LoopyDood said:I'm going to have to agree with her that it's damn annoying when somebody does something like that, but it just seems some people are constantly looking for excuses to complain about things.
These two posts pretty much sum it up. If you are going to do anything online, a certain level of thick skin is a prerequisite. Griefers happen. They are incredibly annoying and a whole lot of other much nastier words, but... sexual assault? I don't think so.Baby Tea said:Annoying? Frustrating? Juvenile? Idiotic? Perhaps breaking the TOS?
Absolutely, 100%.
Sexual Assault?
No.
I don't doubt the guy was annoying, and she shouldn't have to quit or log out due to harassment, and obviously Sony needs to do something in terms of moderation of avoidance of these things (I recommend an 'ignore' Feature that makes the offending player and the 'victim' invisible to each other), but to call this 'sexual harassment' is a step too far.
Sony could give the harasser a ban, but beyond that... I don't see what the problem is. Hell, look at all the people who get Teabagged in Halo. equally as annoying and juvenile, but no hype about that, now, is there?
Unacceptable behaviour like that is up to the company to deal with. A ban is in order for the guy, but taking it further is a bit over the top, if you ask me.
My advice to this woman is to contact Sony to report the behaviour and get the guy banned, and then grow some somewhat thicker skin so it doesn't get blown out of proportion. I have no doubt that she was deeply insulted, but as far as the law goes, I doubt this is really going to go very far.
Come to think of it, if it was labeled as 'harassment' then I would be more inclined to agree, but it's still something Sony needs to deal with and ban the douchebag. It falls under Home's TOS in either case, and in either case the guy deserves a lengthy/permanent ban; it would just seem a bit less blown out of proportion.Logan Westbrook said:It's inAs I understand it, it's the room mate who called it assault. I wonder how you all would have reacted had he said 'harassment' rather than 'assault'?Epitome said:I disagree with this. Your avatar is a digital extension of yourself to be sure but we cant start confering human emotions and capabilities on them, your avatar is no more capable of sexual assault in say Home than he is of murder in an FPS. Griefing has been around for aslong as multiplayer and so long as people can have anonymity and interaction your going to get assholes. So somebody followed her around and made a crouch gesture, to call it sexual assault to me cheapens the term and is an insult to women who have been sexually assaulted. Imagine this woman showed up at a support meeting and claimed there she had been sexually assaulted the people would be disgusted.
That's my opinion of it, anyway.