Actually, have you seen Stallone and Lundgren's comments about current action movies including superhero films? I have rarely seen comments as insecure as these:IronStorm9 said:But that's just what the movie was. It had no substance, you could switch the actors in and out and no one could tell the difference, and two of the best 80s movies actors (Willis and Schwarzenegger) only get cameos. I saw an interview with Stallone on TV and he said he only picked them because he thought they were pathetically imitating him and he made several comments along the lines of "They're over the hill".Hubilub said:Yes he is! Actually, it's worse. He's insulting people who like the movie's premise.IronStorm9 said:He's not insulting the people who like the movie.
And even then, how the hell does saying that Stallone is cashing in on this film makes sense? Stallone is one of the most respectable directors out there, he's the last person to do a movie simply for a cash-in
Hahaha, I did NAAAHT.Eicha said:Well, nobody saw THAT coming. NAAAAT.
He didn't bury them he just raged impotently against the film because it pissed all over his preferred niche market film at the box office.standokan said:Thank you MovieBob for putting the expendebles where they belong, six feet under the ground.
I feel the need to echo other people's (Hubilub's, mainly) statements and call MovieBob out on his elitism. I have not personally seen any movie in a really really long time - but it's pretty obvious that today's "review" was all about irrational hate. I'd go as far as to say "he's not like himself". But seriously, for someone who constantly demands from us all to stop being elitist nerds, there's way too much hate on the so-called "jocks" and "sheeple".Hubilub said:I'm going to call it:
MovieBob is a hypocrite.
He complains that the people on earth are sheep following the word of the media and that we need to make our own decisions. BULLSHIT. That's not what he wants. He wants to be the one the sheep follow! That's why he's frustrated right now. A majority of people don't do what he thinks they should do, so he claims that they are sheep. What, so if we follow your word and just watch Scott Pilgrim instead of the Expendables we're not sheep?
Does he realize that Scott Pilgrim isn't AT ALL as appealing as The Expendables? Does he realize that Scott Pilgrim is aimed for a much smaller audience than the Expendables? If he doesn't, he's a moron. If he does, then he is frustrated because people won't go to see a film not meant for them, which, again, shows how he wants everyone to be his sheep, following his words. Anyone who doesn't? In Bob's eyes, they are the sheep of the media, explosion hungry idiots who don't deserve to watch films.
He's even worse than fucking Yahtzee! Yahtzee at least doesn't pretend to be anything else than someone who insults people that don't agree with him. Bob tries to make himself look like a god amongst nerds we all should follow, and when we don't, he starts to whine.
No, the film is not a cash-in. The movie was a dumb action-film, but that doesn't make it a cash-in.IronStorm9 said:But that's just what the movie was. It had no substance, you could switch the actors in and out and no one could tell the difference, and two of the best 80s movies actors (Willis and Schwarzenegger) only get cameos. I saw an interview with Stallone on TV and he said he only picked them because he thought they were pathetically imitating him and he made several comments along the lines of "They're over the hill".Hubilub said:Yes he is! Actually, it's worse. He's insulting people who like the movie's premise.IronStorm9 said:He's not insulting the people who like the movie.
And even then, how the hell does saying that Stallone is cashing in on this film makes sense? Stallone is one of the most respectable directors out there, he's the last person to do a movie simply for a cash-in
... O HAI MARKEkonk said:Hahaha, I did NAAAHT.Eicha said:Well, nobody saw THAT coming. NAAAAT.
O HAI HUBILUB. Yeah, I was. Best movie evar.Hubilub said:... O HAI MARKEkonk said:Hahaha, I did NAAAHT.Eicha said:Well, nobody saw THAT coming. NAAAAT.
[sub]I really hope you were meaning to make a The Room reference[/sub]
Good for you. Bob is right that this movie won't matter in 5 years, but with a few exceptions it delivers what it's advertised well enough. Sly tried to add a dramatic scene which Rourke delivers great, but is out of place and very "tried". The action was something I complained about, as it was not as bad as Transformers, but did look like it was shot so they could cut corners. It was nostalgia, it was some fairly mindless entertainment. It was meaningless, but fun.FargoDog said:And yet I'm still going to see it.