It certainly isn't good for those of use who don't care for the hyper-"masculine" *sarcastic air quotes around 'masculine'* testosterone fueled gun wanks.
I wouldn't bee too worried about it. In a few more years time, FPS games will probably fall out of popularity and something else will take their place. It's happened countless times before.RaikuFA said:i agree fully, i love playing my games but im scared of the games i like becoming less and less existant because companies realize playing it safe with military shooters and fighters is better. i mean capcoms already doing that. theyre being stubborn with the release of AAI2Tank207 said:Whatever the most popular game is at the time, there will be endless people trying to copy them. It's an easy way to make money, and the industry has been like that since the NES days. This isn't really a new thing.RaikuFA said:but all they do is make the same game over and over again. i like diffrent. i dont want my choices to only be "military shooter" "beta of a fighter that will be rereleased in months"Terminate421 said:Popular stuff is popular for a reason. These "Frat boys" allow the publishers to get funded, and they pay developers to make more games. I swear, too many assume lesser known games are godly next to the latest CoD game.
Some are just getting into our medium. Big Budget AAA titles allow them to step in further as interesting things will catch their attention.
Just stick to playing what you enjoy, and to hell with what other people think. What matters is that you enjoy the games.
OutrageousEmu said:- actually, considering Catherine is the best selling Atlus game ever,
A PlayStation 3 game must be on the market for 10 months and sell at least 500,000 copies to meet the Greatest Hits criteria.
I never said games were more diverse in the past, but I think most would agree that games are still pretty stagnant when it comes to diversity. The small changes aren't enough and the games that do include "diversity" tend to market it as if these "diverse" characters are little more than freak shows for the "normal" people to ogle at.OutrageousEmu said:Yes, it is true that games are more diverse than ever before, and characters have more depth than ever before. But thats supremely obvious - only someone who knowss literally nothing about gaming and has pusposefully ignored every game to have been made for the last 10 years could disagree with thatGenericPCUser said:I would agree to a change in the diversity of games, and a main character with more personality that his cardboard cut-out.
Perhaps.. but look at some of the patch notes from DS around halloween last year. Atlus considered it at that time its best selling game ever.OutrageousEmu said:How about the fact that Demon Souls isn't an Atlus game? Demon Souls was made by From Software. Atlus published the game in America. Sony published it elsewhere.
You're just as bad as the GameStop employee you're complaining about, so to be quite honest I find it hard to care about your problem. Your mentality is just as bad as his was, the only difference being which games you're bashing. If it annoys you so much, maybe you should start with the one person who you can most easily get to stop acting like that: yourself. After you stop, then you can preach and complain about others.RaikuFA said:Games I like that are considered "niche" are getting bad reviews based on the fact that theyre not endorsed by a redundant football announcer, theres no space marines, theres no kung fu hobo beating up russian bear wrestlers* or because it dosent look like its Michael Bays latest masturabatory aide**.
I never knew Persona 4 and Fallout: NV were shooters.OutrageousEmu said:Kanji Tatsumi, Persona 4. And I will remind you, the height of older gamings appraoch to difference in sexuality was when Final Fight had you go beat the crap out of transvestites.GenericPCUser said:I never said games were more diverse in the past, but I think most would agree that games are still pretty stagnant when it comes to diversity. The small changes aren't enough and the games that do include "diversity" tend to market it as if these "diverse" characters are little more than freak shows for the "normal" people to ogle at.OutrageousEmu said:Yes, it is true that games are more diverse than ever before, and characters have more depth than ever before. But thats supremely obvious - only someone who knowss literally nothing about gaming and has pusposefully ignored every game to have been made for the last 10 years could disagree with thatGenericPCUser said:I would agree to a change in the diversity of games, and a main character with more personality that his cardboard cut-out.
So far, Skyrim may have had the most respectable way of including homosexuality, but I digress.
RPG's are generally more open to something different than something like a First-Person shooter, and the only time I've seen a possibly gay character in a shooter that was done well was (I'm not kidding) Bulletstorm. (And maybe Heavy in TF2)
I fully expected it to be bland and muscle headed, but at least it was fun. However, there was one, miniscule, almost insignificant part that showed they at least tried. Ishi, the cyborg teammate of the main character, mentions that he may be attracted to the main character on some level. The main character, who I would have to assume was heterosexual, merely states that he is not there one judge.
It's never brought up again, but the mere fact that I remembered it and not all of the bland story and all the other bland characters must mean something.
Diversity is just supposed to be there, it's not supposed to be the direct focus of the story.
That's what separates Star Trek from The Help.
Oh, and - Veronica Santangelo and Arcade Gannon from Fallout New Vegas - the most sane, levelheaded and pleasent people you will come across in the entire damn game, easily two of the most dependeable and interesting companions each having numerous chances to kick ass, and a lesbian and a gay man, respectively.
Agreed. I think reviewers should only focus on gameplay, nothing else. The problem is, to a extent, the "HARDCORE" audience, you know, the guys who take a billion steroids before playing the next GRITTY REALISTIC shooter for only MEN! Instead of, you know, playing for fun, or playing to experience something different?RaikuFA said:its because niche games get automatic bad reviews or are considered crap by the consumer because theyre not popular. and that douchebag judged the game on its cover aloneOrdinaryundone said:So you are mad because a game store owner didn't know about some obscure as hell game, and because the stuff you like isn't popular? Did I get that right?
Also, what the crap is wrong with Street Fighter?
also, street fighter is mediocre to me, although ive been hating it because capcom rereleased SF4 twice already yet said when it was first released they wouldnt be pulling this crap