Canid117 said:
I noticed the newest "Games that have aged poorly" thread and decided to make a counter thread. What is a game that has aged astoundingly well?
Chess, obviously. The beta was first released in the 6th century, but it was all in Sanskrit so the developers had to make an English patch by the year 1000. The full version of the game was released around 15th century after the localization team adapted it to Western audiences.
For its time, it featured 4-D graphics, real time game play, interactive cutscenes, a unique wireless controller that offered amazing interactivity and physical feedback (no batteries required), peerless uninterrupted multiplayer free from server lag and without subscription fees, and highly polished gameplay and tutorials (although the Egyptains claimed that they all did it first and that the developers were just ripping off their game engine). It receives constant updates and patches to this very day, and recently has achieved cross platform availability, successful localization and poularity around the world, and smart enemy A.I. It has even become popular enough to be considered a sport by tourney fags (though casual players can still enjoy it too without it being ruined for them), though all the competitive servers nowadays are flooded by Russians the same way South Koreans flood the Star Craft II servers.
Some detractors might say that, as good as the game was back in the retro era, the absence of a plot, characterization, and strong narratives hamper the game compared to modern AAA games. To them I say pish-posh, Chess is a game purely about it's gameplay mechanics and doesn't need a story. It is a game in the purest sense, without the need to cross into movie or novel territory!
Anyway, yeah, Chess has aged amazingly.