Games that should have never existed.
- Thread starter Voulan
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Welcome.Garret866 said:
I'm relatively new here, as well. Thanks for posting in my thread first, I guess.Very true. In the case of my Mary-Kate and Ashley games example a few pages back, these games seem to serve more as fan-service gone wrong. They certainly learned their lesson with that after...3-4 games.Elidan1012 said:
But still, I don't believe that creating games for the sake of seeing if it works and appeals to the audience (and for science
) is a great incentive to make a game. I think it should always aim to actually be good for the sake of getting money's worth. Games should always aim to be good.
I thought Metroid Other M came before Metroid Fusion so it already has a sequelfunguy2121 said:
And I honestly can't thing of any game actually bad enough to not exist, maybe Knight in the Nightmare that was a bad game, maybe even FF13 but the gameplay was okay so i don't see a point in complaining.
Dino Crisis 3
It was supposed to be about Regina and dinosaurs in modern times. They put it in space, took out Regina, and removed all the dinosaurs. What the flying fuck was Capcom thinking?
It's basically the Alien 3 of video games.
It was supposed to be about Regina and dinosaurs in modern times. They put it in space, took out Regina, and removed all the dinosaurs. What the flying fuck was Capcom thinking?
It's basically the Alien 3 of video games.
I think it was the game's style that put me off; it seemed a bit too colourful and loopy compared to Red Alert 2. Maybe I was too harsh saying I thought they ruined the Allies, but their units and support powers just seemed worse than the other two factions. That, and I missed my prism tanksCollins254 said:
.
Hold on a second, I enjoyed it, it has good replay value and it's fun to make super weapons. If you prefer the older games, that's fine, but don't get bitchy about it.Collins254 said:
Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm off to play KUF:COD.
I agree with missing the prism tanks, and yes it wasnt as dark as red alert 2, but the gameplay was smooth, i loved the new mirage tanks, i liked how every unit had a support power aswel as its main function, to me added more strategy to the game, i did like the coolness of the japanese faction, but to me it was everything they had that felt weaker than the other 2.Failhammer said:I think it was the game's style that put me off; it seemed a bit too colourful and loopy compared to Red Alert 2. Maybe I was too harsh saying I thought they ruined the Allies, but their units and support powers just seemed worse than the other two factions. That, and I missed my prism tanksCollins254 said:
I could literally write pages on all the aspects of red alert 3 i like, on how each of the factions compare to each other, in each stage of technology, why i would pick each faction and strategies i would use to win, and probably a strategy for each game map, ye i overplayed that game, and on the Xbox aswel, i found the controls really easy to use, and went really well with the controller. I know alot of people would argue with RTS on the consoles but i found it easier to use on the xbox than my laptop, oddly enough, and if i must be honest the best rts/rpg ish game i ever played was on a console and it was kingdom under fire.
Also which support powers didnt you like? the time bomb was the strongest of all support powers, the added airforce power was awsome, freezing was extremely useful in combination with the surgical strike to kill buildings/a few tanks instantly.
And when it comes to units
Peacekeepers>Imperial soldiers>conscripts
Attack dogs=bears> scout drones
Rocket men>flak troopers vs aircrat<flak vs tanks and flakShinobi> Tesla troopers
Tanya>Natasha>Yuriko vs buildings
Natasha>Yuriko>Tanya Vs long range enemies
Tanya>Yuriko>Natasha Vs infantry swarms
Sorry il end it there, i could go on all day but you get my idea, im not saying your opinion is wrong im just showing how i formed my opinion of the factions =]
Well thats your opinion and fair enough, i wish they hadnt called it a KUF game though, yes it used the same characters but thats like picking up C&C5 Kanes vengence and finding out now your playing a FPS as kane, yes it could be a great game to someone but C&C fans generally would be expecting an RTS, as i was with Circle of Doom, i played 2 hours of it, realised i wasnt going to be able to play it like the old KUF games, and if i wanted a game like that id have bought dynasty warriors, same gameplay style but better games IMO.Choose a Username said:
Captcha: ruin allowed :/ is that a sign?
Castlevania: Lament of Innocence - Marked the end of the era that was the 'Vania' part of the 'Metroidvania' genre.
Metroid: Fusion - See above. They almost came back from this with Zero Mission, then the Metroid Prime games, but then the same guy ended up in charge of Metroid and gave us the all-around sucktastic "Other M."
Jak II - The first game was a fun, if uninspired platformer in the vein of the old Spyro games. Jak II and III are more like "Grand Theft Auto: Furry"
Final Fantasy Tactics: Advance - Oh dear gods, the pain. Take everything that made the original Final Fantasy Tactics great, throw it away, and replace it with a nice, wet, fragrant bowel movement: furries and the stupid law system.
Metroid: Fusion - See above. They almost came back from this with Zero Mission, then the Metroid Prime games, but then the same guy ended up in charge of Metroid and gave us the all-around sucktastic "Other M."
Jak II - The first game was a fun, if uninspired platformer in the vein of the old Spyro games. Jak II and III are more like "Grand Theft Auto: Furry"
Final Fantasy Tactics: Advance - Oh dear gods, the pain. Take everything that made the original Final Fantasy Tactics great, throw it away, and replace it with a nice, wet, fragrant bowel movement: furries and the stupid law system.
I'm going to have to go with Battlefield Play4Free.
I'm not hating on it because it's a F2P with all of the problems that come with those.
It just doesn't have the feel of a finished game to me, maps are glitchy at best, run animations seem....off, and the weapons are a bit on the misunderstood weapon side.
I'm not hating on it because it's a F2P with all of the problems that come with those.
It just doesn't have the feel of a finished game to me, maps are glitchy at best, run animations seem....off, and the weapons are a bit on the misunderstood weapon side.
Nitpickery. Just because a game boy advance game exists doesn't mean there won't (or shouldn't) be any more Metroid games.ninjapenguin1414 said:
Now I don't know about LoI...I mean, sure, it wasn't like the Castlevania games before it, but it was definitely a fun, solid action game. Of course, this is just my opinion.targren said:
And I agree with Tactics: Advance. That game was blasphemy.
And I believe that IF the CD-I Zelda games actually existed (I'm a Zelda fan and they DO NOT EXIST! I REFUSE TO BELIEVE THIS!
) then they should not exist and thus should be scratched from the annuls of history.
What is wrong with the single player of the BC games? I found them quite enjoyable, if anything, it only adds to the total amount of time I have spent having fun with those two gamesScythax said:
And if they hadn't A) Slapped the Castlevania name on it and B) Stopped making Metroidvanias altogether, I'd agree with you. On its own, it was a passable, even enjoyable, game. But what it set into motion for the series is unforgivable.SixWingedAsura said: