sorry the damn ignore thing messes up my message board.AjimboB said:I need to learn to read? You're the one who replied to the wrong post, I didn't say anything about the movie precious.me and my dog said:Uh dude. When did I ever say that the girl from precious was a tomboy? Learn to read next time. Also women are more delicate than men. For starters they have a smaller part in war than men.AjimboB said:Women were only recently allowed to join the military, and they still aren't allowed to be front line infantry. Hate to say it, but men really do play a much bigger role in war than women.me and my dog said:Also some the best war movies like saving private Ryan and the hurt locker won best picture and neither of those even featured women. Don't say that men play a bigger part in wars than women because we have ton of women defending our country along with men.
No. Uma Thurman got just as much screen time as Ving Rhames, Bruce Willis and Tim Roth, and even more than Christopher Walken, Tarantino, Harvey Keitel and Eric Stoltz.me and my dog said:Pulp fiction- This is the only film I can come up with on the spot that had a great leading female role that was not tomboyish and the film wasn't romantic. Even then, she was still not seen as much as the other people in the movie.
Good fellas- the girl wasn't seen very much and like I said before, she seemed kind of tomboyish. That might just be me though.
You picked Oscar winners with small female roles. There are Oscar winners with excellent and dominant female roles (Fargo, for example).me and my dog said:Uh I did not pick these films because they had small female roles. I picked them because they are great films(ex:Oscar winners). They just happened to have small female roles.FaceFaceFace said:So, you listed "great" movies with few to no important females, then list some films that do have important females, then deny some people's examples against you because they aren't "great" films... sounds more like there are just a decent number of good films with little significant female presence, rather than all of them. Even if it is the majority, that's hardly amazing; women have historically been treated as inferior and receive the same treatment as underrepresented minorities (even though they aren't one) today, in all forms of media and even, to some degree, in real life.
Also specifically, Shawshank Redemption took place in a men's prison. There were scenes outside said prison, which depicted few to no characters who were not in the prison earlier. They shouldn't have been expected to feature women unless you want them to shoehorn some interaction with a woman into the plot for no reason but to have a female character. You might as well argue that the movie under represents humans who are neither prisoners nor prison workers. It's true, but no one would expect a film about a prison to feature a lot of non-prison related people.
Excuse me, I haven't seen the film but have read the book, which female character are you talking about? Oskar's mother? Or did they omit the "reveal" about Eli in the film?Treefingers said:snip* Let the Right One In.
snip*
Good collection there, benbenthegamerman!benbenthegamerman said:Coughcough Kill Bill, Silence of the Lambs, Fargo, Terminator, Funny Girl, The Birds, Carrie, Alien, Aliens Coughcough
Haha good call.octafish said:Excuse me, I haven't seen the film but have read the book, which female character are you talking about? Oskar's mother? Or did they omit the "reveal" about Eli in the film?Treefingers said:snip* Let the Right One In.
snip*
ok i'll take back the bit about america being shocking. i'd been drinking when i posted that, hence the terrible spelling mistakes as well. my grandad did tell me that the americans were responsible for more allied deaths in one of the battles he was part of, due to them shelling british trenches, but oh well.ecoho said:Ok i gotta ask what did we (the US) do wrong in world war 2?suhlEap said:fair enough in the hurt locker, but there wouldn't have been any women in saving private ryan, because there was no women in the army during world war 2. plus that film tries to make america look amazing during the war whoch is bullshit. howevee that i a story for another time.me and my dog said:Also some the best war movies like saving private Ryan and the hurt locker won best picture and neither of those even featured women. Don't say that men play a bigger part in wars than women because we have ton of women defending our country along with men.
OT: ok women are NOT alowed to be placed in combat its a rule in the US is it a stupid one? yes i know at least 5 women who would make great solders. Do i understand why? Yes women would be a distraction on the battlefeild if they were mixed with the male solders as most guys tend to think with their groan.
Do you even know what I'm talking about? It's your attitude, that women can't do work, or that it is somehow wrong to do so, that is more damaging to the cause of female equality than any one movie not featuring a female character.me and my dog said:Do even know what a tomboy is? Go on Wikipedia,type tomboy. A girl who engages in activities that are often physical in nature. In Annie Wilkes case, working with guns,working on a farm,MURDERING.Ironic Pirate said:I think you're being more damaging to women than any perceived lack of female characters.me and my dog said:Her accent. The fact that she had a deep voice. She was not exactly a princess.Furburt said:Pretty much this.JourneyThroughHell said:Umm, the movies you name basically have male protagonists and that reasoning is enough for you to include them in the list, because the protagonists overshadow the supporting characters.
You use the word "overshadowed" a lot, but that really doesn't mean the movies are sexist nor does it imply any kind of coincidence.
I'm sure, given time, that the participants of this thread could easily name an equal amount of films with females as protagonist and all men being either absent, inconsequential or feminine.
Also, explain to me how the main character of Misery was tomboyish? She used a gun? Can't think of much else.
You could say the same thing about John Matrix.Diddy_Mao said:After all Beatrix Kiddo's actions weren't set into motion because she was hurt, but rather because someone hurt her child.
Take any college level course and you would then learn. If you use wiki to site anything your research will automatically discarded. Wiki can be updated by anyone and is unreliable. There I explained why you never use wiki.me and my dog said:Uh I will when you give me an actual reason not to.Explanation fail.Dcill said:Another point, don't ever use wikipedia as a source to anything. Automatic argument fail.