teh_v said:
From the master of the friends zone I'm here to say it is there it does exist and it sucks. Case and point I've been friend zoned before but the situation that caused me to NEVER let me be put in the friend zone is this.
-snip-
You got pwnd!
tl:dr = Nice guys finish last.
Anyway, I think your story is fairly typical (to varying degrees) of many "beta" males (that's not meant to be offensive, I'm just referring to guys who aren't terribly assertive, and are comfortable and content with letting others set the standard). It's an unfortunate reality that if you put other peoples' wants and desires above your own you're going to get taken advantage of. "Nice guys finish last".
Now girls, before you say "That's not true! I'd date a nice guy over a jerk any day!", we're using "nice" in different contexts. To use an example:
Let's say you're at a restaurant and you ask for no cucumber in your salad, but when your salad arrives it has cucumber in it. You call the waiter over, explain you asked for no cucumber and ask them for a replacement salad. Now, as long as you didn't abuse the waiter or anything, it's perfectly reasonable to expect to get what you ordered and there's nothing not-nice about asking for a replacement. A girl would have no trouble identifying you as a "nice" guy.
If, on the other hand, you said "I don't want to cause a fuss, and I can easily pick out the cucumber", you are putting the restaurant staff's happiness above your own
even though they were in error, and it would be unreasonable if they got upset with you for asking for what you ordered. This is the kind of "nice" the quote "nice guys finish last" is talking about - people that willingly bear the faults of others, either through some misguided sense of duty or, as in most cases, a fear of or reluctance to engage in conflict.
Like most things, it mostly comes down to what experiences people had when they were young. If most of their experiences include fair, reasonable people then they're not going to see people as inherently unreasonable and don't
expect there to be any conflict when they inform the waiter of their error. If, on the other hand, they frequently dealt with unreasonable, aggressive people in their childhood they tend to see people as being inherently unreasonable and aggressive, and so they DO expect asking for a replacement to be met with conflict, even though this is almost never the case.
I wonder if there's a correlation between child order and this personality difference. My older brother fits the former demographic, where I fit the latter. Could it be that my near constant interaction with an older, oppressive sibling was the primary cause of my irrational expectation of conflict? Probably not, but I'm curious anyway.