Fable 3 officially announced
- Thread starter Rusty Bucket
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Once again begins Mr. Molyneux's infamous hype.
And, once again, I'll believe every second of it.
And, once again, I'll believe every second of it.
Maybe if we make Peter play his fable games then make him play Oblivion or Fallout 3 he will understand what a game that lets you make your own choices should be like, but thats a big maybe.
So its going along in time eh? So if Fable 4 or 5 doesnt allow you machine guns and RPG's. I will be seriously dissapointed...
This. If anyone wants to enjoy this game, then I suggest you ignore everything that comes out of Molyneux's mouth from now until the game is released.PedroSteckecilo said:
Personally, I won't be handing over money for this, I was far too disappointed in 2.
Could be interesting as long as it's not too pretentious.
More freedom in how your character looks, not starting off as a kid and a choice of animals for your side-kick (if they're keeping that from the last one) would be nice.
Not sold on the "leading the kingdom" bit. The option to lead the kingdom would be better.
More freedom in how your character looks, not starting off as a kid and a choice of animals for your side-kick (if they're keeping that from the last one) would be nice.
Not sold on the "leading the kingdom" bit. The option to lead the kingdom would be better.
I don't know...
I'm one of the few people who enjoyed Fable more than it's sequel. I appreciate the layers of influence Molyneux is trying to stack into the game so that it can really feel like you're having an impact on the world, but maybe he could start by giving the citizens more of a short-term memory. If your alignment is "good", then all you have to do to make up for stabbing someone in the throat is walk to the next screen, then come back. All will be forgotten!
If he fixed that, then maybe it would feel like I'm actually influencing the world, rather than simply playing an invisible numbers game.
And I get SO tired of him claiming he's going to reinvent the wheel. No, you're not. The wheel works just fine. If you have a better idea, implement it. Don't say you're tearing down the foundations of a very popular genre.
On a side note, did he really call Che Guevara a wonderful amazing person? He was a revolutionary, and there can certainly be a case made that certain regions would have been better off had he succeeded there. But wonderful and amazing? He travelled from region to region inciting violence. He wasn't a man of the people. He was a communist revolutionary for hire.
I'm one of the few people who enjoyed Fable more than it's sequel. I appreciate the layers of influence Molyneux is trying to stack into the game so that it can really feel like you're having an impact on the world, but maybe he could start by giving the citizens more of a short-term memory. If your alignment is "good", then all you have to do to make up for stabbing someone in the throat is walk to the next screen, then come back. All will be forgotten!
If he fixed that, then maybe it would feel like I'm actually influencing the world, rather than simply playing an invisible numbers game.
And I get SO tired of him claiming he's going to reinvent the wheel. No, you're not. The wheel works just fine. If you have a better idea, implement it. Don't say you're tearing down the foundations of a very popular genre.
On a side note, did he really call Che Guevara a wonderful amazing person? He was a revolutionary, and there can certainly be a case made that certain regions would have been better off had he succeeded there. But wonderful and amazing? He travelled from region to region inciting violence. He wasn't a man of the people. He was a communist revolutionary for hire.
Hmm, true. Okay maybe a large improvement. Consisting of:diga1994 said:
A larger, more open world
More spells
Revamped combat system (I.E. Fable 1 magic, dodging and enemies standing a chance)
More customization
A better economy system
Monsters dropping money, or you get more from questing (Please lord)
A deeper, more immersive moral choice thing.
Different looking weapons, and more weapon types
And I think that just about covers it.
I like that it's coming out...but I don't think I'll pay full price for it. Fable 2, although fun at parts was way too short.
I always thought that being king should mean some governmental power. I like the idea, and I would like to see where he goes with it.
Ancient powerful heroes fighting with RPG's and magic. If they can't make a cool game out of that premise, then Lionhead just isn't trying hard enough.dragon_of_red said:
EDIT: Wait, isn't that sort of what Mass Effect did?... well, it worked. And in the case of Mass Effect, minus the ancient heroes bit.
And several months before that the same thing happened with Jonathan Ross.happysock said:
I for one am looking forward to playing this graphical adventure that doesn't have interesting characters, puzzles, areas or story.... Oh, who am I kidding, I never really liked Fable, no matter how many chances I gave it.
