Girl gets poo tattooed on her back
- Thread starter MetaKnight19
- Start date
Recommended Videos
#1 She cheated on him, and he knew she did.
#2 Even though she was aware he knew she cheated on him she asked him for a tat, and then signed a waiver..... that's her own idiocy.
#3 *applauds creative way to troll stupid whore*
#2 Even though she was aware he knew she cheated on him she asked him for a tat, and then signed a waiver..... that's her own idiocy.
#3 *applauds creative way to troll stupid whore*
Please put the link about the story being fake in the OP. Don't let this become the new "Boy masturbated himself to death"-thread that was shown to be fake early on, yet after like 600 posts people was still amazed that it had totally happened. x.x
Would've been awesome it if was true, however.
Would've been awesome it if was true, however.
I hope she doesn't get a penny. She's suing for $60,000 for tattoo removal after she signed a waiver saying that the design was "at the artists discretion". She thought she could take advantage of him, and he turned the tables and left her something to remember him by. Most people who cheat just move on and forget you, so I see that as the best possible punishment.
She can now never forget what she did to him or why he did that to her.
now lets just hope the judge doesn't buy her story that he got her drunk to sign the papers.
She can now never forget what she did to him or why he did that to her.
now lets just hope the judge doesn't buy her story that he got her drunk to sign the papers.
you guys know she'll have to go through months of incredibly painful laser therapy right?
this was in no way in the right, she shouldn't have fucked his friend fine, but for this to be TATTOOED into her? as in the ink is under the second dermal layer causing permanent pigmentation that cant be removed without having the ink evaporated via laser? (which also has an incredibly high chance of scarring from both the actual laser and the boiling pigment vapors going through her skin)
fuck that and anyone who says she deserves it, you're using up all the dildo points
this was in no way in the right, she shouldn't have fucked his friend fine, but for this to be TATTOOED into her? as in the ink is under the second dermal layer causing permanent pigmentation that cant be removed without having the ink evaporated via laser? (which also has an incredibly high chance of scarring from both the actual laser and the boiling pigment vapors going through her skin)
fuck that and anyone who says she deserves it, you're using up all the dildo points
Haha, saw this on Reddit the other day. The guy can't get sued anyways since she signed that form, right?
Damn, you just had to discover the obvious truth, didn´t ya? Y U NO let us have some fun?Deathleaper said:http://www.thesmokinggun.com/buster/poop-tattoo-story-is-crap-8764319
According to these guys, story if fake. Still looking around for other sources.
EDITAMN YOU, NINJAS!
/joking.
That's what you get for wanting a tattoo while you're drunk... and the tattoo artist is the guy you've been cheating on... and you gave him all the artistic freedom in the world by written consent... and you passed out during the process due to being too damn drunk.
So no, i don't really feel for her even though that is pretty damn harsh as paybacks go.
So no, i don't really feel for her even though that is pretty damn harsh as paybacks go.
He had her sign a consent form that any tattoo he did would be fine. Guys a freaking genius.The_Blue_Rider said:
[HEADING=1]Story is fake guys, fake.[/HEADING]
Just thought I would make that a little more obvious. I admit I was a little dissapointed too because it certainly seemed like it could have sparked up some interesting conversation and debate but of course, it won't because it is as previously mentioned fake.
That said if it weren't fake, I would have to say that I couldn't stand behind supporting such an extreme payback method. Something that would cost thousands of dollars to have removed and would be incredibly painful to do so. Granted if she had cheated on her boyfriend (had it not, you know been fake) then that was an undeniably bad thing to do on her part. But then again we never get to hear her (fake) side of the (fake) story, maybe she had a really good (fake) reason to cheat on her (fake) boyfriend. Maybe he was being cruel or mean or neglectful to her and so she sought comfort from his more accomodating (and more Fake) friend.
Hell maybe she got drunk or was in an emotional place that made her do something that was a momentary mistake, maybe she never told her (fake) boyfriend about it because she was ashamed of it.
All I'm saying is, I am on the mindset that it can always be possible to salvage a relationship that's undergone damage. Hell, I know a few married people who at one point their partner slipped and cheated on them but they were still able to forgive and forget and seek counselling and save their marriage. It can be done.
That's not so say that sometimes a cheating person isn't just being a bastard/***** who is inconsiderate and selfish and cruel to a person who loves them, it can happen that way too. But to automatically assume that a person who cheated on their partners fits that category is being a little bit harsh.
Especially if you aren't even going to at least consider their side of the story.
Now while this particular story was Incredibly Fake I was still a little appalled that people automatically assumed that the girl was guilty and the worst kind of scum on Earth without even considering the possibility that maybe the boyfriend might have been a contributing factor that lead her to doing it, or that maybe she was going through a series of emotional issues that lead to that path.
What I mean is, no one even considered her side of the story and instead assumed that the guy who (fake, fake, fake) tattoed a giant turd onto her back that would take thousands of dollars and hours of pain to remove must have been completely blameless.
EDIT:
[HEADING=1]STORY IS FAKE! IT HAS BEEN CONFIRMED AS FAKE ON THE FIRST PAGE![/HEADING]
Just thought I would make that a little more obvious. I admit I was a little dissapointed too because it certainly seemed like it could have sparked up some interesting conversation and debate but of course, it won't because it is as previously mentioned fake.
That said if it weren't fake, I would have to say that I couldn't stand behind supporting such an extreme payback method. Something that would cost thousands of dollars to have removed and would be incredibly painful to do so. Granted if she had cheated on her boyfriend (had it not, you know been fake) then that was an undeniably bad thing to do on her part. But then again we never get to hear her (fake) side of the (fake) story, maybe she had a really good (fake) reason to cheat on her (fake) boyfriend. Maybe he was being cruel or mean or neglectful to her and so she sought comfort from his more accomodating (and more Fake) friend.
Hell maybe she got drunk or was in an emotional place that made her do something that was a momentary mistake, maybe she never told her (fake) boyfriend about it because she was ashamed of it.
All I'm saying is, I am on the mindset that it can always be possible to salvage a relationship that's undergone damage. Hell, I know a few married people who at one point their partner slipped and cheated on them but they were still able to forgive and forget and seek counselling and save their marriage. It can be done.
That's not so say that sometimes a cheating person isn't just being a bastard/***** who is inconsiderate and selfish and cruel to a person who loves them, it can happen that way too. But to automatically assume that a person who cheated on their partners fits that category is being a little bit harsh.
Especially if you aren't even going to at least consider their side of the story.
Now while this particular story was Incredibly Fake I was still a little appalled that people automatically assumed that the girl was guilty and the worst kind of scum on Earth without even considering the possibility that maybe the boyfriend might have been a contributing factor that lead her to doing it, or that maybe she was going through a series of emotional issues that lead to that path.
What I mean is, no one even considered her side of the story and instead assumed that the guy who (fake, fake, fake) tattoed a giant turd onto her back that would take thousands of dollars and hours of pain to remove must have been completely blameless.
EDIT:
[HEADING=1]STORY IS FAKE! IT HAS BEEN CONFIRMED AS FAKE ON THE FIRST PAGE![/HEADING]
I'm more concerned about the article refering to it as the 'Narnia trilogy.' Yes, the Trilogy of Seven Books. I wasn't aware that people outside the Hitchikers Guide fandom made that mistake.
As to the actual story, this is rather a harsh retribution. Now she either has to keep the tattoo of poo on her back, or she has to have almost her entire back lasered at great cost, pain, and permanent disfigurement.
The boyfriend is an asshole. Normal people have reactions to other cheating which are mature and at least rational. He is just a dick.
As to the actual story, this is rather a harsh retribution. Now she either has to keep the tattoo of poo on her back, or she has to have almost her entire back lasered at great cost, pain, and permanent disfigurement.
The boyfriend is an asshole. Normal people have reactions to other cheating which are mature and at least rational. He is just a dick.
