sideshow said:
as upset as i am i will say this. atleast she was beaten up in virtual reality rather real life.
To be honest, i'd like to see the first episode of this Tropes VS Women and THEN make my opinion. as for the current reaction.......i still think i'm asleep and this didn't really happen.
......or it did happen and the person who made that flash game has their electronics taken by Jim Sterling's hammer. and by taken i mean broken into tiny bits
I don't know why you should look forward to her video. Uwe Boll makes bad movies, why would you look forward to his next one?
Her analysis of Bayonetta consists of saying it is sexy therefore it is bad with no explanation WHY it is bad. Then she says it is to blame for women getting unwanted groping on Japanese subway trains... with absolutely no explanation how a fictional depiction of a woman who is never shown being sexually touched leads to sexual assault. The only link is male heterosexuality.
It's nonsense.
This adds nothing to the discussion. This totally fails as a discussion, this only works as an ignorant one-sided lecture where she never engages with any of the criticism. And she clearly reads everything, but cherry picks the trolls. Chose your own straw-man.
She doesn't like Bayonetta being sexual... but she can't just be frank that that is her personal preference, she has to make up nonsense about how this causes sexual assault without looking at the actual circumstances of those assaults, she just jumps to conclusions.
http://www.destructoid.com/interview-anita-sarkeesian-games-and-tropes-vs-women-230337.phtml
In a game that totally defies all laws of physics she complains about her wearing high heels and not wearing trousers. She doesn't actually give an objective reason why she can't just wear underpants, I don't see anyone objecting to how female Olympic athletes wear pretty much only swimsuit-bottoms. Why should a female have to conceal her legs? Is this Saudi Arabia?