Yeah, I know that Victory is just a branch of EA - but the fact that they put it together shows that they are confident enough to make more, and I don't know a single C&C fan who would shell out for another C&C4 so lets hope that EA takes note and *tries* to make a better C&C game.Geo88 said:Victory Studios is just another branch of EA designed specifically to take over Command & Conquer, so I'm not exactly giddy with anticipation. Still, I might pick up the first game it makes to see how it is, though. Like I said, I liked Command & Conquer 3 and Kane's Wrath a lot. But I'll need confirmation ahead of time that they're ditching that terrible, horrible, awful "building" system. No way I'm going to dump $50 on another C&C4.CroutonsOfDeath said:Out of curiosity, what's your thought on Victory studios? Rumor has it that they are going to *try* and make a new C&C and do it right. I too enjoyed C&C 3, it won't live up to Westwood's standards but I didn't expect it too. Honestly I expected EA to defecate all over it, but I feel that they did as good as not-Westwood could have done with the game. I even liked RA3 for all it's quirks though it probably should have served as a warning that EA was playing with the formula in the wrong ways.
Oh, also - American McGee's Grimm. I may be cheating since it was episodic and I did finish an episode or two, but I didn't finish the whole series. I liked the art, the weirdo humour, all that stuff - it's just that the gameplay was entertaining for 5 minutes at the most and ultimately I just ended up watching the cliff-notes versions on YouTube for later episodes.