Giving the freedom to is still not preventing it. There is no middle ground. You either stop it from happening or you don't. It happens, therefore it isn't being stopped, therefore he either isn't willing or able to prevent it (or both!). Epicurus' argument is a valid one. :x Of course, it would be difficult to debate it with him seeing as Epicurus has been dead for a very, VERY long time.Raskolnikov34 said:He doesn't give permission to commit it; he gives the freedom to, but warns against it. The government does not make it physically impossible for you to rape someone, they say you should not, and have punishments as a result, but you still have the ability to choose whether or not you want to. That doesn't mean the government "gives permission to rape".
And following your reasoning, the government doesn't prevent rape either, but they're willing to. (Hence the punishment and the fact that you can be convicted of 'attempted rape'.)
So the Government is willing, but not able to prevent rape. So they aren't omnipotent...but it's an organization of humans. Noone expects them to be. :x