Stalk3rchief said:
awsome117 said:
Furioso said:
I liked halo 1 and 2, I didn't see how it was as great as everyone was saying it was but it was still my favorite game/games. Then Halo 3 came out and I thought it was cool. And then.... CoD 4 came out and showed me what a real fps can do, halo requires no skill, only the luck to spawn next to the biggest and most shiny weapons, and even then there is ALWAYS the prick who has been playing it since the day who came out and will kill you with an smg. But on to ODST, this game has potential, it can combine the tactics of CoD 4 with.... whatever it is that makes halo good, i can't figure it out, so we will have to wait and see.
Now, because you derailed the thread with a rant, I shall ponder a question:
In what way does CoD 4 take skill? You don't even have to play the game to level up...
Maybe by the fact that bullets actually kill people?
That you can actual use every tactic Halo doesn't, and Halo's only tactic is "Rush good guns, jump alot, throw over 9000 grenades, cross fingers."
CoD4 has a skill factor to it.
Shields ruin Halo.
Or maybe its the fact that grown ups play CoD4, whereas it's always little boys playing Halo3. Hell, my little brother plays Halo 3 and he's fucking retarded.
Well, depends on what you mean by "kill people". See, when you fire your gun, unless you have the magical(perk name escapes me) better bullet damage I will call it, it won't do much. Also, only one gun is really used, the M16. It can basically do everything.
Your second point describes Cod 4 perfectly, besides the good guns, as everyone already has it. Right in the beggining, you throw random grenades, and how for the best. and the "jump a lot" is replaced by "crotch a lot"
Where is the skill factor? It's basically Halo 3, but worse.
and regenerating health ruins Cod 4. At least it makes sense that sheilds are in. Also, regenerating health isn't very "realistic" in my eyes...
Dude, more kids play Cod 4 than halo 3.