SevenStarSonata said:
The Sorrow said:
Okay, please shut up.
It's from the graphic novel. The exponentially SUPERIOR graphic novel.
Fuck your non-Alan-Moore-involved movie and fuck you for not having read it.
e___e I bow down to your clearly superior people skills. Way to calmly and civilly express your opinions! Whoo, go you!
And for the record, I
have read the graphic novel. However, I am not a particular fan of Alan Moore's style, and furthermore found the movie to be much more easily relatable to me as an American, given that the original graphic novel was a commentary on Margaret Thatcher's 1980's London/England, whereas the movie was much more obviously a commentary on Big-Brother style present governments. It's much easier and more pleasant for an audience to relate to a fighting-for-justice vigilante and the young woman who happened to get caught up in his fight than to relate to a violent anarchist and a young prostitute.
And by the way, your comment on the movie not involving Alan Moore...in case you haven't noticed, every time a movie has been made of one of his works, he's given the go-ahead and then, later on in production, suddenly decided that he wants nothing to do with it and publicly shunned it. It's what he does, not a commentary on the quality of the movie itself.
Relatable main characters don't instantly make the movie better.
Can you relate to the physical manifestation of Dream better than you can some random everyman hero?
Does that make Sandman any less wonderful?
Can you relate to a psychotic man convinced that his mask is his face, throws civilians down elevator shafts, and is an all-around brutal sociopath?
Is Watchmen not one of the greatest examples of the genre ever produced?
One of the MAIN POINTS of V for Vendetta is that he was fighting for anarchy. Not truth, not justice. Anarchy.
Another point is that you're never certain that V is the good guy. The government, while admittedly fascist, is NEVER SHOWN TO BE OUTRIGHT EVIL. Just totalitarian.
The movie stripped that gray factor away into a stereotypical good vs. evil story. They dumbed-down the story to increase appeal.
And I don't care for that.
And if you read the novel, why did you claim I quoted the movie incorrectly?