Games you wish had never been made

Recommended Videos

Solo-Wing

Wanna have a bad time?
Dec 15, 2010
3,642
0
0
FirstToStrike said:


This. This sad, pathetic excuse for a fucking game.

Sonic Unleashed made up for it though.
Something is very wrong with you. Very, very wrong.

We could have done without Sonic 06 and all Sonic games after it. (Except maybe Sonic Rush.)

Also Ratchet and Clank Size matters.
 

Sixties Spidey

Elite Member
Jan 24, 2008
3,299
0
41
sergnb said:
So this thread is just a listing of various shovelware games and the most hated franchises by the "hardcore" community.

Nothing I don't see in every single forum with PC gamers in it.

I can understand the hate towards movie licensed games and various "this is just a tech demo for your new motion capturing controller" games, but WHY do you guys hate so much games like Call of Duty?

Is it really that horrible that there's a game that is so simply fun, everyone can enjoy it? Do we really want to go back to the era of "this guy plays videogame, he is a nerd, punch him in the face"? Don't you guys find ok that douchebags and kids are introduced to videogames, even if it is in a violent and competitive way, but with the possibility to expand their knowledge of the medium?

Seriously, stop with the hipster hivemind and circlejerks that are going on around the internet recently. Everyone hates douchebags, but don't hate on a game just because they play it. Call of Duty is fun, deal with it.
Has nothing to do with hating on kids or douchebags at all. Kids eventually mature, whereas douchebags aren't worth wasting the slightest bit of time on. Either way you slice it, there's a long term solution to this:

Just don't use your headset at all, or mute players.
 

Shoggoth2588

New member
Aug 31, 2009
10,250
0
0
Force Unleashed 2. The first one was far from prefect and completely unnecessary but at least it had closure and, seemed to have been self-contained. There was no need to make a sequel but then...there it was. I still haven't played FU2 except for a demo and would like to continue living in denial that this game was ever made.
 

PxDn Ninja

New member
Jan 30, 2008
839
0
0
This list will probably piss a lot of people off but:

Street Fighter 4 (Many much better fighter games out there, both 2D and 3D. Also MVC3 fits here too)

Smash Bros - Too much to list why.

Starcraft (and Warcraft) - Terrible RTS titles that are destroyed by the competition in my view, but people keep buying them so they will keep making them (which is exactly what I would do).
 

PxDn Ninja

New member
Jan 30, 2008
839
0
0
BlueSinbad said:
Cod...I hate it, plus, when you think about it, it's kind of for casual gamers, whenever I look at my friends' achievement list the only games I see are CoD and Fifa...They're not refined gamers who love the classics, they just love shooters and killing people.
Honestly, just think about it, I don't see CoD players playing anything else at all, no matter how good the game is, they're not REAL gamers.
:p
What does that make me? I have beat just about every COD, and played through Halo 1,2,3, and Reach (not a big fan of the game, but as huge as it is I wanted to see if they improved what I didn't like in each one). I also have nearly 100% Mass Effect 1 and 2, Fallout 3, Oblivion, and have over 120 games in my collection from nearly every genre?

Moral of the story: blanket assumptions are bad.
 

ZombieGenesis

New member
Apr 15, 2009
1,909
0
0
FirstToStrike said:


This. This sad, pathetic excuse for a fucking game.

Sonic Unleashed made up for it though.
This but Sonic Unleashed did NOT make up for it. In many, several in fact, ways it was considerably WORSE.

At least Sonic 2006 had an intruiging betrayl story arch between Shad' and the robot.
 

ZombieGenesis

New member
Apr 15, 2009
1,909
0
0
kingcom said:
Alfador_VII said:
SeriousIssues said:

Whatever spawned this.
You seriously think FF7 shouldn't have been made? really?
I second this, a horrible game that spawned an entire generation of horrible games.
I'm not going to flame or complain here. Just going to say...
/ Countered

Just in case the Gaming Gods decide to make a terrible mistake and delete that masterpiece from history. Along with it the inspiration for several of my fictional works and traditions.
 

Flaming Narwhal

New member
May 6, 2011
66
0
0
The Madden series for obvious pumping out an expansion pack every year.

And Halo 1 onward, because the series has stagnated since then. It also spawned Red vs. Blue, and if I hear one more joke about Kaboose, I'm gonna cut someone.
 

Rooster893

Mwee bwee bwee.
Feb 4, 2009
6,375
0
0
Solo-Wing said:
FirstToStrike said:


This. This sad, pathetic excuse for a fucking game.

Sonic Unleashed made up for it though.
Something is very wrong with you. Very, very wrong.

We could have done without Sonic 06 and all Sonic games after it. (Except maybe Sonic Rush.)

Also Ratchet and Clank Size matters.
But then there wouldn't be awesome games like Sonic Colors!

Trust me. It's not as shitty as previous titles.

Don't believe me? Play it yourself.
 

Rooster893

Mwee bwee bwee.
Feb 4, 2009
6,375
0
0
ZombieGenesis said:
FirstToStrike said:


This. This sad, pathetic excuse for a fucking game.

Sonic Unleashed made up for it though.
This but Sonic Unleashed did NOT make up for it. In many, several in fact, ways it was considerably WORSE.

At least Sonic 2006 had an intruiging betrayl story arch between Shad' and the robot.
How was it worse? Please, do tell.
 

Xanadu84

New member
Apr 9, 2008
2,946
0
0
Way too many games on this list that are very popular and enjoyable, that some people just hold a grudge against. And it's too bad, because a game you don't like not existing isn't going to help you in any way. No ones forcing you to play it. So in an attempt to be more reasonable, I am going to say Too Human. Why? Well, because from what I remember, Too Human was the game that prevented us from getting a sequel to Eternal Darkness. Who out there is going to say that they would prefer Too Human over a sequel to such a classic horror game?
 

ZombieGenesis

New member
Apr 15, 2009
1,909
0
0
ZombieGenesis said:
FirstToStrike said:


This. This sad, pathetic excuse for a fucking game.

Sonic Unleashed made up for it though.
This but Sonic Unleashed did NOT make up for it. In many, several in fact, ways it was considerably WORSE.

At least Sonic 2006 had an intruiging betrayl story arch between Shad' and the robot.
How was it worse? Please, do tell.[/quote]
Well since you asked nicely, alrighty.

Firstly I felt that Sonic 06' actually had something of a strength in its initial premise. It took a few steps back, looked at the series and said 'okay, what if we throw out what we know, and go as if a lot of this was new'? As a result we got an entirely new world, a new eggman design, and several new mechanics.
Admittedly they didn't pan out very well (GOD those Non-Stop Run zones drove me insane) but it was an attempt.

Sonic Unleashed certainly tried adding new things, but they are things that don't even seem good in concept. Sonic is now a Werewolf, okay, already we're starting off with a facepalm here. Adding to that the melee sections, which for anyone who's played them feels gratuitious, and the new mechanic goes out the window. Aside from that main element the other mechanic (find enough coins/rings to start a stage) is just arbitrary padding and not pleasant at all.

Also I have to admit. While 06' went on a very basic premise (Eggman attacked) and grew into something more involving, Unleashes just started off in a bad way. Eggman turns Sonic into a furry super monster for... no real reason... and then releases him again onto earth! Why? So he can release some super-demon that we already know is going to turn around and bite him in the ass anyway. And then that little pixie with the amnesia trope. Just... I couldn't get my head around the number of bad deicisions that came into it.

The way I see it, both are BAD games. However 06' was bad because of execution alone, there wasn't all that much wrong with the premise of what they wanted to do.
Unleashed though, was as bad on paper as it was in play. That is why I see it as worse.
 

Iwata

New member
Feb 25, 2010
3,333
0
0
Shoggoth2588 said:
Force Unleashed 2. The first one was far from prefect and completely unnecessary but at least it had closure and, seemed to have been self-contained. There was no need to make a sequel but then...there it was. I still haven't played FU2 except for a demo and would like to continue living in denial that this game was ever made.

Don't worry man, the demo IS the game.
 

Gregg Lonsdale

New member
Jan 14, 2011
184
0
0
Craorach said:
Golden Hawk said:
Words from the master. All games have their place, but when it's just for the money? Yuck...

Plus, I wish Star Wars: Republic Commando had never been made. Nice team tactics, good gameplay, nice cliffhanger-ish ending. THEN NO SEQUEL! Eternal sadness...
Look.. like Twilight, I don't like alot of these games. But enough people do and that's obvious.

There is nothing wrong with Twilight existing, not every movie needs to be a moving artitic masterpiece.

Likewise, not every game needs to be an incredibly work of art.

Games, movies, TV, books.. these are all entertainment.. they can also be moving, challanging, horrifying, and all the other things a work of art can be.. but they don't have to be.

Its okay for things to be just mindless fun.
I don't have anything wrong with just mindless fun either, not every game has to be a masterpiece containing narrative and emotionally adept characters. Hell, there's nothing wrong with bad games existing either, as long the devs at least tried to make something unique. The games that I'm talking about are the ones that are just corporate-designed gruel with nothing special about them at all, made to be bought but not enjoyed. Not just because they're bad games, but because it makes it harder for people to get actually good games made when all the producers are drooling over Activision's giant pile of money and just says "make that happen". They're clogging up the industry with homogeneous sludge, and I like to think that if they had never existed we'd be seeing much better games out in existence today.
Like maybe "Mirrors Edge-Good Edition". something I'd like to see.
 

BlueSinbad

New member
Oct 18, 2010
319
0
0
PxDn Ninja said:
BlueSinbad said:
Cod...I hate it, plus, when you think about it, it's kind of for casual gamers, whenever I look at my friends' achievement list the only games I see are CoD and Fifa...They're not refined gamers who love the classics, they just love shooters and killing people.
Honestly, just think about it, I don't see CoD players playing anything else at all, no matter how good the game is, they're not REAL gamers.
:p
What does that make me? I have beat just about every COD, and played through Halo 1,2,3, and Reach (not a big fan of the game, but as huge as it is I wanted to see if they improved what I didn't like in each one). I also have nearly 100% Mass Effect 1 and 2, Fallout 3, Oblivion, and have over 120 games in my collection from nearly every genre?

Moral of the story: blanket assumptions are bad.
I was saying about the ones who only play CoD mate :)
 

Cythros

New member
Mar 30, 2011
21
0
0
I'm going to jump on the "Treyarch" band-wagon for this discussion, because I truly believe that the only thing wrong with the CoD series is that Treyarch became involved and transformed the series into a giant cash-cow milking. Not to mention most of their games sucked, as CoD 3 and WaW were merely carbon copies of Infinity Ward's previous titles, with WaW being far less balanced/enjoyable than CoD4. Black Ops I guess is okay by comparison to Treyarch's previous titles, but by this point the CoD series has become so bland and overdone that Black Ops needed to do a lot more than add another zombie minigame and cut down MW2's online multiplayer to be anything other than just another boring cover-based shooter that the industry has been bogged down with in recent times.

EDIT: Argh, hit post too soon. Anyway, think about what the CoD series would've been like without Treyarch. We would've had CoD 1 and 2, then 3 would've been Modern Warfare 1, and 4 would've been Modern Warfare 2. The games would've been fewer and more spaced apart, meaning the series would've ended up far less tiring.
 

PxDn Ninja

New member
Jan 30, 2008
839
0
0
BlueSinbad said:
PxDn Ninja said:
BlueSinbad said:
Cod...I hate it, plus, when you think about it, it's kind of for casual gamers, whenever I look at my friends' achievement list the only games I see are CoD and Fifa...They're not refined gamers who love the classics, they just love shooters and killing people.
Honestly, just think about it, I don't see CoD players playing anything else at all, no matter how good the game is, they're not REAL gamers.
:p
What does that make me? I have beat just about every COD, and played through Halo 1,2,3, and Reach (not a big fan of the game, but as huge as it is I wanted to see if they improved what I didn't like in each one). I also have nearly 100% Mass Effect 1 and 2, Fallout 3, Oblivion, and have over 120 games in my collection from nearly every genre?

Moral of the story: blanket assumptions are bad.
I was saying about the ones who only play CoD mate :)
Ah touche. I misunderstood. :D
 

Free Thinker

New member
Apr 23, 2010
1,332
0
0
I think we could've nixed a few Dynasty Warriors game. A few were good. Dynasty Warriors 5: Empires was good and should be kept. But most need to go.