ZeroMachine said:
Holy strawman arguments, Batman!
Oooh, this should be fun.
Because the word "******" and the word "feminazi" are comparable and both have long histories of use in a bigoted manner, correct?
"Feminazi" was coined specifically to be an offensive and bigoted term.
Beyond that, you're trying to artificially distinguish, because length of time doesn't matter. It's not a strawman, it's you attempting to split hairs.
But good job at attempting to distract from the core of "anecdotes are not evidence." A shame I didn't fall for it.
And I can't even think of clever way to call your comparison to drunk driving out for being ridiculous because it's just that ridiculous.
It's "ridiculous" only because you can't counter it. It demonstrates flawlessly the lack fo value of personal anecdotes, and since that was the core of your argument, you have nothing. So instead, you're trying to flip it around on me.
Listen, I read what you said about where the word originated from, but the way it's used has changed. Yes, that's a legitimate argument.
No it's not, and I gave a very real world example. Hell, let's further that example: the primary users are Rush Limbaugh and Rush Limbaugh's followers. Obviously, the meaning hasn't changed.
And just because some dumbass politician uses it in the, yes, negative and bigoted manner in which it was originally used, does NOT mean that's the way the general public sees the word.
Ummm...He's not a politician. He's also the guy who coined the phrase. And one of the big users. Sorry, your argument just fell flat.
He was using it as a word to try and spin things against an opponent in a political debate. It was terrible, disgusting, chauvinistic, and he should be reprimanded.
Try and know what you're talking about next time. But thankfully, he's being reprimanded anyway. Oh wait, he's not. While there's some outrage, he won't be punished. And instead, people are echoing him and calling he a Feminazi. It's almost like your argument is invalid or something. But you might have known that if you did even cursory research.
But the VAST majority of people, including a ton of feminists, use the term to describe extremist women who believe that men in general and women who use makeup are lesser beings who want to control women and make sure they're never seen as equals in society.
Bull.
I understand if you're heard it in the negative connotation that it'd be difficult to get over that, but look around. MAYBE my experience is the happy minority, but I feel like you'll see it's usually used to describe people whose ramblings actually send gender equality back a few decades.
"Look around! Sure, I might be in the minority, and SURE, you can and have provided alternate examples, but dammit, that's inconvenient to my argument!"
The Unworthy Gentleman said:
It isn't a comparison, nobody is saying they're Nazis by calling them feminazis. What people are doing by calling them that is saying that they're fanatical. It isn't an ideological link, it's an attitude link.
Despite the above poster's complaints, it is very commonly used as a broadbrush way of attacking feminists in general. Sorry.
And while it may seem "obvious" to you, it "obviously" isn't "obvious" to a lot of people, since they're using the word you're saying people don't use "that way" in exactly "that way."