I hold critics in high regard for what they do. I look on Rotten Tomatoes all the time, and I'll hardly ever see a movie that falls below 50 percent, unless I'm on the fence about it. I find that one shouldn't look at the tomato-meter like a grade in high school, but rather the chance that one is going to like a movie. I look at Sucker Punch and say, there's a 20% chance I'm going to like this movie... yeah not really worth my time. People who say that critics are predictable or follow a strict set of rules of what constitutes a good movie are talking out of their ass. Comedies like Get Him to the Greek, Rango, or Paul are held in high regard by critics. Even Piranha received a positive score. I saw Red Riding Hood and it was awful, and I'm sorry, but I find Movie Bob becoming less and less reliable as a "professional" critic. It seems to me that any movie with women that are scantily clad or sexually appealing is going to receive a thumbs up from MovieBob. And I can hardly trust after calling The King's Speech nothing but Oscar fodder. Especially considering his "criteria" of what makes an oscar baited movie was full of shit. Seriously, one of his criteria for oscar bait was a involving a person "overcoming something". I'm pretty sure the job of any protagonist in any story ever is overcoming something in one way or another. His comparison of Brazil to Sucker Punch was enough to send me into a nerd rage, as Brazil is probably in my top 10 movies of all time.
I occasionally will see a movie that falls below the 50% mark, and most of the time I dislike it. The last one I saw was Battle: LA (mostly because I had a free pre-screening), and I can honestly say that I will not see a worse movie this year. Then again, you're talking to a person whose friends and himself holds the Oscars in a higher regard than the Super Bowl. So yes, fuck the critics for what they do. For only YOUR opinion is the one that matters. And then go fuck yourself, for you have become that which you hate the most, a critic.