Frost27 said:
Even though this happened on May 5th of this year, CNN just ran the article now, likely due to the legal proceedings taking so long.
A group of white students wearing T-Shirts bearing the American flag were asked to turn their shirts inside out due to the possibility it could have been inflammatory to the Mexican students at the school on Cinco de Mayo.
The students and their families sued the school on the grounds that their freedom of speech had been infringed and the Judge in Northern California sided with the school.
How do you feel about this?
Quite simply, the kids were assholes, and the school made the right call. The American flag isn't inherently offensive, but they were wearing it with the same intent as someone who shows up to a synagogue wearing a Swastika armband.
Here's an excerpt from the article:
The previous year, in 2009, a group of Mexican students marked the holiday by walking around campus holding a Mexican flag. A group of white students responded by hanging a makeshift American flag from a tree and chanting "USA." According to the Chronicle, tensions flared and the two groups faced off with profanity and threats."
The administrators had this fresh in their minds when, the next year, a group of students were preemptively dressing for some sort of nationalism-fueled racial conflict.
Frost27 said:
Im my personal opinion, I believe that when wearing your nation's flag on your own soil becomes "inflammatory" and unacceptable, the problem is not with the students or the t-shirts or the flag, it is with the Judge and the schools.
*sigh* I wonder if you can hear the whistle of air as the point of the school's action flies over your head.
Frost27 said:
The thought that someone can immigrate from another country and have a holiday from that country (which in the case of Cinco de Mayo, the Mexicans in Mexico don't even really celebrate like we do in the U.S.)
Hang on a second. I'm picking up a rather massive assumption.
Alright, here's my challenge: go through the article and find the section that says the students were Mexican immigrants, and not just with Mexican heritage. Because it sounds like you're just assuming that they are to make yourself feel more justified for railing against them (which is a problem in itself, because it implies that you think immigrated citizens have less rights as Americans than native-born citizens).
Frost27 said:
be grounds for their host country having to hide their flag, we have a problem on many levels. If I were to go to Great Britain and demand that the British flag be covered because it might offend me on the 4th of July, it would cause an uproar.
...wait, what? Okay, I'm going to print this in boldface, simply because it's a rather big point:
T-shirts with American flags on them are not American flags.
On a similar note, where are you getting this notion that the school was suppressing all things American on Cinco de Mayo? You talk about "having to hide their flag" or how this is akin to "demanding that the [flag] be covered," but where does it say that any of that happened?
The only way a US/UK parallel would work is if you had a group of British people shouting down a Fourth of July celebration by drowning it in "God Save the Queen." Nobody was protesting the presence of the American flag, and you're a liar if you claim that they were. The school administrators were responding to a group of students
who had a history of racially-targeted aggression and were gracious enough to wear clothes that made them easily identified before they actually tried something more serious.
They were wearing T-shirts and harboring the intent to disrupt the celebration of another ethnic group's holiday. None of the Mexican students were demanding that the Mexican flag be taken off the flag pole, and I sincerely doubt that they spent their Fourth of July crashing celebrations.
You know what the administrators did? A preemptive strike. And in my mind, that's more American than a bunch of racist kids wearing the flag on T-shirts to incite racial conflict.