I tried to. They refuse to believe that my not-so-popular (i.e. Catholic) opinion may, in fact, have some freaking merit due to my religious background. I give up on such debates now: people refuse to hear what they don't agree with.
Whoa. lay of the weedTjebbe said:Well, one could raise the point that in fact, on a global scale, it currently takes more computing resources to keep World of Warcraft running than it does Crysis. Even though one needs a less stellar PC to play WoW (although having a better one really does help in busy places, or at least it used to), the amount of Crysis players is nothing compared to WoW. Not to mention the fact that is takes quite a few servers to have the clients even be able to present the worlds to the players.Megacherv said:I normally have arguments with this stubborn idiot named George. He always tries to beat me in aruments about gaming and technology, and he loses all the time. For example, he claims that Crysis isn't as resource-hungry as World of Warcraft, yet he refused to believe I was right. He's also a team-killing shit aswell. Just thought I'd add that in there.
Should that line of reasoning fail, one could also mention that 'resource-hungry' might not refer to computing resources, but rather to financial resources of the players.
In both cases, the actual argument would probably quickly recede to the mutual agreement that the original terms were a little bit under-defined.
I'll stop now![]()
You do realize that you actually spelled F#ck*ng with an asterisk in it?Kingcallum said:EVERY FU*CKING DAY
Not yet, but if you quote me things might be about to change.crazyhaircut94 said:I've done it several times, with most people I meet on a daily basis in school have the intellect and depth of a two-dimensional boy from the caveman era.
Take this for example: I was talking to a friend of mine (he's not an idiot really, but he talked so dearly about something he doesn't even have any bloody information about), and we were arguing over good game series. For some weird reason, he thinks that every FPS the latest years are ripping off Halo 3, and he doesn't even own a 360, he's only played parts of the multiplayer with me and some friends, and he hasn't even seen that many FPS's.
Doesn't it strike anyone as a blind shot for someone to accuse Rainbow Six Vegas 2, a tactical modern-day shooter on Earth, with normal army weapons, fighting some secret organization or something (haven't played through the game), to be a rip-off of Halo 3, an FPS with purple, weird-shaped weapons set 500 years in the future, where you fight against some big alien cult that believe that rings equals gods? It's like comparing Gears of War to Doom! I know that it's fun to argue, but if you haven't got information about any games, you already know that you will lose against someone who's played games his entire life! This is just like categorizing an entire game genre as a ripoff of the first game IN the genre! Now, if you excuse me, I'm going to hit my head with a frying pan.
EDIT: Thanks for correcting me, curlycrouton.
crazyhaircut94 said:I've done it several times, with most people I meet on a daily basis in school have the intellect and depth of a two-dimensional boy from the caveman era.
Take this for example: I was talking to a friend of mine (he's not an idiot really, but he talked so dearly about something he doesn't even have any bloody information about), and we were arguing over good game series. For some weird reason, he thinks that every FPS the latest years are ripping off Halo 3, and he doesn't even own a 360, he's only played parts of the multiplayer with me and some friends, and he hasn't even seen that many FPS's.
Doesn't it strike anyone as a blind shot for someone to accuse Rainbow Six Vegas 2, a tactical modern-day shooter on Earth, with normal army weapons, fighting some secret organization or something (haven't played through the game), to be a rip-off of Halo 3, an FPS with purple, weird-shaped weapons set 500 years in the future, where you fight against some big alien cult that believe that rings equals gods? It's like comparing Gears of War to Doom! I know that it's fun to argue, but if you haven't got information about any games, you already know that you will lose against someone who's played games his entire life! This is just like categorizing an entire game genre as a ripoff of the first game IN the genre! Now, if you excuse me, I'm going to hit my head with a frying pan.
EDIT: Thanks for correcting me, curlycrouton.
Yes,yes. Very,very true.Anachronism said:And others have reasoning that makes you genuinely frightened at how their thought processes work.Grimm91 said:I must say tho some idiots have some really entertaining reasoning.
Damn straight, boy.Nazulu said:Oh, Sorry! *runs and hides*samaritan.squirrel said:??I was being sarcastic.Nazulu said:I can't tell, are the people who prefer Master Chief idiots or are you? I guess it would be you since you never played a Metroid game before!samaritan.squirrel said:People who claim that the Master Chief could defeat Samus Aran in single combat baffle me.
Samus has the sheer firepower advantage.
But her weaponry is 'boring and gay' and she's a girl, so I guess they're right -_-