Just some background info on me: I'm 19, Male and English (London).
Dahni said:
First of all, your status as a gamer is not defined by what is between your legs so you are not a "girl gamer", you are a gamer just like everyone else who plays games is and always will be.
Agreed, anyone who defines themselves by the arbitrary background into which they were born, be it race, gender, socioeconomic group etc, and not by what they do is just foolish.
Dahni said:
Secondly, the lack of female-orientated options in games is not because developers are out to get you, they're out to get profits. Any idiot can look at the spectrum of gamers and find that the amount of girls is miniscule, particularly with games like Call of Duty and Halo. Pouring time and resources into designing female characters is a waste. Why re-design something that works perfectly well to account for a pair of breasts and attract a couple more sales? They want to put as much time and money into making the game enjoyable for the majority, not a small minority.
That said, there would be an opportunity for a 'girl games' market if only game designers knew exactly what that market is looking for. Is it just the exact same games we've got currently, but with the gender of the protagonist flipped? Or would the market prefer hackneyed stereotypical games about puppies and babies?
My point is that the 'girl gamer' community endlessly whines about not having any games 'for girls', but makes no positive action to elucidate what exactly games 'for girls' would be. It clearly isn't the case that the 'girl gamer' community wants a gender reversal for the protagonist because large numbers of games (mainly RPGs) allow for player creation of the protagonist. Of course it's not one size fits all and there's nothing that's going to perfect represent the desires of
all female gamers, but I'd imagine that games devs feel quite clueless as to what the market wants at all. The game devs know that if they clumsily slap some killing, heroism and maybe sci-fi themes into a game then common denominator guy will eat it up, but what can be said of the common denominator girl?
Dahni said:
You are a female invading what guys have always thought of as being their space, their time. A lot of guys I know keep their real lives seperate from their gaming lives. They have girlfriends and yes, they do find them a little irritating at times, so its relaxing to come onto a game and talk to other guys who may be in a similar situation. A girl invading that time can only make them resentful so obviously they're going to be a bit annoyed. They think of their games as a guy thing and the idea of a girl potentially beating them is not favourable. So yes, they will insult you. Yes, they may say some out of order things but a lot of guys are like that to each other all the time and if you can't handle having to put up with the male mentality, then gtfo games.
Okay, seriously, what ... the ... fuck?
I'm a guy, I've been one for almost twenty years, and I have never, in my entire life, met a guy who thought anything similar to the above in regards to gaming. Ever.
Gaming isn't our 'personal space' and it is neither our right nor would I expect it of a guy to verbally attack another gamer for any reason other than negative behaviour. It's just offensive and sexist (to men) to claim that we brutish men are just so simian that we can barely string out anything other than pejorative grunts whenever we find the fairer sex has invaded our big boy time. The insinuation that we don't have the strength of will to tell a girl to fix up if she starts acting in a way that might, hypothetically, drive us away from women as a collective and into the loving arms of other men amongst whom we can share our tales of our lives wrecked by annoying women is so mind bogglingly absurd that I don't know where to start. So here's a bit of clarification:
A) Girls are very, very unlikely to be treated badly. Most guys will treat women
significantly better than they will treat other men. I cannot stress that enough. They'll be nicer, they'll be less verbally or physically aggressive, they'll treat you like you're special and they won't contradict you when you're plainly talking shit. Especially if you're pretty. I really don't know who you've been playing with that verbal abuse from men has become so mundane a thing that you've created the above farcical rationalisation to justify it, but whoever it is certainly isn't representative of men as a whole.
B) The above point has its limits. If you act in an unacceptably childish or offensive manner you'll eventually annoy someone enough that they'll stop white-knighting and reciprocate (a lot of girls seem to do this, I don't know, maybe they think they're being edgy and 'one of the guys', but in reality it's just incredibly annoying).
C) You do not understand how most men think. I have never, ever known a guy who spends significant portions of his time having 'guy time' in which he gasses about his girlfriend and the tribulations of women behind her back to other men. 90% of most men's conversations will be jokes if they're with friends. I've only ever known other guys to speak at length about a private issue (especially concerning their girlfriend) if it has a obvious goal i.e. asking for advice. Of course, more intelligent guys will often discuss logic such as science or philosophy when in a serious mood. These differences are the largest I have personally observed between men and women. It seems to me that a lot of inter-female conversation is extraneous or serves no purpose (not being sexist here, I'm not making an objective qualitative judgement, just a subjective) and I don't know a single guy who talks at length about his feelings in the way you've insinuated. Not because we're big macho men and we're above feelings, not because (as quack psychologist like Dr 'Fuckus witus' Phil might say) we've got difficulties communicating emotion but because it
isn't interesting.
D) This insulting 'male ego' feminazi nonsense in which we poor men with our barely post-amoeba impulse control can't bear to have women beat us at anything is not only false but incredibly offensive.
E) Finally, despite all my generalisations thus far, one overriding point is that your whole OP stems off a massive generalisation about men. It'd be just as facile for me to state "All girls like ponies and babies and none of them like videogames".
BrightCranberryMoon said:
I do find it irritating, as Ephemeral-Addictions above, when girls who game and game well are considered to be "fat dykes" or girls with no life or no friends. And while gaming is still unfortuately considered a "mans world" I know that there is room for all of us to equally enjoy gaming and just get along.
This is an illusion I just had to address: since when has it been the case that guys who're really good at gaming are considered anything other than fat nerds by girls and guys alike? Since when has it been the case that men have venerated the guy with 5 level 80 WoW characters and a brigadier rank on Halo 3? We don't. We don't think that's 'cool' or something to be proud of, most people (regardless of gender) would just think "Oh god, what a nerd".
This is the actual male equivalent of the 'fat dyke', not the heroic champion of men that you and most other female gamers seem to portray.