Knife said:
As an ex-soldier who happens to be a marksman I can hit a fist sized object from 50 meters away or a torso sized object from 300 meters away easy. Or twice smaller objects if they're immobile.
I know that wasn't your point, but you just drew my attention on the phrase "twice smaller". What's that even supposed to mean? Smallness can't be measured. There just isn't a value or unit for it. You might be able to define one by saying that smallness=1/size, as we do with resistivity or conductivity depending on the situation, which would mean that "twice as small" actually means "half as big", but even that would be incorrect, because you actually said "twice smaller". So the object would be smaller than the other one by two iterations. Since I live in a metric country, the basic iteration for length would be a meter. That would result in (since you were comparing to fists) about -1.8 meters (for a large fist). That is not possible, so, as an engineer, I presume the next likely iteration: 1 millimeter. So you can shoot something a little smaller than a fist (keeping with the "large fist" I proposed, about 18mm) if it is not moving.
The same happens all the time. People even say "twice larger" or something like that if they mean "twice as large". Supposing their basic increment in this case was the size of the object, what they actually said was "three times as large".
Saltyk said:
#2. Shooting a person in the leg is just as likely to kill them as shooting them in the torso. The Femoral artery is a very large artery in your leg. So much as nicking that will cause a person to bleed out in a few minutes. If the bullet hits the bone, it could shatter and send shrapnel throughout the leg. Seriously, shooting a person in the leg is potentially just as deadly.
Now I'm no medic, but from what little I know of first aid external bleeding can usually be stopped pretty quickly and efficiently and people can survive amputated limbs, no such luck with torso injuries. While a leg injury could potentially be deadly so could the common cold, just because something is as possible doesn't mean it is as likely.
I got a pretty good education on emergency medicine, and internal bleeding, no matter in which bodypart, is almost certainly deadly unless the injured person undergoes surgery within a few minutes. It does take a while before someone goes unconscious from a leg wound, though, so even with a badly damaged leg artery, they can still be quite dangerous, despite being doomed to die. I think that's what he was referring to.
BonGookKumBop said:
What ignorance drives me crazy? "Carbon"
Ignorant people around the world are trained to run in fear every time they hear about "carbon emissions." I'm tired of hearing, "everyone knows carbon is destroying the planet." To illustrate, I give you an actual anecdote of cringe worthy carbon ignorance.
Now I understand that people don't want to destroy the planet and I applaud them for that, but I do wish they would understand what they were talking about before getting passionate.
This also work in the other way. People keep fighting for "organic" food. I never really understand why. So far, no one I know ever proposed using anorganic materials as food. "Organic" means everything that contains carbon, and seemingly no one gets it right.
On a similar note, food producers seriously started selling "gene-free" popcorn in a store nearby. "GENE-FREE"!!! I don't think I want to know what it was made of. Obviously not corn seeds. All plants contain genes, after all.
Aurora Firestorm said:
There does seem to be a much larger variety in American cartoon styles than Japanese manga character styles. Hm.
It bugs the hell out of me when people don't know the difference between "electrician" and "electrical engineer." As an EE major, I can't wire your house up, because I don't know all the complex rules for doing so. I can, however, design all kinds of fancy electronics. These are completely different things, even if their core theory is the same.
Ooooh, yes...
In my first semester of EE, I used some free time on a youth weekend I helped organise to study for an exam. We "only" did DC and digital circuits that semester, and one of the other helpers that time was learning to become an electrician. When I sat there with my 8-transistors-grid, setting up the proper equations (I think it was the internal circuit of an OP-Amp), she started talking to me about light fixtures and such, and said that I can't be very good at my subject if I don't know if the live wire is connected to the threading or the spring in the part that hold the bulb. I still don't know if there is an official rule, but I made myself a pretty sensible one I think. Whenever I put a switch somewhere myself I make sure it cuts the live wire (most switches only work on one of them), and when connecting light fictures I try to connect the live wire to the flat spring part in the middle (so that the threading is still safe in case you forget that the bulb is just broken, but the power still on).
Marcus Kehoe said:
Whenever people have yard sales and either have nothing but garbage or overprice everything. Give the stuff to salvation army and lower the price or don't have a yard-sale. Also people who have a yard-sale every week, throw the stuff away or donate it, I'm pretty sure their is a law about it.
Aaaaaaargh!!! It's! Not! That! Difficult!!!
http://theoatmeal.com/comics/misspelling
Zen Toombs said:
Blablahb said:
[Polyamory] must be denied because otherwise in no time emancipation would be destroyed because people are allowed to have harems of several women again.
Erm, how? For one: most of the people that I know of that are Poly are women, not men who want a constant "3+some". B: a basic premise of polyamory is that everything is consensual. Three or C: so long as everything is consensual, how are women's rights involved with this? And coming in a very low four, or D, or that little (iv) in brackets they use in footnotes: Wine.
How do alcoholic beverages matter in this case?