Akalabeth said:
From the outside a lot of art-based industries seem like "fun" and that they should be art-driven. But we live in a money-based society. People need money to live.
Do you think that most small-time musicians, who work during the day in say an office and spend their nights jamming or doing gigs in small pubs, don't you think that if they love music they'd prefer to be making money doing it? Of course most of them probably would.
If current musicians enjoy what they're doing, shouldn't they be entitled to make money as well? If someone's enjoyment comes not from the music, but the performance, is their music any less valid? If people like it they'll listen to it.
If a particular song strikes a cord with you, listen to it, enjoy it and support the artist. If it doesn't, don't. The musical experience ultimately is a negotiation between the listener and the song. The artist's motivations aren't relevant in my mind.
Hey now, I think you might be putting words in the mouths of a lot of artists there. Because I can tell you right now, the overwhelming majority of them both known and unknown not only dismiss the downloading of their songs, but also actively encourage it. Heck, some even host the files themselves!
Now, obviously Gene Simmons is not among them, and I can respect that. He's a businessman after all, and KISS would not be the first band to sell out and take the money over the art (coughmetallicacough!). I don't think anybody should download music from an artist who explicitly states that they are against piracy, any more than I think you should, say, sneak into a movie without paying.
But his view is in NO way the majority, or even a sizable minority. Yes all those small time bands would love to be raking in the money like KISS, but most are intelligent and people-savvy enough to realize that piracy has helped the music industry far more than it has hurt it, and they will tell you this if you ask them. File sharing allows them to get their music out to more people, and the more people they get listening to their music the more people will buy it. You see, these bands acknowledge that a downloaded file is not a lost sale, quite the contrary; it is in fact a POTENTIAL sale, one more person who has been led to their art. One more person who may pay for their album, or buy their merchandise or attend a show. The music files themselves aren't the be all and end all of the business after all, and something like forty-nine out of every fifty artists will tell you that a thousand illegal downloads is just plain awesome, especially if they got even a single diehard fan out of it.
I'm not saying you don't have a point, because you do. For some people it IS totally about the money, and if their business model involves shutting out that aspect of exposure then the best of luck to them, and nobody should touch their work without paying. However, if you think that's the way most bands operate, and I say this with the utmost respect and factuality, you really should try going to the bars and clubs where the unsigned and less known artists get together to play and ask them yourself. Most will probably point you to their Myspace pages were you can listen to and download the music for free.