Good point.rekabdarb said:I know someone who refuses to play WoW (he used to) because the graphics look terrible.CitySquirrel said:I think it is a personal taste thing. I have a friend who can stand anything from the playstation era because the early 3d graphics look bad to him... he uses the argument that they don't age well. However, they don't bother me at all, which leads me to believe that it is not about the game itself but about how we perceive the game.
I felt like slapping him.
Anyways, Define "age"
Because if you think it's gameplay, then i think no game has aged poorly... because that's how they came out. If it's graphics, yet again slapped in the face. Of course newer games will look better. But if it's the story, then... well back to the first thing.
It's just that a lot of games are ridiculously hard now, with all the checkpoints, infinite respawns, and such that we have now.
It's really just how you want to interpret it, though.
What's your definition of a game aging poorly?