Games that would make awsome movies

Recommended Videos

Canadamus Prime

Robot in Disguise
Jun 17, 2009
14,334
0
0
IHaveNoCoolness said:
canadamus_prime said:
IHaveNoCoolness said:
What are the 2 movies based on games that you think are good? Honestly? I want to know, because I can honestly think of none.

Movies based on games are terrible. Always. Even the best ones can only hope to reach the level of mediocrity...
The first Mortal Kombat movie (the one with Christopher Lambert as Raiden) & the first Resident Evil movie. I thought the first Mortal Kombat movie was really very good, esp. considering they casted Christopher Lambert, my only complaint is that I would've liked his character to have had a larger role in the film.
And the first Resident Evil movie, I thought was pretty good, even by normal movie standards. Granted it I understand it wasn't an exact copy & paste of the games story, but if you were honestly expecting it to be then you were setting yourself up for disappointment; same for all video game based movies.
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/mortal_kombat/

Mortal Kombat
24%. I would say you are in the minority of people who say this is a quality film.

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/resident_evil/

Resident Evil
34%. Better than Mortal Kombat but still not very good.

Now before you say that's all biased and that zombie movies and stuff are for a certain crowd....

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/dawn_of_the_dead/

Dawn of the Dead REMAKE. A remake...
74%. Not too shabby.

Sorry, but I would die before I called Mortal Kombat a good movie. They might be fun, but they are trashy fun. They aren't good. Neither of those films hits 50% which you could say at least 1/2 of the people that reviewed thought it was okay, so they weren't even mediocre. They were bad.
And I'd like to remind YOU that 99.9% of all statistics are made up. I say anyone who said these films were bad were probably expecting an exact copy and paste of the game they were based on which just wasn't going to happen. And quite frankly I don't think I'd really want them to do an exact copy and paste of the game, we all know the game's story; let them tell a similar story using the same themes, plot devices, & characters. With that in mind I thought the above mentioned 2 films were very well done and anyone who says differently needs to seriously adjust their expectations. (note: I said adjust expectations, NOT lower their standards. I want that made perfectly clear!!)
 

Guestowel

New member
Oct 9, 2008
243
0
0
I do not think that any video game should be turned into a movie, but if I had to chose, I would go with Cooking Mama
 

Captain Pancake

New member
May 20, 2009
3,453
0
0
Sins of a solar empire. Seriously, the game has no story, so all the writer'd have to do is prepare a script using the universe and you'd be set.
 

almost cool

New member
Apr 1, 2009
8
0
0
Five Days a Stranger would be the most epic movie ever. but of course the script writer would be tarded or the dialog would be like zero wing and we would have Resident evil all over again.

And if you don't know what Five Days a Stranger is, follow my link to enlightenment.(Its made by Yahtzee)

http://www.fullyramblomatic.com/5days/
 

IHaveNoCoolness

New member
Apr 14, 2009
214
0
0
canadamus_prime said:
IHaveNoCoolness said:
canadamus_prime said:
IHaveNoCoolness said:
What are the 2 movies based on games that you think are good? Honestly? I want to know, because I can honestly think of none.

Movies based on games are terrible. Always. Even the best ones can only hope to reach the level of mediocrity...
The first Mortal Kombat movie (the one with Christopher Lambert as Raiden) & the first Resident Evil movie. I thought the first Mortal Kombat movie was really very good, esp. considering they casted Christopher Lambert, my only complaint is that I would've liked his character to have had a larger role in the film.
And the first Resident Evil movie, I thought was pretty good, even by normal movie standards. Granted it I understand it wasn't an exact copy & paste of the games story, but if you were honestly expecting it to be then you were setting yourself up for disappointment; same for all video game based movies.
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/mortal_kombat/

Mortal Kombat
24%. I would say you are in the minority of people who say this is a quality film.

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/resident_evil/

Resident Evil
34%. Better than Mortal Kombat but still not very good.

Now before you say that's all biased and that zombie movies and stuff are for a certain crowd....

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/dawn_of_the_dead/

Dawn of the Dead REMAKE. A remake...
74%. Not too shabby.

Sorry, but I would die before I called Mortal Kombat a good movie. They might be fun, but they are trashy fun. They aren't good. Neither of those films hits 50% which you could say at least 1/2 of the people that reviewed thought it was okay, so they weren't even mediocre. They were bad.
And I'd like to remind YOU that 99.9% of all statistics are made up. I say anyone who said these films were bad were probably expecting an exact copy and paste of the game they were based on which just wasn't going to happen. And quite frankly I don't think I'd really want them to do an exact copy and paste of the game, we all know the game's story; let them tell a similar story using the same themes, plot devices, & characters. With that in mind I thought the above mentioned 2 films were very well done and anyone who says differently needs to seriously adjust their expectations. (note: I said adjust expectations, NOT lower their standards. I want that made perfectly clear!!)
Well, you and I have very different opinions on the value of statistics and the value of film critique in determining good and bad cinematography. I'm pretty sure that many of the film critics that watched this were probably not exactly familiar with the Mortal Kombat storyline outside of maybe some preliminary research they did into the film prior to watching it. So I'm sure their expectations of the film weren't biased on expecting the plot and characters to be a certain way.

I wasn't just citing and qouting statistics out of the air, I was bringing in an external source to back up my arguments. If you're just going to dismiss facts and figures that back-up someones claims because they punch holes in your logic and statements, that's not a really good debate tactic nor does it further the dialogue and discussion... Let's actually discuss these statistics and what they mean for our arguments.

Okay these movies are not good movies, but what else can we discern from this information that could further the debate.

Resident Evil was 10% better on average for these critics than Mortal Kombat, that would be an interesting avenue to point to further your claim that these movies should just explore the themes in these movies and not just try and rehash the game. I would say the Mortal Kombat is probably closer to the story of the original game than Resident Evil was. I don't think there were any original characters in RE that were in the game. It wasn't a good movie, but it was better than MK, I think that's interesting and it backs up your ideas on how to make these movies better.

Personally, I don't think either of those movies are good. They might be fine summer blockbuster popcorn movies, but they aren't good. I would agree that RE is better than MK.

Mortal Kombat in my opinion is abhorrent and terrible whereas, RE I might be convinced that it's a serviceable film.
 

Canadamus Prime

Robot in Disguise
Jun 17, 2009
14,334
0
0
IHaveNoCoolness said:
Well in that case I suppose there's no point in mentioning that I don't think very highly of movie critics.
Ok sure these movies were hardly Academy Award winners (which isn't saying much since the Academy Awards are bullshit), or rather they were hardly on the same level as films like say... Lord of the Rings, or Avatar, or... I can't think of any other examples, but the fact is ok, they don't compare to these films, but did they entertain me? Yes, so I'll consider them good films. Well ok, simply entertaining me isn't always enough to save a film, for example that terrible Dragonball: Evolution film. I'll admit I was mildly amused while watching that film, but I still say it was terrible. Now I'm willing to forgive a lot more then the average fan, as my time on the Internet and on the Escapist in particular has tought me, but I could not forgive the butchery of the characters. However in Mortal Kombat the characters weren't really all that deeply developed as far as I knew; and as for story, well sure both films didn't have truly blockbuster stories, but neither did the games they were based on so what exactly were you expecting? I don't see how they were any worse then say The Terminator, Escape from New York/LA, or Die Hard.
 

Lizmichi

Detective Prince
Jul 2, 2009
4,809
0
0
I'm most likely the 50th person to say this but none. Games are basically playable movies and the only people that will see and get the movie are the ones who have played the game and already ether know how it's ends or will be pissed that it's nothing like the game. I have the same feelings about movie games. Most of the time they're crap because they're mostly nothing like the movie. I can't even think of a good movie game and as a rule of thumb I don't buy them.
Games I would like to be a GOOD movie would be Prototype though take I Am Legend, take out Will Smith and the dog add more people and an ass hole that's a living virus. Umm *thinks* also Portal just because I love portal but that's not possible with how the game is, Half Life, No More Heroes, Dragon Age, and for shit and giggles Stains Row.
 

IHaveNoCoolness

New member
Apr 14, 2009
214
0
0
canadamus_prime said:
IHaveNoCoolness said:
Well in that case I suppose there's no point in mentioning that I don't think very highly of movie critics.
Ok sure these movies were hardly Academy Award winners (which isn't saying much since the Academy Awards are bullshit), or rather they were hardly on the same level as films like say... Lord of the Rings, or Avatar, or... I can't think of any other examples, but the fact is ok, they don't compare to these films, but did they entertain me? Yes, so I'll consider them good films. Well ok, simply entertaining me isn't always enough to save a film, for example that terrible Dragonball: Evolution film. I'll admit I was mildly amused while watching that film, but I still say it was terrible. Now I'm willing to forgive a lot more then the average fan, as my time on the Internet and on the Escapist in particular has tought me, but I could not forgive the butchery of the characters. However in Mortal Kombat the characters weren't really all that deeply developed as far as I knew; and as for story, well sure both films didn't have truly blockbuster stories, but neither did the games they were based on so what exactly were you expecting? I don't see how they were any worse then say The Terminator, Escape from New York/LA, or Die Hard.
No, it's quite obvious you don't think highly of movie critics, but that's fine.

Before you write off the Academy Award and call them bullshit, I would like to snarkily point out that Return of The King won the Academy Award for best picture. I really don't think it's fair to call the Academy Awards bullshit when one of the movies you cited as being better than these movies (Resident Evil and Mortal Kombat) won the best picture award.

As far as your 3 (4) films at the end, The Terminator, Escape from New York/La and Die Hard, I can't believe you would compare The Terminator and Die Hard to the Escape movies. The Terminator and Die Hard are towering pinnacles of cinematography compared to the Escape from ... films.

Also, the Terminator and Die Hard are both 100 times better than Resident Evil and Mortal Kombat... As for the reason's why, lets look at the original Terminator and not the more recent and crummier sequels.

The Terminator, the original was is a pretty terrific and serviceable horror film, that actually has a pretty poignant commentary on the dangers of reliance on machines. The Terminator as played by Arnold as an unstopping, unrelenting killing machine that can't be bartered, bargained or reasoned with is pretty scary and amazing. That film was wildly successful and is considered a classic film and one that defined an entire genre for many years. Compare that to Mortal Kombat which is campy at best.

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/terminator/

The Terminator. 100%.

Die Hard. This movie basically wrote the book on how to make a successful big budget action film. All the cliches come from this movie and it is pure genius. The premise and set-up make for a believable thrill ride, where you can't help but cheer for the scrappy underdog. Couple that with an amazingly and believably creepy role from Alan Rickman opposite to Bruce Willis' likeability as John McClane and enough twists and turns that this movie just never stops firing on all cylinders. This is a great film in that it sets up it's hero with problems and demons and then thrusts him into and extraordinary situation, and is amazingly believable and a lot of fun.

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/die_hard/

Die Hard. 94%.

I'm sorry, but I can't possibly believe that Mortal Kombat and Resident Evil can even hold a candle to these to films.

Granted, at this point we've gone off topic. The whole point of the thread was to discuss which video game would make an awesome movie. I don't think there is any hope of making one, and you clearly disagree. I don't accept mediocritry from films before I call them good. You can enjoy a bad movie just like you can enjoy eatting bad food. There's nothing wrong with that. You can enjoy bad things, but you just have to recognize that they are bad, and there is vastly superior stuff out there that might not be to your personal tastes but is clearly much better.

Sure, they could make an goofy movie based on Left 4 Dead, and it could be fun to watch as a distraction from our hectic and stress filled lives, but I'm willing to bet money, that the movie would just be a bad movie with little to no substance. In no instance would I ever refer to any movie about a game as being awesome at this point. Maybe one day I'll be surprised and they will make one, but in the mean time, I'm going to stand by the assertation that they are all terrible, because they are. They might be worthwhile distractions, but they're not going to be worth pointing at as the pinnacles of cinematography.
 

blindthrall

New member
Oct 14, 2009
1,151
0
0
Not all video game movies suck. I liked Silent Hill, and Hitman wasn't bad. I would say System Shock 2, but the tension is just boring unless something is trying to kill you, not some meathead onscreen. Starcraft could be epic if done well. Deus Ex would also be great, if not for Dan Brown's shit already broaching those ideas. The best would be Planescape: Torment, it already has an insanely deep and moving plot. It would kind of be like a hardcore Neverending Story. It would be really expensive to make, but if done right, could be better fantasy than LotR. De Toro would have to direct.

A Halo movie would just be a shitty Aliens rip-off.
 

blindthrall

New member
Oct 14, 2009
1,151
0
0
renner-08 said:
the S.T.A.L.K.E.R. series might make an interesting movie...
Really funny you should mention that, because it is. The game is based off it. Good luck finding it though.
 

Plinglebob

Team Stupid-Face
Nov 11, 2008
1,815
0
0
I would say Bioshock. I could follow the game story and if you change the audio logs to video logs they could be a great film device.