TheSentinel said:
You can't let me walk away from this thing, can you?
And if you'd apologised for the insult (especially given how intolerant this forum is to personal insults), rather than creating a subtle edit to remove it (after I'd already quoted it), I probably wouldn't have said another thing. I doubt we're gonna agree.
TheSentinel said:
Okay, fine. You are objectively wrong. People say that opinions can't be wrong. They can.
Opinion :
1 a : a view, judgment, or appraisal formed in the mind about a particular matter
2 a : belief stronger than impression and less strong than positive knowledge
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/opinion
I have not stated facts. I have clearly stated that objective assessments and personal judgements can often result in different answers - and have personally stated that my opinion CANNOT be true for all cases (i.e. objective).
An opinion can only be 'wrong', where the subject of that opinion is provable / measureable / whatever. For example - if I had the opinion that the sun went around the earth, the opinion would be wrong. Therefore, your statement is factually incorrect.
Where the subject of any discussion is subjective, there cannot be a 'right' and a 'wrong' answer. Because it is subjective, and referant only to the opinion holder.
TheSentinel said:
You're opinion fits the definition of opinion myopia. You cannot comprehend the fact that music you don't like is still music, because it goes against your opinion.
I have said that I personally do not consider death / scream / thrash metal to be music. That is a personal opinion. I don't see why anybody would consider it to be music, but I don't consider a caveman banging on a log to be music either. However, I'm absolutely aware that other people DO consider it to be their music. That's their opinion, and they're welcome to it, but that doesn't mean it has to hold true for me as well.
I'd also argue that your 'myopia' is significantly larger than you accuse mine of being. I don't call death metal music in my opinion, but I can accept that other people's opinion calls it music. You seem to be incapable of accepting that another opinion can have any validity... even from the perspective of the holder of that opinion!
How to define music has long been the subject of debate; philosophers, musicians, and, more recently, various social and natural scientists have argued about what constitutes music. The definition has varied through history, in different regions, and within societies. Definitions vary as music, like art, is a subjectively perceived phenomenon. Music may be defined according to various criteria including organization, pleasantness, intent, social construction, perceptual processes and engagement, universal aspects or family resemblances, and through contrast or negative definition.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definition_of_music
"The border between music and noise is always culturally defined?which implies that, even within a single society, this border does not always pass through the same place; in short, there is rarely a consensus.... By all accounts there is no single and intercultural universal concept defining what music might be" (Nattiez 1990, 47?8 and 55).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definition_of_music#Nattiez
It is absolutely clear that the definition of music is subjective. Therefore you can consider something to be music that I do not. Neither of us is wrong, because it is subjective and based on our own perceptions and preferences.
TheSentinel said:
Back at ya.