Kiju said:
Hmn...I view it as this:
There is no such thing as a JRPG. There are only RPGs, and the ones that have a certain artistic flair and gameplay-design to them.
Wow, that's a very unique way of looking at it. It's both stupidly obvious and obviously stupid at once.
First off, the "J" stands for "Japanese". It's not just an arbitrarily-chosen letter, so saying "there are no JRPGs" is sort of like saying "there is no American food" or "there is no British literature". There are also "western" RPGs (there's no "W" because "W" takes three syllables to say).
Yeah...no shit, Sherlock. My point is that they are still RPGs that revolve around leveling up a main character and his/her allies, it's just they tend to have a different mode of play and art style, as you said. If you'll notice, not all JRPGs are menu driven, however. Some of them function like your average Western styled RPG (Tales of Symphonia, for example). And yet they are still lumped under the title of 'JRPG' simply because of the art style. Why not just say they're all RPGs?
I suppose it is a bit off topic, though. JRPGs, if you want to call them that, are all in all fairly stock and standard with their settings and plot. Of course, so are Western RPGs. So I suppose what I'm trying to point out is I don't think it's the region it comes from that matters, so much as if it's a good game or not; JRPG, Western RPG, or whatever...it doesn't matter where it came from. i.e. 'Do you enjoy RPGs?'
Perhaps I do lump things under one genre in general. I could say that, using your examples, some literature came from West Europe instead of East, or perhaps it's Mandarin Chinese cuisine. But, I'm just expressing my view, and I've said it, so I'll just stop now.

(Mainly because my argument was made moot, admittedly. But, I'm a stubborn jerk, so mleh!.)