Moonlight Butterfly said:
Also the fact that she sees half naked women everywhere doesn't make it 'right'.
Her argument here isn't that its right its that games are not the only place that this is seen which Anita tries to make people think it does from her video.
Men are made for male gamer power fantasies not for women to drool over. It's called false equivalence.
You do realize that woman still fawn over the males in games. You also realize that there are normally dressed woman in quite a few games and the scantily clad ones are usually the ones that are in fighting games.
Zelda and Princess Peach are pretty much the exact definition of a damsel in distress. Why the hell is Zelda even being captured in the first place if she can bring Ganondorf to his knees with one spell?
Why do the most powerful people fall to the weak ones? Mostly because they let their guard down.
I will give you the one about Princess Peach because I really don't agree with that one and find her to fit the damsel in distress perfectly.
But Zelda in the most recent games, I am talking about Ocarina, Windwaker and Skyward Sword, is not a damsel in distress. Link is trying to kill an overarching evil in each of them but saving Zelda plays mostly second fiddle until the very end of the game where saving her means saving the world. Zelda plays more of a role of embodiment of the world they are living in. In Ocarina of Time she dresses up as Shiek and goes against Gannondorf which is how pretty much the entire world of Hyrule feels. Only after she lets her guard down in that game does she get captured. In Windwaker shes a fucking Pirate. The world is covered by 90% of water at this point in time and she is the captain of a Pirate crew that traverses the world which is what quite a few of the people of that world wish to do. And Skyward Sword Zelda is realized as the messenger of the Goddess to which she must stop the Demise from reviving and destroying the world.
Links adventures don't follow the Damsel in distress formula.
All of her points are totally bogus.
To which I have to kindly disagree and say that they are not totally bogus. A few of them are but not all of them.