I think probably the only sequel to come out in recent times that actually lived up to its hype was Mass Effect 2.Nickisimo said:(see: Sexual Intercourse)FoAmY99 said:90 percent of things don't live up to the hype, some fail harder than others.
On Topic: Yeah, it's typical. Sequels rarely live up to expectations and in the video game world it seems like big-name franchises are doing everything possible to fuck things up. Bioshock 2 was a bad idea from the start and the end product proved it. Modern Warfare 2's story-line was a misguided mess of cheezy action scenes and slow-mo death sequences(...and the multiplayer is campy shit, but that's another story). Dragon Age: Awakening was a disgrace(big, big DA:O fan and...sigh).
To play the other side a bit...sequels are so tough, especially when the stakes are big. You have a big fanbase that loves your product and wants the new installment. Not too new, mind you, gotta keep the core gameplay the same. But add things. Nothing drastic, but enough to justify the sequel. And tie in things from the old game. Fans love that. Not too much though or it gets corny. And so on...
If I ever make it as a published author I'm not doing sequels. Triple stamped it, no erasies.
basically this. if you had reasonable gripes with the game, maybe i could agree, but not at all, the game was perfectly fine, it completely upgraded all aspects of halo, which in a series, thats what a sequel (or prequel in this case) should be, right? so i really dont get how you are supposedly disappointed with reach. if you dont like reach, thats fine, but just saying, 9/10 games never live up to the hype, so really we should be used to that by now, and bungie did a solid job with reach so i really dont see anything to complain about, they made everything extremely user friendly and its so easy to hop on and play with friends in any aspect of the game, quite possibly the best done in the the past decade for fps'sPeteron said:You realize this game had the longest campaign out of any Halo? Honestly, complain about THEM, not this one if you want short campaigns. Just pay attention, there is a reason for everything. Plus, many bought this game for the multiplayer, seeing as the new Forge World is impressive. If you ask me this game seems much more epic game and story-wise than other Halos. So, no, actually, I completely disagree with literally everything you just typed.
No way you're getting a fair fight in Modded Warfare 2. Scavenging Dangerously Close Commandos seem to be all the rage(quits) these days.gmaverick019 said:SnapPeteron said:Snip
The voting system feels much more free than a "toss this game and grab another random one" in the CODMOD series and Halo 3. It's up to you whether you want to play Halo 1 and/or 2, but I recommend both.Space Spoons said:Reach didn't live up to the hype, but if you completely bought into the hype machine, you would have been expecting it to be the gaming experience of a lifetime, and possibly the last game you would ever need to buy. Pre-release hype almost always sets the bar impossibly high.
That said, I thought the game was excellent. I'm not a Halo veteran or anything, having only played Halo 3 prior to Reach, so maybe I'm missing out on something, but Reach seemed to be an improvement in every conceivable way. The story felt infinitely more personal to me when I began to get acquainted with the rest of Noble Team, and then ending caught me completely by surprise (I didn't know Reach was going to fall to the Covenant. Again, not a veteran here). The multiplayer has also seen a lot of improvement. It's now much easier to search specifically for what you want, and the antiquated Veto system has been replaced by a voting system.
Overall, an excellent game. It certainly didn't let me down.
Perhaps she meant the best ending in a Halo game? Or, god forbid, she likes one game's ending over another?heavymedicombo said:have you played shadow of the collosus? I bet you havent as you seem to be a halo fanboy.VanityGirl said:The ending was the best ending ever.
haha off topic on that quoting, but i can agree. people can say "blah blah blah in its in the game, its war, its online multiplayer what do you expect" but i say bullshit on that. why the hell do you think in tourny's and mlg pro rules they disqualify and not allow bullshit like that, its because its broken and the developers are too busy/dont care/etc... to fix it.Siuki said:No way you're getting a fair fight in Modded Warfare 2. Scavenging Dangerously Close Commandos seem to be all the rage(quits) these days.gmaverick019 said:SnapPeteron said:Snip
I forgot, was there a Beta for Mod(controllers) War 2? The game was solid on paper, but fell apart with a horrible community. Also, the fact that you could customize your combat performance to maximum efficiency while newbies who just got the game had to go with the starting weapons seems a little to cheap.gmaverick019 said:haha off topic on that quoting, but i can agree. people can say "blah blah blah in its in the game, its war, its online multiplayer what do you expect" but i say bullshit on that. why the hell do you think in tourny's and mlg pro rules they disqualify and not allow bullshit like that, its because its broken and the developers are too busy/dont care/etc... to fix it.Siuki said:No way you're getting a fair fight in Modded Warfare 2. Scavenging Dangerously Close Commandos seem to be all the rage(quits) these days.gmaverick019 said:SnapPeteron said:Snip