michiehoward said:
I hate to pop the bubble of the above posters, that these girls are having babies so they can selfishly have someone to love and love them in return. But it is much much worse then that.
Overwhelmingly in the cases I witness everyday. Its girls who will not for whatever reason do what life dictates. Go to school, get job, support self.
In my country we have welfare, and for low to middle class we have the CCTB, which is lovingly and truthfully named "Baby Bonus", this monthly money is given to take care of children, whether it be child care cost or diapers, its to supplement whatever other income a mother has.
Now say mother has 2 kids and is on welfare, here in Ontario, she may get 900 to 1000 dollars. The majority of that will go to rent. (hopefully)
For two children on a low income mother Baby Bonus will be $940 or so, if the kids are under 6.
Now for my proof that these "girls" aren't having babies for someone to love.
First hand example. Girl has two kids alittle over a year apart, our welfare system on the main will leave you alone (as in not force you to at least job search with the threat of being cut off) But once children reach the age where they can attend Kindergarten, they will start suspending you monthly. So to prevent this, the winter before children start all day school and kindergarten girl get pregnant and has another child before or around school starts. Welfare fucks off again for another 4 years and Baby Bonus goes up another 500 or so dollars.
So do you see the pattern. I have seen this with not just one person I know personally but with over a dozen. The worst starting popping out kids at 15.
Some things seem a bit... off, with your post.
Firstly: "Its girls who will not for whatever reason do what life dictates."
Right, that's what you said and I first thing I notice, it ain't what "life" dictates, it's what society dictates.
Second thing I notice, good for them! Now, I'm talking as a radical communist revolutionary here, but fuck society! Don't tie yourself down to what society expects of you!
My point is, you say that line as if it's a bad thing, which seems strange to me. And if these mothers can get away with living this life as you say, then why should we stop them? It's perfectly legal and maybe having loads of sprogs is how they want to live! What right do we have to stop them?
Secondly: Babies are a lot of work man, financially you gotta feed them, clothe them, house them, care for them, send them to school, possibly university. That's a lot of money there, these mothers will hardly be living the easy life.
And babies are a lot of hard work in other ways to, especially since a baby for the first few years is effectively a potato that screams at you and attempts to plug it's fingers into sockets and as they get older they don't get any less screamy or accidentally suicidal, they simply get better at getting into bad situations. These mothers aren't going to be living the slacker lifestyle.
Thirdly: I know you're all excited about your teen mother/child benefits conspiracy thing, but stop to consider why we have child benefits. No, nevermind, I'll tell you, because the child shouldn't have to suffer if the parent can't get money. Now, that's something pretty damn fundamental that I don't think we'll argue with, and it isn't worth snipping the possible exploits of child benefits, because you risk compormising it's central reason for existence. Geez.
Edit: Fourthly, the fact that just having kids is financially sustainable (a rather dubious "fact") isn't proof that *all* teen mothers are doing it for the cash.