glad I read it. Personally I think there will come a day when we as a global interconnected society decide that nationalism as a concept should be viewed in much the same way as elitism.
Dunno about those guys, but I lived in America and the UK (and Australia as well) and I'd easily say that on a ground, personal level, the Brits are by far the least nationalistic... that is, until foreigners try and move in on their territory (ironic much?)

Most Brits don't own a flag, nor would dream of ever waving one outside of a football match, and close to none know the national anthem. Considering in America that's basic knowledge, and they even brainwa... I mean, require children to salute a flag every morning in school, while reeling off some diatribe about how good it is to live in a slightly different location to everyone else, the Brits aren't nationalist at all. They prove you can be a small minded bigot, racist and xenophobe, while still being self depreciating about your own country. Quite a feat.

I'm not nationalist, and I think that the concept is ridiculous. However, you can't accuse the vast majority of Brits of being nationalist when we aren't, especially compared to America. You guys even made up your own sports, because you didn't want to play with the rest of the world :p
Well I and I would wager to bet most Americans have no idea what the middle of the Star Spangled Banner is. We just sort of mumble it when it's played at sporting events. But looking at the sum total of this thread, can you honestly say that this does not reek of British nationalism?

Speaking to American nationalism specifically, I can understand why it may be annoying to a number of people in other countries. It annoys me on occasion. But, sadly, there are a number of social issues still very present in this country which nationalism is quite effective at overcoming. Hopefully we'll push past those some day but until then I'm afraid the international community will simply have to try to tolerate it.
No, I wouldn't say this thread reeks of British nationalism. I think it reeks of slight xenophobia, but more than that, it reeks of boyish competition.

The thing is, (and this is what America is going to need to put up with), the US has entered the homes of every western country, in its media, its products and its way of life. It's like America has infiltrated us all. It's like we all know you personally, and don't realise that you are a very different nation, and are as foreign as any other country can be, especially in your personal attitudes. And all of this feeling of familiarity goes double for us English speaking countries - we don't even get a dubbed version of your stuff, it's not necessary. You speak to us on a daily basis in your own voices, in our very homes, in our cinema, in what we eat or drink, and in how we now live our lives. And so that makes us brothers. Unfortunately, you're the brother who got all the breaks in life. WE are the runty one who can never get the girl. So every time we get a success, yeah we rub it in your faces. Like this thread. I think we're entitled to. We are mass consumers of what you export, so it's nice to be appreciated too. Add to that general British competitiveness, and the fact that most Brits are kinda rude as a way of life, and you get threads like this. It isn't a nationalist thing, it's more of a society kinda thing. We aren't like this because we love Britain, we're like this because, frankly, Britain doesn't have much worth loving any more, and so we take full advantage of our successes. We'll still be drinking Coca Cola tomorrow, and watching awful remakes of good foreign language films, but allow us Dr Who today :p

EDIT: Ask any Brit in person the second line of the anthem, and look at their confused faces... it's not sung in schools, nor taught. Most schools won't own a British flag at all. What's the point? It's a difficult comparison, being very different countries, but you can't compare English nationalism, as it doesn't exist. The BNP and EDL and that a just fronts for racist parties. They don't give a shit about "nationalism" or patriotism.
Hmm... those are some very interesting points. Up until I took a trip to Europe a few years ago I didn't realize how omnipresent America is in much the rest of the world. I went to see Canterbury cathedral and there was a beautiful entrance arch for it and on either side of it were a McDonalds and a Starbucks. While I was in Germany about to go to sleep I watched nearly the entire movie of Herbie the Love Bug. I guess I had just assumed that everything would be so different over there. And I guess I was surprised and a little disappointed. If you don't watch the news here it is very easy to forget that the rest of the world exists.

Still, it honestly sounds like you're describing nationalism to me. If Dr. Who is something that you're proud of simply because it was made in Britain, by Brits, using British funds then what you're feeling is nationalist pride. Nationalism doesn't need to manifest in relation to overt national symbols like the flag or what have you.

Edit: And contrary to what I said before that's not necessarily a bad thing. I've really enjoyed the Dr. Who that I've seen and I think it's an excellent diplomat representing British culture the world over.
I still wouldn't call it patriotic... it's hard to explain. We don't love it because it's British, we love it for being good. We are chuffed that it's held in high regard in other countries that normally do it better, but we'd still enjoy it were it not British (although I don't think any other country could do it the same way).

As for the Americanisation of Europe... that's capitalism for you. Although, I'd rather have contemporary American produce and arts than the cheap replicas of ancient European arts that seem to adorn every building in Georgia (where I used to live)...

Hmm... well, alright.

I can certainly agree about replicating ancient architecture. Greco-Roman Revival has never been my favorite and it is everywhere in the South. The place where I live has a lot of Art Deco buildings that I really like. They almost look like they're right out of Bioshock. Granted, Art Deco is technically French but I think the US has done a good job of 'owning' it.
Just look to one of the most magnificent buildings in the world (Empire State) to see how good American architecture can be. People should stop trying to replicate, and start trying to innovate...

I like how the conversation changed from Dr Who, to popular architecture, via politics.
The Empire State Building (and, in my opinion, the much more impressive Chrysler Building) are both in the Art Deco style -- which isn't American. It's actually French. But, as Yankeedoo points out, the Americans have "owned" the style. And created a capital city in homage to it: South Miami Beach.
Yeah, but they were built around the same time, so they count!
 

Liudeius

New member
Oct 5, 2010
442
0
0
8.5 million was the lowest number of UK viewers to watch a season premier of the new Doctor Who? Wow, that seems quite high.
 

Elvoret

New member
Mar 3, 2011
86
0
0
T'was pretty good. Mind you, I decided to watch some of the older series (being born in '92 not having seen them) and finding the McCoy episodes ok. Make of that what you will.

Whomsoever obviously pointed out yesterday the fact that the tardis has actually been places other than london or whatnot gets a cookie.

It might bring some change to the quarries people've been watching for the past 40 years.

I prefer the stories Moffat does m'self. He can make things frightening (like someone mentioned before, those silences look like the slender man. Or the pale man.). I think the episode is a slight reference to alien abductions, and how no-one can remember...something.
 

cthulhumythos

New member
Aug 28, 2009
637
0
0
The_root_of_all_evil said:
Canadian Mounties using boomerangs.
that would be AMAZING.

also, i don't get what all the fuss is about, it's not like this is the first episode to be placed in america.
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
cthulhumythos said:
The_root_of_all_evil said:
Canadian Mounties using boomerangs.
that would be AMAZING.

also, i don't get what all the fuss is about, it's not like this is the first episode to be placed in america.
It's not about the American angle. It's about a hoard of little things that shouldn't be in a first episode. On their own they're rather small, but together they just jolted it down from great to good.

But a Scottish guy saying "Gasoline" is just really irksome.
 

cthulhumythos

New member
Aug 28, 2009
637
0
0
The_root_of_all_evil said:
cthulhumythos said:
The_root_of_all_evil said:
Canadian Mounties using boomerangs.
that would be AMAZING.

also, i don't get what all the fuss is about, it's not like this is the first episode to be placed in america.
It's not about the American angle. It's about a hoard of little things that shouldn't be in a first episode. On their own they're rather small, but together they just jolted it down from great to good.

But a Scottish guy saying "Gasoline" is just really irksome.
i had not realized that that was such a problem...

erm.. so what do the brits call gas? (i think it's petrol, but i don't want to get it wrong and sound like an ass)
 

Ainsley Bartlett

New member
Apr 27, 2011
71
0
0
luvd1 said:
And yeah, it was a long Easter weekend with summer like weather. Most people here where away for the weekend. This is England. Who fekin knows when we'll have such weather again!?!
Everyone knows when! Next April!
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
cthulhumythos said:
erm.. so what do the brits call gas? (i think it's petrol, but i don't want to get it wrong and sound like an ass)
Petrol is the base word, but there are a few slang words as well. It's not wrong, just disconcerting. (Equally if David Tennant was to use his original Scottish accent as the Doctor, you'd feel immersion breaking)

I honestly think it was trying to be too clever and has left far too many plates up in the air - especially as there's a few horribly contrived points. As Riversong slapped the Doctor's face for being "cold", that was my reaction to Moffat - which saddens me greatly.
 

cthulhumythos

New member
Aug 28, 2009
637
0
0
The_root_of_all_evil said:
cthulhumythos said:
erm.. so what do the brits call gas? (i think it's petrol, but i don't want to get it wrong and sound like an ass)
Petrol is the base word, but there are a few slang words as well. It's not wrong, just disconcerting. (Equally if David Tennant was to use his original Scottish accent as the Doctor, you'd feel immersion breaking)

I honestly think it was trying to be too clever and has left far too many plates up in the air - especially as there's a few horribly contrived points. As Riversong slapped the Doctor's face for being "cold", that was my reaction to Moffat - which saddens me greatly.
frankly, i sort of felt the episode was rather...dull. it starts as "guess what? Doctor's dead!" and then he isn't. and then the part with nixon, and then the aliens and what-not. but it all has little impact due to the first scene apparently stealing all of the "oomf" from the rest of the plot. i dunno, i felt that it was just a weak episode.

honestly, while i do not mind being catered to, it'd probably be best if they at least used their proper dialect, because that just makes sense.

i don't know, the whole death thing probably would've better placed at the end of the second part, as opposed to taking away from the first ones story.
 

Lokithrsourcerer

New member
Nov 24, 2008
305
0
0
I've been loving the new doctor he's not quite David tenant but he's damn good. i think one problem is that the show can be too sentimental at times. but it still rocks. I don't know many people (including all my neighbours) who don't watch it but 80-90% of the people i know all watch on the iplayer.

EDIT: also i want to wait till i have seen part 2 before i make a judgement on it as the story has only really been set up we dont really know much about what's going on at the moment.
 

illas

RAWR!!!
Apr 4, 2010
291
0
0
I'm not sure if Americanisation is the problem, it's more that the show seems to be becoming increasingly simplified, lacking in subtlety, and more than a little formulaic.

Oh, wait...

In all seriousness: it was a beautiful weekend; there was no big draw to this series (no new character/actor/writer); and "the Doctor goes to the US" is hardly as captivating a sell as "The Doctor meets Vincent Van Gogh" or "Blink".
God that episode was superb; it still amazes me that Carey Mulligan was in Dr Who.