Documentary makers mistake game footage for terrorist film.

Recommended Videos

Iron Criterion

New member
Feb 4, 2009
1,271
0
0
Kotaku reports that documenters making a film exploring the possible connections between one Colonel Gaddafi and the IRA, for the British television network ITV, confused actual footage from ARMA 2 for supposedly IRA footage featuring a helicopter being shot down by militants. The clip was given a back story and was narrated. To our overseas friends, ITV is a major commercial public service TV network here in the UK, with a now ironic name. They were one of the main television channels in the analogue days.

http://kotaku.com/5844214/idiot-documentarians-reveal-secret-ira-terrorism-footage-its-a-video-game-from-2009

"In the documentary Exposure - Gaddafi and the IRA, aired Monday night in the U.K., a voice can be heard saying, "With Gaddafi's heavy machine guns it was possible to shoot down a helicopter as the terrorists own footage of 1988 shows."

On the screen viewers witness shaky footage of what appears to be a heavy machine gun mounted into the bed of a camouflage-painted pick-up truck. The words IRA film 1988 are displayed over the video. In the footage, viewers see a group of men in balaclavas standing around the vehicles as it fires at a distant helicopter.
"This was what the security forces feared most," the voice continues. "It may have been a lucky hit, but for the Army and crew once was enough. No one died in this attack..."

That's probably because the footage actually came from ARMA 2, a tactical shooter released for the computer by developers Bohemia Interactive Studios in 2009.

Reached for comment this morning, Marek Spanel, CEO of Bohemia Interactive, said he wasn't aware of the game's use in the documentary until Kotaku contacted him.

"We were not aware of this at all," he wrote. "It is very weird to see our game used this way especially considering the journalists were simply unable to tell difference between reality and game footage and described a short film clearly made using our game Arma II with what they call real IRA footage from 1988. Our games offer a great level of freedom to our users to create all kind of things but in this particular case, it is very misleading. Plus it is surprising ITV did not seek for permission to use our game in this way."'

Considering the media is always criticising gamers for supposedly being unable to tell fantasy from reality this is highly ironic. Was this as ITV claim a mere accident that happened during the editing process? Maybe it was the result of poor research, or even a juvenile practical joke?
 

Furioso

New member
Jun 16, 2009
7,981
0
0
So I assume their fact checking department consists of a few insects and a poorly maintained cactus? Ah well this thing at least made me laugh
 

emeraldrafael

New member
Jul 17, 2010
8,589
0
0
knowing nothing of this channel (live in the us, we have IFC), but seeing that it means independent television, I'll give it the benefit of the doubt and say that they dont get a lot of funding and most of their stuff looks like indie college stuff.

otherwise thats hysterical.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0


Well researched, people. Well researched. I wonder where they got the statistic for for "No one died in this attack".
 

Redlin5_v1legacy

Better Red than Dead
Aug 5, 2009
48,836
0
0
*Facepalm*

As a filmmaker myself I am ashamed to see this level of attention being paid to the footage being used. Research people, research! It's what holds up the story and proves its real!

[sub][sub]*Goes off to mumble in the angry dome*[/sub][/sub]
 

Catchy Slogan

New member
Jun 17, 2009
1,931
0
0
emeraldrafael said:
knowing nothing of this channel (live in the us, we have IFC), but seeing that it means independent television, I'll give it the benefit of the doubt and say that they dont get a lot of funding and most of their stuff looks like indie college stuff.

otherwise thats hysterical.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAA. Oh wait, you're serious. ITV is one of the main tv channels in britain. There are five of them

BBC1
BBC2
ITV (they also have 4 different channels and were voted as one of the most popular)
Channel 4
Five

ITV make a ridiculous amount of money from stuff like X factor and Britains Got Talent.
 

emeraldrafael

New member
Jul 17, 2010
8,589
0
0
Catchy Slogan said:
emeraldrafael said:
knowing nothing of this channel (live in the us, we have IFC), but seeing that it means independent television, I'll give it the benefit of the doubt and say that they dont get a lot of funding and most of their stuff looks like indie college stuff.

otherwise thats hysterical.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAA. Oh wait, you're serious. ITV is one of the main tv channels in britain. There are five of them

BBC1
BBC2
ITV (they also have 4 different channels and were voted as one of the most popular)
Channel 4
Five

They make aridiculous amount of money from stuff like X factor and Britains Got Talent.
Like i said, not a british citizen.
 

2733

New member
Sep 13, 2010
371
0
0
hehehe, this fills me will glee and amusement. How did they mess that up?

I'm just glad no one was hurt.
 

Rawne1980

New member
Jul 29, 2011
4,144
0
0
Now that was amusing.

Next week, Greenpeace rescue captured animals with the help of a sprinting blue hedgehog.
 

Caisu

New member
Mar 27, 2008
24
0
0
emeraldrafael said:
knowing nothing of this channel (live in the us, we have IFC), but seeing that it means independent television, I'll give it the benefit of the doubt and say that they dont get a lot of funding and most of their stuff looks like indie college stuff.

otherwise thats hysterical.
It's made more hysterical by the fact that ITV isn't actually a little indie project with hardly any budget; it's one of the original five big channels we had before digital: BBC1, BBC2, ITV, Channel 4 and Channel 5. I'm really surprised something like this slipped through... it should be rather obvious...
 

Sizzle Montyjing

Pronouns - Slam/Slammed/Slammin'
Apr 5, 2011
2,213
0
0
Ah... ITV...
Please, stick to doing crappy talent shows and reality stuff, you're not very good at documentaries or drama...
Seriously, this is embarrasing.
How could they fuck up this badly...?
 

OldGus

New member
Feb 1, 2011
226
0
0
bahumat42 said:
ITV is lowest common denominator stuff.
does nobody remember this debacle

<youtube=4_sJnFUHcrg>

bad television is bad television, count me un-suprised.
I don't know if I should be thanking you or not, but I now know that the UK has their own version of Fox.
 

imnot

New member
Apr 23, 2010
3,916
0
0
OldGus said:
bahumat42 said:
ITV is lowest common denominator stuff.
does nobody remember this debacle

<youtube=4_sJnFUHcrg>

bad television is bad television, count me un-suprised.
I don't know if I should be thanking you or not, but I now know that the UK has their own version of Fox.
In fainess that was a tv show not the entire channel :p
The daily mail is our version of FOX :p
 

ReservoirAngel

New member
Nov 6, 2010
3,781
0
0
I've kind of stopped holding ITV to proper standards any more so I can't say I'm surprised. Baffled is more accurate a word. I mean, this should have been found out under basic fact checking. You know fact checking? It's that process that makes sure your documentary actually has correct facts in it!

My God...

imnotparanoid said:
The daily mail is our version of FOX :p
I think you give the Daily Mail too much credit. It doesn't take anything to such extremes and comparatively the number of the people who take it seriously is very low.
 

OldGus

New member
Feb 1, 2011
226
0
0
imnotparanoid said:
OldGus said:
bahumat42 said:
ITV is lowest common denominator stuff.
does nobody remember this debacle

<youtube=4_sJnFUHcrg>

bad television is bad television, count me un-suprised.
I don't know if I should be thanking you or not, but I now know that the UK has their own version of Fox.
In fainess that was a tv show not the entire channel :p
The daily mail is our version of FOX :p
Ok, maybe one TV show, I'll give you that. Fox doesn't just do news, that's just the only thing they're famous for outside of the US. Namely because that's what's on their website, and oh, do they do it badly.
I understand this is more like the "fair and balanced" talk show programs on Fox, but also understand now that ITV doesn't do horrible news as well.
 

Morti

New member
Aug 19, 2008
187
0
0
Catchy Slogan said:
emeraldrafael said:
knowing nothing of this channel (live in the us, we have IFC), but seeing that it means independent television, I'll give it the benefit of the doubt and say that they dont get a lot of funding and most of their stuff looks like indie college stuff.

otherwise thats hysterical.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAA. Oh wait, you're serious. ITV is one of the main tv channels in britain. There are five of them

BBC1
BBC2
ITV (they also have 4 different channels and were voted as one of the most popular)
Channel 4
Five

ITV make a ridiculous amount of money from stuff like X factor and Britains Got Talent.
You can't really call them the "Big Five" anymore, they were just the five analogue channels. Since the digital switch (and even before then) I'd say there are the "Big Three" groups; BBC, bSkyb and Virgin. Hell, even Discovery is bigger than ITV now. (I suppose ITV may be considered one of the big pure-bred-british ones, but in these times I don't think that distinction matters much)
 

shadyh8er

New member
Apr 28, 2010
1,778
0
0
HAHAHAHAHA!


Oh God, this is just too much! I just hope this was an honest mistake cuz if not, I will feel safe saying that these guys have a bright future with Fox News.