Fallout 3, Super Mario Bros.(GBC) and Gears of War 2. I only played Fallout 3 for a bit, and I can understand how people would like a sandbox game, but it was just boring going through gray rubble for hours and going to some sort of lame fetch quest. I got farther in Gears of War 2, and I liked the enemy diversity, but the game just wasn't fun at all. And I liked Gears of War, so I know it's not me.
And my god, Super Mario Bros., at least for the GBC, was completely awful. Every single time I was starting to have fun, I died 3 seconds later because the physics in the game are just so awful. I'll admit I'm not the best platformer ever, but I'd like to think I know my fair share considering I beat Mr. Skops on Rayman PS1.
Wintermute_ said:
Anything turn based or console RTS. God above do I hate turn based games.
Final Fantasy for example? The poster child of turn based stuff? Will NEVER see the draw. That and it just looks soooo fucking ridiculous. They style is just god-awful. Sorry to fans of the series, but when I see some really cool looking cinematic in a commercial with apparently epic combat, and its really just the same turn based "your guys line up over there, I'll stand over here with my guys, waiting to take it like a puss" gameplay, what's the point?
The only reason the older Final Fantasy games had it was to get around technical problems, just like random encounters. Oh, and it's called strategy. I can understand, thinking a battle through isn't what some people like, but unlike games like Halo, you cannot beat the game without knowing how to de/buff characters.