Muspelheim said:
rhizhim said:
but i hope they dont complain afterwards how society continues to "outcast" homosexuals.
Again. This is exactly why they want their own Olympics. They were outcasts from society from the beginning. Certainly, things are slowly changing, but after being dismissed from general society for so long, it's little wonder why they'd want to separate themselves.
What else, really? Should they be grateful because society doesn't openly hate them anymore? Better late than never?
you cant stop anyone and/or force anyone what to think and what not.
we still have people who'd like to call black people, niggers.
we still have people who'd like to call women, worthless spunkholes.
we still have people who'd like to call mexicans and people from south america, bean bags.
your point on the "'how society doesnt opely hate them' is bad" is a bit of melodrama. and yes, it is still better late than never.
just by keeping their mouth shut about the things they think is still a better solution than to openly deflame them in front of, lets say children in public. who then repeat what they see and hear...
they shouldnt be overly grateful(ok i get that, society fucked up a relatively long time ago.), but they also shouldnt absolutely ignore that society is moving towards them, trying to intergate them into the "norm" of society.
nor should the gay comuntity see the endevour to integrate them into the societies definition of "being normal", that serves as some kind of olive branch and to make wrongs of the past somewhat right (these choice of words are going to haunt me..)as "crawling back to apologise" and reason to use that to hold it against society for all "eternity".
like the stuff that went and still is happening in germany, where the latest generation is still getting beaten (figuratively) with the "you are a nazi" stick when they have absolutely nothing to do with the choices a grand grandparent did or didnt do.
what this event actually is causing is some kind of gender/sexuality apartheid.
and it is (to some extend) working against the plan to make everyone in our society feel like an equal member of society.
yes, straight people can participate too. but why actually call it gay olympics? doesnt the title itself separate the straight from the homosexuals? doesnt it already outcast the "straights"?
why not call it the olympics for equality or the amateur olympics or something else, where people can participate without giving a fuck about who you'd like to fuck?
or am i seeing something wrong? do certain sexual preferences turn you into an ubermensch.
i just cant see any reason for it other than its a spoof or hommage to the olympics and they want to have some games for fun. but again, please pick another name dammit.
you get the same backlash when you make an olympic event and call it "the straight olympics" or "the black olympics" or "the asian olympics" or "the olympics of the people who like golden retrievers and diet coke but not sprite or coke zero".
<color=blue>edit: the gay olympics were founded in 1968, a time where this event makes more sense since they actually were deflamed and shunned openly in public.
what pissed me off was that, we have come a very long way from what was in such a short time and we are still moving towards a society where everyone can feel as equals and i thought that these olympics were a fairly new event.
and if that were the case(being a new event), it would be somewhat contraproductive to this endevour to make everyone coequal to each other.
so i apologise, but my point somewhat still stands.
Lucane said:
Gaining entry into the "Gay Olympics" is more open than the "Olympics" (I don't really follow the "Olympics" but I guess possibly that they take issue with certain peoples life styles in regards to there bedroom habits.
no, they dont. the olypics doesnt give a fuck what you like in your bedroom.
all they care about is that you play fair and try to give your best and beat records.
sexuality doesnt make you inferior or superior.