Michael Jaynes said:
Axolotl said:
JIst00 said:
He wasn't calling people who enjoyed or even went to see The Expendables "the worst sort of person". He was referring to dudes who are nothing but machismo and believe that 80's action movies were the pinnacle of film making. If you liked Kill Bill, or Hero, or any movie that involved kung-fu, a female protagonist, or well-choreographed fight scenes, then.. he wasn't directing that insult at you.
But that's not how it came across in the review. Now Kill Bill is one of my all time favorite films and I loved Hero as well. Yet I still felt somewhat offended by his statements and hell I'm not even a fan of 80's action.
Now if he'd started this review of with a clarification or an apology all would have been forgiven, but he didn't. He opened with a lame strawman. So people are going to keep on complaining.
That's exactly how it came across in the original review. Just because you people didn't 'get it' is not his fault; the rest of us did, and we enjoyed the candor.
Let me explain something most people learn in high school children (I'm using that term because it appears that ~80% of the people arguing against Bob can't use English above a Grade 7 level): descriptive expansion. See, descriptive expansion falls under five categories:
Comparisons
Reasons
Examples
Statistics
Testimony
Bob brought up the Expendables again because it made a good point in
comparison to Piranha 3D. The 'strawmanning' (actually, comedic exaggeration, as a fellow reader put it) argument is actually quite comical to me. It's an argument that was yelled to the rafters the entire Expendables thread: "But it doesn't have to be good! Sometimes people just want to see mindless drivel featuring famous stars and explosions!". I'm not even exaggerating about this. Go to the Expendables comment thread and find several hundred comments along those lines.
Bob addresses the point, and not a single person is arguing against it any more. Isn't it interesting how fault-finders are content to just be pissy at something until it is addressed/proven wrong, and then move on to the next thing to be pissy at for no real understandable reason? I call it the Fox News loophole.