Dragon Age 2 Lead Writer Blasts Homophobic Fan

Recommended Videos

Asuka Soryu

New member
Jun 11, 2010
2,437
0
0
The Gentleman said:
Because apparently "straight, male gamers" are not pandered to enough in games?

This guy knows Duke Nukem Forever is coming out this year, right?
We hope it's coming out this year. xD
 

Ishiro32

New member
Mar 28, 2011
48
0
0
Arren Kae said:
Ishiro32 said:
The basic idea about RPG is not that you create your own story.
You must hate Bethesda's RPGs and love JRPGs. Making your own story's the best part of RPGs. Otherwise what are you doing, customizing equipment?
Let me be clear what i meant.
You should change the world with your actions not world should change to appeal to you
. In good rpg you impact world that's already created. In PnP rpg that's how it works, GM prepare good complex world and story and let the characters roam and impact what they want within the rules of his world. Planescape:Torment, Witcher, Baldurs Gate, Kotor... all were working that way.
When you change the orientation of character based on gender of main hero, it's just not rpg. In real rpg you would stumble upon defined BI, o straight and tried to convince him to be gay which should be hard (but could be great story) or oposite.

And FYI i think Elder Scroll series have a lot flaws in rpg manner.

And i want to add something.
Designing a game to please the majority of your audience isn't giving anyone special treatment. Including gay sex scenes and dialogue trees for a negligible minority is special treatment.
That. but i would change
Designing a game to please the majority of your audience isn't giving anyone special treatment. Designing half of the romance content for minority is special treatment.
 

Dr. Whiggs

New member
Jan 12, 2008
476
0
0
I have permission from the creator to continue making everyone in Dragon Age gay as a picnic! Hooray!
 

Midnight Crossroads

New member
Jul 17, 2010
1,912
0
0
Way to be a professional, Lead Writer. You've joined Uwe Boll in an exclusive club. Take a lesson from Marcus Aurelius and ignore inconsequential fools.
 

OutforEC

Professional Amateur
Jul 20, 2010
427
0
0
Arren Kae said:
A percent is a ratio, not an amount. It doesn't represent the total # of gay gamers it represents how many gamers, out of every hundred, are gay.

I can think of 2 and 1 bi out of 100+ gamers I know. So probably a smaller percent than that.
With the barely disguised disgust for homosexuals in your previous post, I can't imagine why your numbers may be a bit skewed toward the low end...
 

Orc Town Grot

New member
Mar 11, 2011
37
0
0
point taken. I don't hate the romances that much, just think its childish an unneccessary (Yeah and killing fantasy enemies is mature and necessary, I know, its an impossible moral split LOL). Promise you this whole topic is a no win topic.
 

Nemu

In my hand I hold a key...
Oct 14, 2009
1,278
0
0
Arren Kae said:
A percent is a ratio, not an amount. It doesn't represent the total # of gay gamers it represents how many gamers, out of every hundred, are gay.

I can think of 2 and 1 bi out of 100+ gamers I know. So probably a smaller percent than that.
I'm a lesbian and 90% of the gamers I know are gay, so challenge your theory to a duel!

NeoGuardian86 said:
That really doesn't mean that there are that few LGBT gamers out there though.

Quote bolded for truth.



OT: I always wondered if the folks, like the poster on the Bioware forums, ever take into account that gay people don't necessarily feel "comfortable" with their straight-romance-only options. Plus, just because we're gay, it doesn't mean we like the gay/bi options in-game, either. Just get over it, it's only a game so stop taking it so seriously, ffs.
 

Arren Kae

New member
Nov 10, 2010
73
0
0
NeoGuardian86 said:
Arren Kae said:
That really doesn't mean that there are that few LGBT gamers out there though.

See i agreed with Gaider on the aspect that just because the vast majority may very well be just straight males (like myself included) didn't make it right to tailor games purely only for them. Hell i'm also Muslim, Arab and Saudi, there are no games for me really, typically i'm on the other end of the barrel shooting them - unfortunately.


Also there is this retaded petition to get Gaider fired for stereotyping gays, be that someone else pretending to be gay or not, it's still really wrong.
1) I agree that petition's wrong. Overall, Dragon Age has some solid writing and I'm sure the lead writer has something to do with that. Fortunately, that petition won't carry any weight. If news channels latched onto the story it could get big enough that EA made him apologize but that's as far as it'd likely go.

2) You're right: my personal sample isn't necessarily indicative of national population statistics. But what more trustworthy data is there? You've met more people than would be included in a sample survey. Using your own experience and those of your friends will give you larger sample-groups (more accurate data) than whatever published statistics there are based on surveys or other less-trustworthy info. gathering.

3) You're wrong about who the game's audience should be geared to. For selling a product it makes sense to design it to appeal to most consumers. That doesn't mean I'm a populist (I hate the wii) or that I feel the company has to design according to my wishes. When we're talking objectively about what makes sense there's no alternative. It's irrational to say,
"they should design to appeal to a minority even if it alienates the majority".
Bioware has made a point of having gay characters since Knights of the Old Republic. That's a design choice out of loving homosexuality, not business sense. In previous titles that content was something you had to work to get so players who didn't want to experience it didn't have to. In Dragon Age 2 they made the mistake of having gay characters persistently hit on the player character.

4)Muslim/middle-eastern characters. Hmm, you can play as the terrorist forces in some games. They're the villains in the game's setting but they are middle-eastern + muslim. Tali in Mass Effect definitely has a middle-eastern flare and the whole Quarian race has a gypsy cultural influence. You don't play as her but she's a party member. Those're the only examples I can think of: villains and an alien based on a real-world culture.
Here's a big difference though: most gamers wouldn't care about middle eastern / muslim characters inclusion. In the current environment I'm sure plenty would be bothered if the character was a preachy Muslim but if he just happened to be muslim I don't think most players would care one way or the other. Making such a character the main character would make him less identifiable for the majority of white and Japanese players but there's nothing innately about Muslims or middle-easterners that rubs folks the wrong way (except for folks who want them dead in real life :( and that's a learned stance) like homosexuals. Men don't want hit on by men.
 

Arren Kae

New member
Nov 10, 2010
73
0
0
mojodamm said:
With the barely disguised disgust for homosexuals in your previous post said:
Skewed? Homosexuals are a rarity. Just by probability most of anyone's friends are not gay. You'd have to go out of your way to be an exception.
 

Arren Kae

New member
Nov 10, 2010
73
0
0
Ishiro32 said:
Planescape:Torment,
You've established your RPG gamer cred. We're in agreement. I'd prefer if a character's going to be a lesbian she's always a lesbian so I've some content to unlock with a female character rather than every character wanting my character to get up in them. This could be taken further with classes. A character like Morrigan could turn her nose up at non-mages or (flipping it around) exclusively go for warriors b/c she wants a muscly man.
 
Sep 14, 2009
80
0
0
I'm cool with the dude love but I just wish there were more women options. I am not interested in having my character sleep with a guy. And there are only like 2 sucky choices for women.
 

Jamie Doerschuck

New member
Jun 6, 2010
72
0
0
snfonseka said:
Jamie Doerschuck said:
snfonseka said:
They should have introduced some characters as straight, some as bi and some as gay. It is more realistic than turning all the romance-companions into bi characters. They should have approached this sexuality issue in more creative manner, where the sexuality is part of the personality. For example, Merrill is straight and Isabela is bi.
And then one guy can be straight and one can be gay? So anyone who wants to get with women has two choices and anyone who wants to get with guys has one?

Sorry, just the way you phrased it seemed a little "Well OF COURSE the other woman should be bi. But not the guy. One of those can be gay, because no one cares." in my head..
Not sure whether you are really referring to my post. Because I have never mentioned in my post that "one guy can be straight and one can be gay" (or anything that closely related to the number of gay/ bi or straight characters), besides you are totally missing my point. What I am saying is that sexuality should be a part of the personality; not that there should be a one gay, one bi and one straight.
I am, I'm just saying that the way you said "one woman can be straight and one can be bi" comes off as a little... I'm not really sure.

If one was straight and one was bi then people choosing to play as a male Hawke would have two choices and someone playing as a lesbian would only have one. By default. With no thinking involved. And why is it that the other women has to be bi? Why can't she just be a lesbian?

I guess it just comes off as some weird cross of homophobic/sexist.. I'm not really sure what, I just find it offensive.

And if you, or most other people, had finished out that thought then one guy would have been straight and one would have been gay. Just because the only people trying to "get with" them would be gay men or women, who are generally seen as less important in society.

The way you phrased it just kind of comes off.. Bad.

That's my beef..
 

Jamie Doerschuck

New member
Jun 6, 2010
72
0
0
NeoGuardian86 said:
Jamie Doerschuck said:
snfonseka said:
They should have introduced some characters as straight, some as bi and some as gay. It is more realistic than turning all the romance-companions into bi characters. They should have approached this sexuality issue in more creative manner, where the sexuality is part of the personality. For example, Merrill is straight and Isabela is bi.
And then one guy can be straight and one can be gay? So anyone who wants to get with women has two choices and anyone who wants to get with guys has one?

Sorry, just the way you phrased it seemed a little "Well OF COURSE the other woman should be bi. But not the guy. One of those can be gay, because no one cares." in my head..

technically it could go the other way as well - just as you say.
My problem is that it's inherently offensive to have one character be straight and one be bi.. Because that gives straight people all the choices they want, while gay people would only get one.

Also, the reason I assume that the statement would have been finished out as "and one gay can be straight and one can be gay" is because gay men and women are seen as "lesser groups" in society, so neither of them "should" have any choices...

That set-up really WOULD be pandering to the male demographic. Maybe not the "white male" demographic, but certainly the straight male one.
 

Jamie Doerschuck

New member
Jun 6, 2010
72
0
0
Arren Kae said:
Where's the child love interest for pedophiles? Why can't there be sex with Dog for folks into bestiality? Why can't you do an enemy's corpse for folks into necrophilia?
Jesus.. What are you going to do next? Hold up your "GOD HATES FAGS" sign? You just used every cliche in the book as the what homosexuality will "lead to next"...
 

cobra_ky

New member
Nov 20, 2008
1,643
0
0
Arren Kae said:
2) You're right: my personal sample isn't necessarily indicative of national population statistics. But what more trustworthy data is there? You've met more people than would be included in a sample survey. Using your own experience and those of your friends will give you larger sample-groups (more accurate data) than whatever published statistics there are based on surveys or other less-trustworthy info. gathering.
a larger sample size is absolutely no guarantee of a more representative sample. by only talking to your friends you're introducing a huge selection bias.

but if sample sizes are what impress you, here's a survey with 10,000 respondents, 23% of whom identified as "completely homosexual". (Of course as a voluntary survey that number is probably skewed towards homosexuals).

Arren Kae said:
3) You're wrong about who the game's audience should be geared to. For selling a product it makes sense to design it to appeal to most consumers. That doesn't mean I'm a populist (I hate the wii) or that I feel the company has to design according to my wishes. When we're talking objectively about what makes sense there's no alternative. It's irrational to say,
"they should design to appeal to a minority even if it alienates the majority".
Bioware has made a point of having gay characters since Knights of the Old Republic. That's a design choice out of loving homosexuality, not business sense. In previous titles that content was something you had to work to get so players who didn't want to experience it didn't have to. In Dragon Age 2 they made the mistake of having gay characters persistently hit on the player character.
You're assuming that appealing to a minority will alienate the entire heterosexual majority. Most people don't care either way. The small minority who are offended enough to not buy the game are far outnumbered by the homosexual audience that this kind of content will most appeal to.
 

NeoGuardian86

New member
Mar 26, 2011
26
0
0
Jamie Doerschuck said:
NeoGuardian86 said:
Jamie Doerschuck said:
snfonseka said:
They should have introduced some characters as straight, some as bi and some as gay. It is more realistic than turning all the romance-companions into bi characters. They should have approached this sexuality issue in more creative manner, where the sexuality is part of the personality. For example, Merrill is straight and Isabela is bi.
And then one guy can be straight and one can be gay? So anyone who wants to get with women has two choices and anyone who wants to get with guys has one?

Sorry, just the way you phrased it seemed a little "Well OF COURSE the other woman should be bi. But not the guy. One of those can be gay, because no one cares." in my head..

technically it could go the other way as well - just as you say.
My problem is that it's inherently offensive to have one character be straight and one be bi.. Because that gives straight people all the choices they want, while gay people would only get one.

Also, the reason I assume that the statement would have been finished out as "and one gay can be straight and one can be gay" is because gay men and women are seen as "lesser groups" in society, so neither of them "should" have any choices...

That set-up really WOULD be pandering to the male demographic. Maybe not the "white male" demographic, but certainly the straight male one.

When i said it could the other way as well. as in one bi and one gay/lesbian.

Seriously my point boils down to this.

Limitation/Exclusiveness in the LI department should not be looked on as a bad thing.

Do not make every LI available simply for the sake of demographic X is gonna pitch a *****. If the character fits that he/she would be interested in x,y,z. then so be it. That's what i call good character building.

If they made Merrill (like in my example) a lesbian character, i know people are gonna *****, but if it makes sense in her story, it works. (this applies to a gay male character as well)

Also having a gay or lesbian character shouldn't be seen as lesser, if you love the character and they happen to be that way then it really does - in my opinion - give the opposite impression.

and personally speaking i didn't feel it or believe it that all 4 were all BI.

That's all really.
 

ScoopMeister

New member
Mar 12, 2011
651
0
0
Dfskelleton said:
Please tell me this isn't weird.
When I read the title, I envisioned a tall oscilating fan sitting in a chair holding one of those WBC "God hates fags" signs, and there was a man jumping out of his computer screen with a shotgun, moments away from shooting him in the face.
Sorry, mate, but its most definitely wierd