Have you noticed that in some of the best films of all time, women play small roles or are tomboys?

Recommended Videos

dicai

New member
Jun 4, 2009
139
0
0
Chicago sure had focus on women, I think...

And in Forrest Gump Jenny played a big role - she was Forrest's inspiration throughout the movie.
 

Treefingers

New member
Aug 1, 2008
1,071
0
0
I take it you've never watched anything by Hitchcock? He was well known for his frequent use of sexy blonde ladies, and he's often cited as one of the greatest directors of all time.
 

benbenthegamerman

New member
May 10, 2009
1,302
0
0
Coughcough Kill Bill, Silence of the Lambs, Fargo, Terminator, Funny Girl, The Birds, Carrie, Alien, Aliens Coughcough
 

me and my dog

New member
Aug 26, 2010
206
0
0
AjimboB said:
me and my dog said:
AjimboB said:
me and my dog said:
Also some the best war movies like saving private Ryan and the hurt locker won best picture and neither of those even featured women. Don't say that men play a bigger part in wars than women because we have ton of women defending our country along with men.
Women were only recently allowed to join the military, and they still aren't allowed to be front line infantry. Hate to say it, but men really do play a much bigger role in war than women.
Uh dude. When did I ever say that the girl from precious was a tomboy? Learn to read next time. Also women are more delicate than men. For starters they have a smaller part in war than men.
I need to learn to read? You're the one who replied to the wrong post, I didn't say anything about the movie precious.
sorry the damn ignore thing messes up my message board.
 

Treefingers

New member
Aug 1, 2008
1,071
0
0
me and my dog said:
Pulp fiction- This is the only film I can come up with on the spot that had a great leading female role that was not tomboyish and the film wasn't romantic. Even then, she was still not seen as much as the other people in the movie.

Good fellas- the girl wasn't seen very much and like I said before, she seemed kind of tomboyish. That might just be me though.
No. Uma Thurman got just as much screen time as Ving Rhames, Bruce Willis and Tim Roth, and even more than Christopher Walken, Tarantino, Harvey Keitel and Eric Stoltz.

And there was nothing tomboyish about the woman in Goodfellas. At all.



Ok so, off the top of my head some excellent films with strong female roles include:

The Descent - Pretty much all female cast. Did really well on the horror scene.

Antichrist - Only one man and woman which make up the whole cast, in equally important roles.

The Wizard of Oz - Critically acclaimed classical musical. Dorothy is thoroughly feminine, but it's not a romance film either. Notably, the main villain is also a woman.

Fargo - Brilliant film, Frances McDormand won the Oscar for Best Actress in a Leading Role.

Burn After Reading - Coens and Frances McDormand again being amazing.

Million Dollar Baby.

V for Vendetta.

Sin City.

The Matrix.

The entire film noir genre, known for it's use of the Femme Fatale. Double Indemnity being a perfect example.

Any Alfred Hitchcock film.

Mullholland Drive.

King Kong.

Chungking Express.

2046.

Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon.

Memoirs of a Geisha.

Speed.

Inception.

Fight Club.

Harry Potter series.

Scream.

American Beauty.

Kill Bill.

Taxi Driver.

Shaun of the Dead.

Precious.

Inglourious Basterds.

Amelie.

Spirited Away.

Princess Mononoke.

Requiem for a Dream.

Blood Diamond.

Little Miss Sunshine.

Pan's Labyrinth.

Let the Right One In.




I'll admit that Hollywood does have a bit of a bias against females, but you're just not looking hard enough. Also, the way you disregard feminine roles as 'romantic' but then disregard anything else for being 'tomboyish' is retarded.
 

Treefingers

New member
Aug 1, 2008
1,071
0
0
me and my dog said:
FaceFaceFace said:
So, you listed "great" movies with few to no important females, then list some films that do have important females, then deny some people's examples against you because they aren't "great" films... sounds more like there are just a decent number of good films with little significant female presence, rather than all of them. Even if it is the majority, that's hardly amazing; women have historically been treated as inferior and receive the same treatment as underrepresented minorities (even though they aren't one) today, in all forms of media and even, to some degree, in real life.

Also specifically, Shawshank Redemption took place in a men's prison. There were scenes outside said prison, which depicted few to no characters who were not in the prison earlier. They shouldn't have been expected to feature women unless you want them to shoehorn some interaction with a woman into the plot for no reason but to have a female character. You might as well argue that the movie under represents humans who are neither prisoners nor prison workers. It's true, but no one would expect a film about a prison to feature a lot of non-prison related people.
Uh I did not pick these films because they had small female roles. I picked them because they are great films(ex:Oscar winners). They just happened to have small female roles.
You picked Oscar winners with small female roles. There are Oscar winners with excellent and dominant female roles (Fargo, for example).

Besides, Oscars only count for so much, and then you're neglecting cinema from the rest of the world which is just plain ignorant. Not to mention all the indie stuff.
 

Heatray

New member
Sep 1, 2010
63
0
0
What's the problem with women being "tomboyish," as the OP so eloquently put it. And also, why is a woman considered "tomboyish" just because she has a get-shit-done attitude? The vibe I'm getting from me and my dog is that if a woman doesn't act like some bimbo from Sex and the City, she's "tomboyish" and therefor cinematically irrelevant. There's a reason 100% of men and 90% of women don't like Sex and the City or the women portayed therein, and it's the same reason most people wouldn't like a movie about one of the douches from Jeresy Shore.
 

octafish

New member
Apr 23, 2010
5,137
0
0
Treefingers said:
snip* Let the Right One In.
snip*
Excuse me, I haven't seen the film but have read the book, which female character are you talking about? Oskar's mother? Or did they omit the "reveal" about Eli in the film?
 

Gyrefalcon

New member
Jun 9, 2009
800
0
0
Uh no I have not seen precious because I am of male gender![/quote]

So when I saw many of the movies you named I was in violation of being of the female gender? That doesn't make any sense.

You are arguing that there are no "great" movies with female leads or strong support characters. Then you eliminate any movies that have women as aggressors.

What sort of movies did you think there would be left? Doesn't a good movie transcend gender? As a man don't you like looking at women on the big screen? Precious is about the human condition much as "Pursuit of Happyness" was.

benbenthegamerman said:
Coughcough Kill Bill, Silence of the Lambs, Fargo, Terminator, Funny Girl, The Birds, Carrie, Alien, Aliens Coughcough
Good collection there, benbenthegamerman!

Oh, how about "Million Dollar Baby" then Me and My Dog?
 

Treefingers

New member
Aug 1, 2008
1,071
0
0
octafish said:
Treefingers said:
snip* Let the Right One In.
snip*
Excuse me, I haven't seen the film but have read the book, which female character are you talking about? Oskar's mother? Or did they omit the "reveal" about Eli in the film?
Haha good call.

Well i was refering to Eli. The film alludes to her actually being a boy - a couple of times she states 'I'm not a girl', though that is initially thought to be referring to her being a vampire, until later on there is a very brief shot of his/her scars where his genitalia used to be.

The film keeps her gender pretty ambiguous though, more than anything. I hear that for the American remake they are omitting it entirely. However, i suspect the American version is going to be rubbish.
 

suhlEap

New member
Apr 14, 2009
1,044
0
0
ecoho said:
suhlEap said:
me and my dog said:
Also some the best war movies like saving private Ryan and the hurt locker won best picture and neither of those even featured women. Don't say that men play a bigger part in wars than women because we have ton of women defending our country along with men.
fair enough in the hurt locker, but there wouldn't have been any women in saving private ryan, because there was no women in the army during world war 2. plus that film tries to make america look amazing during the war whoch is bullshit. howevee that i a story for another time.
Ok i gotta ask what did we (the US) do wrong in world war 2?

OT: ok women are NOT alowed to be placed in combat its a rule in the US is it a stupid one? yes i know at least 5 women who would make great solders. Do i understand why? Yes women would be a distraction on the battlefeild if they were mixed with the male solders as most guys tend to think with their groan.
ok i'll take back the bit about america being shocking. i'd been drinking when i posted that, hence the terrible spelling mistakes as well. my grandad did tell me that the americans were responsible for more allied deaths in one of the battles he was part of, due to them shelling british trenches, but oh well.

as for women, i think they should be allowed to fight. they're not a distraction in a battle, because people are more preoccupied with trying not to get killed. i'm not into the whole feminism thing, but i don't see why women shouldn't be allowed.
 

Ironic Pirate

New member
May 21, 2009
5,544
0
0
me and my dog said:
Ironic Pirate said:
me and my dog said:
Furburt said:
JourneyThroughHell said:
Umm, the movies you name basically have male protagonists and that reasoning is enough for you to include them in the list, because the protagonists overshadow the supporting characters.

You use the word "overshadowed" a lot, but that really doesn't mean the movies are sexist nor does it imply any kind of coincidence.
Pretty much this.

I'm sure, given time, that the participants of this thread could easily name an equal amount of films with females as protagonist and all men being either absent, inconsequential or feminine.

Also, explain to me how the main character of Misery was tomboyish? She used a gun? Can't think of much else.
Her accent. The fact that she had a deep voice. She was not exactly a princess.
I think you're being more damaging to women than any perceived lack of female characters.
Do even know what a tomboy is? Go on Wikipedia,type tomboy. A girl who engages in activities that are often physical in nature. In Annie Wilkes case, working with guns,working on a farm,MURDERING.
Do you even know what I'm talking about? It's your attitude, that women can't do work, or that it is somehow wrong to do so, that is more damaging to the cause of female equality than any one movie not featuring a female character.

You seek to entrap women in narrow gender stereotypes, calling them mannish if the seek to actually do anything. And I'm sorry, but that is far worse than simple misogyny. I'm done with arguing with you, there is no further point.
 

Diddy_Mao

New member
Jan 14, 2009
1,189
0
0
It's been said already but the majority of the movies you mention are Male dominated for a reason.

Women rarely played a large roll in The Mafia and you can't expect to see them in a film set in a Men's prison or in the front lines of any War Pre-Desert Storm.

However there's actually a fairly rich history of strong female leads in what most people would consider classics of American cinema.

Marie Antoinette, Gone With The Wind, Joan of Arc, The King and I, Bonnie and Clyde, The Color Purple, Thelma and Louise, Sense and Sensibility, Little Women, virtually any film adaptation of Romeo and Juliette.
Etc etc etc...

And the argument of gender rolls in films is another ball of wax entirely. All I will say on the subject at this time is that you frequently need to look at their motivations and not just their actions.

After all Beatrix Kiddo's actions weren't set into motion because she was hurt, but rather because someone hurt her child.
 

Axolotl

New member
Feb 17, 2008
2,401
0
0
Diddy_Mao said:
After all Beatrix Kiddo's actions weren't set into motion because she was hurt, but rather because someone hurt her child.
You could say the same thing about John Matrix.
 

Dcill

New member
Sep 9, 2009
39
0
0
me and my dog said:
Dcill said:
Another point, don't ever use wikipedia as a source to anything. Automatic argument fail.
Uh I will when you give me an actual reason not to.Explanation fail.
Take any college level course and you would then learn. If you use wiki to site anything your research will automatically discarded. Wiki can be updated by anyone and is unreliable. There I explained why you never use wiki.
 

luckshot

New member
Jul 18, 2008
426
0
0
some other movies that seem to get over looked, partly because they don't have a specific genre, are the ones where a character typically female plays a major role but is only seen a few minutes if at all.
movies like: the four brothers and the sons of Katie elder. which when you watch both are pretty similar

an actual genre that could be argued is westerns, women typically play supporting roles but depending how you look at them that could change: Open range, where Kevin Costner's character is forced to decide to keep running from his past or get over it and stay
 

Snotnarok

New member
Nov 17, 2008
6,310
0
0
The best movie ever, Aliens Ripley is kicking ass and taking numbers, even Vasquze is doing the same.
 

PurpleSky

New member
Apr 20, 2010
2,055
0
0
Women are boring in movies because they end up the love interest, in Inception the girls actually matters, both Maud and the young architect.
 

Ensiferum

New member
Apr 24, 2010
587
0
0
What about Pan's Labrynth? That movie has a great female lead. And what about The Princess Bride?