If it comes out this year, then Sonic the Hedgehog 4: Episode 2. Episode 1 was such a disappointment compared to 1, 2, 3&K, and CD. Other than that, I'm not to sure.
Have you played Crysis?this isnt my name said:Crysis 2, cod clone, with nano suits.
True, as it stripped you of your equipment. However, the whole idea of somewhat-mutated swamp rednecks being deadlier with overalls, shovels, and old break-action shotguns than power armor wearing, plasma weapon toting enclave soldiers was very bad. The whole reason for difficulty was bethesda wanted people to be afraid of a mysterious, lovecraftian enemy. Nothing lovecraftian about any of that, and the 'boss' of point lookout was anything but cthulhu-inspired.Zetion said:Ironically Point Lookout was one of the better DLC`s. Zeta was half-baked shit.Rhinzual26 said:Huge case of YMMV. Fallout 3 had a lot of issues with it, like that very long character creation process. Oh, not to mention Point Lookout being utterly full of fake difficulty.The Rascal King said:I'm shaking my head at you in utter disappointment. Remember the last time someone doubted Bethesda?PoisonUnagi said:Skyrim won't be all that good.
![]()
BOOM
Wow. Thanks for forcing me to remember those things. Might as well make me remember the Deathclaw random encounter in Fallout 1 or running into a small pack of Deathclaws on my way to Navarro when doing the infamous Navarro run. Sheesh.Zetion said:The reason that Zeta sucked wasnt the limitations, it was that they wasted their potential.Rhinzual26 said:True, as it stripped you of your equipment. However, the whole idea of somewhat-mutated swamp rednecks being deadlier with overalls, shovels, and old break-action shotguns than power armor wearing, plasma weapon toting enclave soldiers was very bad. The whole reason for difficulty was bethesda wanted people to be afraid of a mysterious, lovecraftian enemy. Nothing lovecraftian about any of that, and the 'boss' of point lookout was anything but cthulhu-inspired.Zetion said:Ironically Point Lookout was one of the better DLC`s. Zeta was half-baked shit.Rhinzual26 said:Huge case of YMMV. Fallout 3 had a lot of issues with it, like that very long character creation process. Oh, not to mention Point Lookout being utterly full of fake difficulty.The Rascal King said:I'm shaking my head at you in utter disappointment. Remember the last time someone doubted Bethesda?PoisonUnagi said:Skyrim won't be all that good.
![]()
BOOM
Maybe im just weird, but I remember fearing the aliens in F1 and F2. They would hand your ass to you, but now they cant take a shot to the face.
but that trippy walk through the swamp...totally awsome and totally worth itRhinzual26 said:True, as it stripped you of your equipment. However, the whole idea of somewhat-mutated swamp rednecks being deadlier with overalls, shovels, and old break-action shotguns than power armor wearing, plasma weapon toting enclave soldiers was very bad. The whole reason for difficulty was bethesda wanted people to be afraid of a mysterious, lovecraftian enemy. Nothing lovecraftian about any of that, and the 'boss' of point lookout was anything but cthulhu-inspired.Zetion said:Ironically Point Lookout was one of the better DLC`s. Zeta was half-baked shit.Rhinzual26 said:Huge case of YMMV. Fallout 3 had a lot of issues with it, like that very long character creation process. Oh, not to mention Point Lookout being utterly full of fake difficulty.The Rascal King said:I'm shaking my head at you in utter disappointment. Remember the last time someone doubted Bethesda?PoisonUnagi said:Skyrim won't be all that good.
![]()
BOOM
yeah but overall it was VERY well recieved, it basivally took everything good about oblivion and improved it while fixing some of oblivions faults AND it had a setting a milllion times more interesting that standard fantasy setting type A (I hated Oblivion but Loved Fallout)Rhinzual26 said:Huge case of YMMV. Fallout 3 had a lot of issues with it, like that very long character creation process. Oh, not to mention Point Lookout being utterly full of fake difficulty.The Rascal King said:I'm shaking my head at you in utter disappointment. Remember the last time someone doubted Bethesda?PoisonUnagi said:Skyrim won't be all that good.
![]()
BOOM
So I take it you doubt anyone can play Oblivion or Fallout 3 and enjoy them, even think of them as good? And become interested in the rest of the series because of them? Sadly, your opinions are not held by everyone or even the majority. You don't like it, does not make it bad.ChupathingyX said:What good is GOTY, Betehsda games are just like the Call of Duty franchise, they're successful just because of the name and developer. If a game says "The Elder Scrolls" or "Call of Duty" in front of it, people will buy it and it will be successful. Awards mean nothing, and neither do reviews, they're just opinions from a single person or a group of people.Nieroshai said:And yet they won GOTY hands down. Because people LOVED it. And from what I read, they fixed the concerns you mention. Except the good vs evil thing, but honestly it's their story.ChupathingyX said:Skyrim will most likely have all the same mistakes Oblivion and Fallout 3 had. Forcing you to fight for the good guys, actually having a "good vs evil" plot and more than likely crappy dialogue.
They're are many people, and I do mean many who hated Fallout 3 because of how much it fucked with the Fallout lore and characters. The writing was bad, the story was bland and stupid and there were so many black and white moral choices. Same goes for Oblivion which had one of the worst main quests I've ever played, the second half was basically doing the same thing over and over again.
Morrowind was better than Fallout 3 and Oblivion and if Skyrim is Morrowind with all the major problems Morrowind had fixed, then it will be good. But I doubt it considering that Bethesda get awards for bing worse than Morrowind they will continue to be worse than Morrowind.*sigh*
yeah, and the bodies in the water...I could understand Amata or elder lyons but I always wondered why was moira brown there? did the PC actually like her I supose?Zetion said:I was like "too far" when they showed the skeleton with the birthday hat that said "mom".Vault101 said:but that trippy walk through the swamp...totally awsome and totally worth itRhinzual26 said:True, as it stripped you of your equipment. However, the whole idea of somewhat-mutated swamp rednecks being deadlier with overalls, shovels, and old break-action shotguns than power armor wearing, plasma weapon toting enclave soldiers was very bad. The whole reason for difficulty was bethesda wanted people to be afraid of a mysterious, lovecraftian enemy. Nothing lovecraftian about any of that, and the 'boss' of point lookout was anything but cthulhu-inspired.Zetion said:Ironically Point Lookout was one of the better DLC`s. Zeta was half-baked shit.Rhinzual26 said:Huge case of YMMV. Fallout 3 had a lot of issues with it, like that very long character creation process. Oh, not to mention Point Lookout being utterly full of fake difficulty.The Rascal King said:I'm shaking my head at you in utter disappointment. Remember the last time someone doubted Bethesda?PoisonUnagi said:Skyrim won't be all that good.
![]()
BOOM
It was like "LOL lowblow"
lower thy flame shield good sir, there's a rumor that it'll star Ghost... what, that Gaz wannabee that had maybe 5 lines and then died? the multiplayer will probably be the same ol schtuff (if you like it, youll like it, if you dont, you wont) but the story will suck bawlz.baddude1337 said:Modern Warfare 3.
*Gets flame shield*