We hope it's coming out this year. xDThe Gentleman said:Because apparently "straight, male gamers" are not pandered to enough in games?
This guy knows Duke Nukem Forever is coming out this year, right?
Let me be clear what i meant.Arren Kae said:You must hate Bethesda's RPGs and love JRPGs. Making your own story's the best part of RPGs. Otherwise what are you doing, customizing equipment?Ishiro32 said:The basic idea about RPG is not that you create your own story.
. In good rpg you impact world that's already created. In PnP rpg that's how it works, GM prepare good complex world and story and let the characters roam and impact what they want within the rules of his world. Planescape:Torment, Witcher, Baldurs Gate, Kotor... all were working that way.You should change the world with your actions not world should change to appeal to you
That. but i would changeDesigning a game to please the majority of your audience isn't giving anyone special treatment. Including gay sex scenes and dialogue trees for a negligible minority is special treatment.
With the barely disguised disgust for homosexuals in your previous post, I can't imagine why your numbers may be a bit skewed toward the low end...Arren Kae said:A percent is a ratio, not an amount. It doesn't represent the total # of gay gamers it represents how many gamers, out of every hundred, are gay.
I can think of 2 and 1 bi out of 100+ gamers I know. So probably a smaller percent than that.
I'm a lesbian and 90% of the gamers I know are gay, so challenge your theory to a duel!Arren Kae said:A percent is a ratio, not an amount. It doesn't represent the total # of gay gamers it represents how many gamers, out of every hundred, are gay.
I can think of 2 and 1 bi out of 100+ gamers I know. So probably a smaller percent than that.
NeoGuardian86 said:That really doesn't mean that there are that few LGBT gamers out there though.
NeoGuardian86 said:1) I agree that petition's wrong. Overall, Dragon Age has some solid writing and I'm sure the lead writer has something to do with that. Fortunately, that petition won't carry any weight. If news channels latched onto the story it could get big enough that EA made him apologize but that's as far as it'd likely go.Arren Kae said:That really doesn't mean that there are that few LGBT gamers out there though.
See i agreed with Gaider on the aspect that just because the vast majority may very well be just straight males (like myself included) didn't make it right to tailor games purely only for them. Hell i'm also Muslim, Arab and Saudi, there are no games for me really, typically i'm on the other end of the barrel shooting them - unfortunately.
Also there is this retaded petition to get Gaider fired for stereotyping gays, be that someone else pretending to be gay or not, it's still really wrong.
2) You're right: my personal sample isn't necessarily indicative of national population statistics. But what more trustworthy data is there? You've met more people than would be included in a sample survey. Using your own experience and those of your friends will give you larger sample-groups (more accurate data) than whatever published statistics there are based on surveys or other less-trustworthy info. gathering.
3) You're wrong about who the game's audience should be geared to. For selling a product it makes sense to design it to appeal to most consumers. That doesn't mean I'm a populist (I hate the wii) or that I feel the company has to design according to my wishes. When we're talking objectively about what makes sense there's no alternative. It's irrational to say,
"they should design to appeal to a minority even if it alienates the majority".
Bioware has made a point of having gay characters since Knights of the Old Republic. That's a design choice out of loving homosexuality, not business sense. In previous titles that content was something you had to work to get so players who didn't want to experience it didn't have to. In Dragon Age 2 they made the mistake of having gay characters persistently hit on the player character.
4)Muslim/middle-eastern characters. Hmm, you can play as the terrorist forces in some games. They're the villains in the game's setting but they are middle-eastern + muslim. Tali in Mass Effect definitely has a middle-eastern flare and the whole Quarian race has a gypsy cultural influence. You don't play as her but she's a party member. Those're the only examples I can think of: villains and an alien based on a real-world culture.
Here's a big difference though: most gamers wouldn't care about middle eastern / muslim characters inclusion. In the current environment I'm sure plenty would be bothered if the character was a preachy Muslim but if he just happened to be muslim I don't think most players would care one way or the other. Making such a character the main character would make him less identifiable for the majority of white and Japanese players but there's nothing innately about Muslims or middle-easterners that rubs folks the wrong way (except for folks who want them dead in real lifeand that's a learned stance) like homosexuals. Men don't want hit on by men.
mojodamm said:With the barely disguised disgust for homosexuals in your previous post said:Skewed? Homosexuals are a rarity. Just by probability most of anyone's friends are not gay. You'd have to go out of your way to be an exception.
You've established your RPG gamer cred. We're in agreement. I'd prefer if a character's going to be a lesbian she's always a lesbian so I've some content to unlock with a female character rather than every character wanting my character to get up in them. This could be taken further with classes. A character like Morrigan could turn her nose up at non-mages or (flipping it around) exclusively go for warriors b/c she wants a muscly man.Ishiro32 said:Planescape:Torment,
I am, I'm just saying that the way you said "one woman can be straight and one can be bi" comes off as a little... I'm not really sure.snfonseka said:Not sure whether you are really referring to my post. Because I have never mentioned in my post that "one guy can be straight and one can be gay" (or anything that closely related to the number of gay/ bi or straight characters), besides you are totally missing my point. What I am saying is that sexuality should be a part of the personality; not that there should be a one gay, one bi and one straight.Jamie Doerschuck said:And then one guy can be straight and one can be gay? So anyone who wants to get with women has two choices and anyone who wants to get with guys has one?snfonseka said:They should have introduced some characters as straight, some as bi and some as gay. It is more realistic than turning all the romance-companions into bi characters. They should have approached this sexuality issue in more creative manner, where the sexuality is part of the personality. For example, Merrill is straight and Isabela is bi.
Sorry, just the way you phrased it seemed a little "Well OF COURSE the other woman should be bi. But not the guy. One of those can be gay, because no one cares." in my head..
My problem is that it's inherently offensive to have one character be straight and one be bi.. Because that gives straight people all the choices they want, while gay people would only get one.NeoGuardian86 said:Jamie Doerschuck said:And then one guy can be straight and one can be gay? So anyone who wants to get with women has two choices and anyone who wants to get with guys has one?snfonseka said:They should have introduced some characters as straight, some as bi and some as gay. It is more realistic than turning all the romance-companions into bi characters. They should have approached this sexuality issue in more creative manner, where the sexuality is part of the personality. For example, Merrill is straight and Isabela is bi.
Sorry, just the way you phrased it seemed a little "Well OF COURSE the other woman should be bi. But not the guy. One of those can be gay, because no one cares." in my head..
technically it could go the other way as well - just as you say.
Jesus.. What are you going to do next? Hold up your "GOD HATES FAGS" sign? You just used every cliche in the book as the what homosexuality will "lead to next"...Arren Kae said:Where's the child love interest for pedophiles? Why can't there be sex with Dog for folks into bestiality? Why can't you do an enemy's corpse for folks into necrophilia?
a larger sample size is absolutely no guarantee of a more representative sample. by only talking to your friends you're introducing a huge selection bias.Arren Kae said:2) You're right: my personal sample isn't necessarily indicative of national population statistics. But what more trustworthy data is there? You've met more people than would be included in a sample survey. Using your own experience and those of your friends will give you larger sample-groups (more accurate data) than whatever published statistics there are based on surveys or other less-trustworthy info. gathering.
You're assuming that appealing to a minority will alienate the entire heterosexual majority. Most people don't care either way. The small minority who are offended enough to not buy the game are far outnumbered by the homosexual audience that this kind of content will most appeal to.Arren Kae said:3) You're wrong about who the game's audience should be geared to. For selling a product it makes sense to design it to appeal to most consumers. That doesn't mean I'm a populist (I hate the wii) or that I feel the company has to design according to my wishes. When we're talking objectively about what makes sense there's no alternative. It's irrational to say,
"they should design to appeal to a minority even if it alienates the majority".
Bioware has made a point of having gay characters since Knights of the Old Republic. That's a design choice out of loving homosexuality, not business sense. In previous titles that content was something you had to work to get so players who didn't want to experience it didn't have to. In Dragon Age 2 they made the mistake of having gay characters persistently hit on the player character.
Jamie Doerschuck said:My problem is that it's inherently offensive to have one character be straight and one be bi.. Because that gives straight people all the choices they want, while gay people would only get one.NeoGuardian86 said:Jamie Doerschuck said:And then one guy can be straight and one can be gay? So anyone who wants to get with women has two choices and anyone who wants to get with guys has one?snfonseka said:They should have introduced some characters as straight, some as bi and some as gay. It is more realistic than turning all the romance-companions into bi characters. They should have approached this sexuality issue in more creative manner, where the sexuality is part of the personality. For example, Merrill is straight and Isabela is bi.
Sorry, just the way you phrased it seemed a little "Well OF COURSE the other woman should be bi. But not the guy. One of those can be gay, because no one cares." in my head..
technically it could go the other way as well - just as you say.
Also, the reason I assume that the statement would have been finished out as "and one gay can be straight and one can be gay" is because gay men and women are seen as "lesser groups" in society, so neither of them "should" have any choices...
That set-up really WOULD be pandering to the male demographic. Maybe not the "white male" demographic, but certainly the straight male one.
Sorry, mate, but its most definitely wierdDfskelleton said:Please tell me this isn't weird.
When I read the title, I envisioned a tall oscilating fan sitting in a chair holding one of those WBC "God hates fags" signs, and there was a man jumping out of his computer screen with a shotgun, moments away from shooting him in the face.