Favourite "Guilty Pleasure" Movie
- Thread starter prince_xedar
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Spice World. It's horribly written, they can't act and they spend far less time showing off skin than necessary for any guy to like it but I fucking love it.
Also Baby Spice was responsible for my crippling chupa chup addiction from 97-99
Also Baby Spice was responsible for my crippling chupa chup addiction from 97-99
I really don't have just one, but Drive Angry is my favorite this year, or Suckerpunch. Either one, really... Then again, Suckerpunch wasn't what I would consider a bad movie, so I guess just Drive Angry.
i liked suckerpunchSpade Lead said:
i thought it didnt deserve all the shit it got. Ok Browning was wooden and the script jumped abit but it worked
Havoc.
Awful story, awful characters... everything awful you can imagine, but it features a lot of nudity with Anne Hathaway.
Nomnomnom.
Awful story, awful characters... everything awful you can imagine, but it features a lot of nudity with Anne Hathaway.
Nomnomnom.
i love 300, in reality i should hate it. but i love the over-the-topness, the ridiculous macho-ism, the strangely good cinematography and pretentious and silly lines. it all is just so enjoyable
wallace and gromit don't count because they're awesome. NOW TAKE BACK WHAT YOU SAID.LCanFlyy said:OT: Does Wallace and Gromit count?
Because I ordered the dvd'salong with Chicken Run.
OK, compare:necromanzer52 said:
with
The skin tone was made... just icky... (though they kept that shade of green throughout, but nothing was as bad as that puppet), but it's the mouth... as though they filled half the mass of his head with botox via his lips. I reckon they should've just gone straight to CG Yoda in Ep 1.
I never said they weren't awesome D: *hides*TheFederation said:wallace and gromit don't count because they're awesome. NOW TAKE BACK WHAT YOU SAID.LCanFlyy said:OT: Does Wallace and Gromit count?
Because I ordered the dvd's
I love Wallace and Gromit. I used to have a play set.
Some of the pokemon movies are still fun to watch (Yes even the new ones). Despite me being 17, their good to bring nostalgia in and see some of the nice animation that they can do, in the movie of course.
The Alvin and the Chipmunk live action movies. I really enjoyed them, although I probably shouldn't. But hey, if I'm enjoying something other people aren't, that's just more benefit to me. No harm in it.
Honestly? Out of respect for Natalie Portman as an actress I can't bear to watch the prequel trilogy. I mean here was one of the most talented young actresses working in the industry at that time, and they were making her say some of the worst most godawful lines I've ever heard in a movie.prince_xedar said:
The worst bit, I thought, was when she got her mid drift exposed by a perfectly precise cut from that alien jaguar thing in the second movie. That made it shift from awful dialogue and poor direction straight into the realm of exploitation.
I just watch Black Swan, or V for Vendetta, or Garden State, or Closer or even Leon: The Proffessional and I find it hard to believe that this is the same actress.
But still, that's just my view, feel free to enjoy whatever you like for whatever reason. I admit, the primary reason I saw Thor was because I wanted another opportunity to check out Ms Portman so I understand your point.
Anyway onto the topic at hand:
Seriously, there are actually quite a few movies that fit that catergory. I used to have a very big thing with cheap, uninspired horror movies. Especially silly monster movies with bad special effects. If only so that I could mock them, of course, but all the same it's something I'd never do in public.
But the ultimate cheesy monster movie, and one that I have watched over and over again is Piranha 3-D. I mean I know it's rubbish, but then so must have everyone involved. Considering how many arthouse movies my parents keep taking me to see, I feel I've earned the right to see a naked Kelly Brook get eaten by CGI Piranhas.
Sometimes it's the simple things in life that are the greatest.