I thought MW2 did it just right. If you shoot a guy, blood splatter and pool on the ground after he falls over. No heads flying off or limbs being removed. Although excessive gore does have its places, I prefer it to be otherwise.
Does the amount of blood&gore in a game matter to you?
- Thread starter mrhappyface
- Start date
Recommended Videos
This.kiteboy said:it was awesome in fallout 3
i never tire of using a sniper rifle in VATS to the head with the bloody mess perk on
eyeballs EVERYWHEEEERE!
I am amazed when it doesnt behead my foe by sends the pieces all over.
Blood and Gore-Should be a MUST in war games. People dont die in a ketchup explosion (ie MW2)
WaW delivered it pretty well on
It all depends on the game genre... I'd be disappointed if a horror game didn't have blood in it, but it would not be necessary if it were say... Mario Party 8 or something.
I think probably the most realistic game in existence would be a combination of Dead Space's Dead System, combined with Red Faction Guerilla's Geomod 2.0 and 1.0, and the beautiful Crytek engine. The world would be hyper realistic.
Well, I do like atleast semi-realistic eviscerating.
Or the fire axe on l4d2..
But some games fuck it up totally. Cant think of any right now but.
Some games do it perfectly, I cant think of any but still...
Some games do it ok-ish, such as Dragon Age: Origins. The blood splatter was a good idea, but it just doesnt look good..
Or the fire axe on l4d2..
But some games fuck it up totally. Cant think of any right now but.
Some games do it perfectly, I cant think of any but still...
Some games do it ok-ish, such as Dragon Age: Origins. The blood splatter was a good idea, but it just doesnt look good..
Well if only thing the game has to offer is just a blood bath then it's a turn off for me. But blood is still only though
Depends on the Game. Like, one of my favourite games ever in the history of the universe is Little Big Adventure, which is so cutesy and colourful it's almost sickening. But it's an amazing game.
But then if I'm playing something like Soldier of Fortune, Left 4 Dead or something. It's got to be as violent as possible.
I think it's entirely a matter of whether it fits or not.
But then if I'm playing something like Soldier of Fortune, Left 4 Dead or something. It's got to be as violent as possible.
I think it's entirely a matter of whether it fits or not.
Really? It looks more like they got into a food fight at school and are covered in ketchup.Valiance said:
I like having gore in my games because it gives me a sense of satisfaction when I kill an enemy and have his body fly one way, and his head in eight others. It makes me feel like I should plant a flag on their corpse.
all depends on the game....
But most of the time, no not really. In shooters it really doesnt matter at all, and seems like if theres a lot of it... it just seems pointless
But most of the time, no not really. In shooters it really doesnt matter at all, and seems like if theres a lot of it... it just seems pointless
I like realistic gore for what you're doing to a person, just because I find realism increases immersion. However, some really great games feature NO gore, so its not a must.