GoldenEye Will Blow You Up For Camping

Recommended Videos

Little Duck

Diving Space Muffin
Oct 22, 2009
860
0
0
Blackadder51 said:
This i like a LOT.

Curse me having a Ps3 and not enough money to buy the Wii.
You know you could probably just play it 5 minutes less every day and the money you save on the electric bill will probably pave the way for a wii.

This intrigues me muchly. New game for the wii I want to buy? Very interesting.
 

ImprovizoR

New member
Dec 6, 2009
1,952
0
0
3 seconds? That's just stupid. Camp meter in Counter Strike was better. If you stick around in one zone, ZONE, not SPOT for too long your health reduces until you finally drop dead. That's the best anti-camp solution besides server administrators in PC games.
 

FightThePower

The Voice of Treason
Dec 17, 2008
1,716
0
0
Strikes me as a bit heavy-handed solution. If people are stupid enough to keep coming to you, why move?

Sitting in one spot just waiting for someone to walk by is obnoxious though.
 

Blackadder51

Escapecraft Operator
Jun 25, 2009
1,674
0
0
Little Duck said:
Blackadder51 said:
This i like a LOT.

Curse me having a Ps3 and not enough money to buy the Wii.
You know you could probably just play it 5 minutes less every day and the money you save on the electric bill will probably pave the way for a wii.

This intrigues me muchly. New game for the wii I want to buy? Very interesting.
Or you know, it could be a throw away statement. I will never buy a Wii.

Also that theory is stupid and i dont pay my electricity bill anway
 

DeadProxy

New member
Sep 15, 2010
359
0
0
Oh my fucking god, how many of you are missing the POINT of this mode. It's designed to make any match near constant running, or just give you a split second decision amount of time, thats the style that you WILL have to adopt if you ever use the mode.

And do people not realize that most likely you can fucking move while you aim? you do it all the time in every other shooter game ever.

And really, have any of you people actually counted out 3 full seconds? in a shooting game, 3 full seconds is enough time to scan a room and move on, or see someone and aim at them as you walk/run towards them emptiying your clip into their direction.
 

V8 Ninja

New member
May 15, 2010
1,903
0
0
I can see the advantages and disadvantages of this, but I honestly think that the advantages weigh out the disadvantages.
 

redboyjazz

New member
Jun 8, 2010
67
0
0
Can't help but remember on the 64 version of Goldeneye, Multiplayer as long as you stayed in a certain bathroom, you were immortal
 

WolfLordAndy

New member
Sep 19, 2008
776
0
0
Depending on the game, its perfectly normal. I mean, what if you've got to defend an objective? I get called camper all the time in games like BC2... even though I'm defending a flag, it's not my fault if they can't use their great numbers to either destroy the building or storm the place.

I feel this is just horribly lazy on devs part. Camping should be countered with intelligent map design. Making no where have only one way in, or if it does, have it on the whole pretty exposed.

Original Goldeneye was pretty good for this, the few campable spots that there were could be counted with explosives (as long as you had some type of explosive active)
 

Deadlock Radium

New member
Mar 29, 2009
2,276
0
0
Distorted Stu said:
Please be like Nightfire.. please be like Nightfire!
Agreed.
Though I find standing still for 3 seconds then exploding a little harsh.
It shoudld've been 7-8 seconds.
 

Wicky_42

New member
Sep 15, 2008
2,468
0
0
Vanguard_Ex said:
If you stand still for only 3 seconds?! That's a horrible idea!
What if you simply stop moving because someone has come into the room to talk to you for 5 seconds? What if you're trying to take a highly difficult sniper shot? Standing still for 3 seconds is most certainly not necessarily for camping. Fantastic idea, terrible execution. I think this will get nerfed or removed quite soon.
Or, you know, you could just not play with that mode turned on? Like "Big Heads" and "Slappers Only" - the damn thing is an optional game mode XD
 

mad825

New member
Mar 28, 2010
3,379
0
0
dastardly said:
1)
3) Camping may be "realistic," but it's not fun. Games should be fun. Multiplayer games in which sides can just camp and stare at each other aren't fun... but everyone wants the OTHER side to the the one that isn't camping. It's like rushing in RTS games--yeah, it works, but man it makes the game zero-fun.
Multiplayer games are not intended to be "fun" but rather competitive,more difficult and longer lasting.

if you cannot get any "fun", thrill or rush when there is difficulty then defeating/beating the difficulty, why are you going on-line?

EDIT:
this is a perfect example why Golden eye on the Wii is for no-one but causal gamers as they cannot handle any challenges
 

DTWolfwood

Better than Vash!
Oct 20, 2009
3,716
0
0
as if you can't camp while strafing left and right a bit over and over again <.<

All it does is throw out any semblance of tactics. O wells for pugs its alright. Definitely not something u want to enable of you actually want to have a good game.

For all the bitches who hate campers, learn to kill them, or better yet stop walking into the same light of sight as the camper. Not like he isn't ALWAYS in the same spot. 8P
 

Eren Murtaugh

New member
Jul 31, 2010
264
0
0
Aura Guardian said:
Eren Murtaugh said:
Aura Guardian said:
Assassin Xaero said:
Wow, after reading the comments it seems like half these people have never even played Goldeneye or realize it is on Wii only. In the tons of hours I spent on Goldeneye, I never once even remember seeing anyone snipe...
I approve of this. Also, I read the comments as well. They probably never played it either. Or realized its a Wii Exclusive
Again, I agree with this. Played the original, and there were only like, 2 instances I can remember sniping, and that was in the single player story. But still, 3 seconds is a bit of punishment, isn't it? I remember the watch laser, and it took a bit of precision. If they really want to make the game better, they should remove the Golden Gun. Yeah, it only had one shot, but if someone got a lucky hit, that was it for you. I can remember tons of times my friends would whore Golden Gun and get that lucky shot and win. It'll be the Halo Beam Sword and Gears Chainsaw all over again.
I wouldn't say get rid of it...but make a mode out of it. Man with the Golden Gun Mode for example. Then just deathmatch,team etc
Yeah, I can see how that would work. Everyone gets a Golden Gun. That would be kinda cool.
 

Xanadu84

New member
Apr 9, 2008
2,946
0
0
It's just a mode, and I'm all for experimentation in game design. But I'm willing to bet that this will be a dismal failure. One one hand, it will just encourage everyone to run around in stupid circles mindlessly, like 2 newb TF2 teams composed entirely of Pyros (Shudder). Then, you will have a few people who shuffle back and forth 2 inches, completely undermining the effect they are going for. I'm sure that playtesters who want to see this mode work loved it. But once it's played by millions, searching for every minor advantage they can pull out of the system, the purpose of this mode will disintegrate.
 

JWAN

New member
Dec 27, 2008
2,725
0
0
3 seconds? how about 5 so at least I can fart without having to worry about a quick distraction blowing my character up.