You are wrong.Zeeky_Santos said:You're saying you're going to deny a person's argument because you can't be assed to even know what the fuck their argument is?Rednog said:Ok, first off, not to sound like a dick, but I'm not about to go jump into a 37 minute video or accept blindly that it will somehow/somewhere have some sort of counter to my whole argument. Seriously, I'm not a fan of someone taking a tiny snippet of someone's argument, saying they disagree with it and thus saying it's somehow negating the rest of the argument. It doesn't.TimeLord said:Being a furry is not about sex. I should know, I am one.Rednog said:So...umm yea, while yes there are clear differences if you sit down and try to think why people like furies (it's sexualizing animals with human physical characteristics)
People assume sexualisation because of the media portrayed around furries.
Deviant art doesn't do anything to help my argument either....
But seriously. Watch this;
http://vimeo.com/17995012
The guy near the end explains my entire argument.
Really sorry, but unless there is more to the arguing against my point I'm not about to go spend half an hour watching a video, that I'm pretty sure won't counter my argument about the definition you're trying to convince people to believe.
You do realise that voids any opinion you might have in any future argument on the subject right? You understand that you have made all your arguments invalid? Yes?
Read every article on this website to see why: http://www.wikipedia.org/
Failure to do this voids any opinion you might have in any future argument on the subject.
----
OT: Yeah I agree, it's stupid that people seem to mix the two up. You did make one mistake though. Anthropomorphic doesn't mean half human half animal. It's a humanised version of something that isn't human. Can be an animal, or a country, or a website, or pretty much anything.
Hell, I've seen an anthro-deathstar somewhere!