How many sexual partners is too many?

Recommended Videos

TheDuckbunny

New member
Jul 9, 2009
489
0
0
lilmisspotatoes said:
shadowstriker86 said:
lilmisspotatoes said:
shadowstriker86 said:
For guys, there is none.

For a girl, 3. That's when the tread starts to wear.
Double standard much? Why is it that when a guy sleeps with a ton of people he's a hero, but a girl doing it is a slut?

I hope you're joking, but that's not funny.

Really, the number doesn't matter to me so long as a. there was proper protection involved, b. my partner's not sleeping with anyone other than me when we're together.
you know why he's a hero? because a guy has to work to get a chick. not the same for a chick.

even if a guy is an 11/10, he still has to work and put effort into getting a chick. If a girl is even a 4/10, she just has to wait a little bit later but doesn't have to work at all. Thus the reason for the double standard.
I will call BS on this reasoning, and leave it at that. The standard should be the same for women and men, because girls have to work just as hard as guys do to get laid.
This was called for.
http://img.moronail.net/img/8/7/2387.jpg

All in good fun though, I don't agree in the least.
 

Feller1948

New member
Aug 13, 2008
15
0
0
Too many?? Can there really be too much of something awesome?? Lol but seriously I think that it can remain kind of a quiet thing; unless you are going to get married. When/IF I get married I'm going to ask my wife for her roster of guys, and I'll have no problem telling her mine. I know she won't care because the kind of woman I marry won't care about that kind of trivial stuff. I'm at like 12 or 13 right now myself and I have met people who think that that's not many at all; and people who think its way too many and that I'm a huge man whore. But if you want a totally open and honest relationship and the topic comes up I think its healthy to talk about it-especially if you are going to get married like I said earlier.
 

arsenicCatnip

New member
Jan 2, 2010
1,923
0
0
TheDuckbunny said:
lilmisspotatoes said:
shadowstriker86 said:
lilmisspotatoes said:
shadowstriker86 said:
For guys, there is none.

For a girl, 3. That's when the tread starts to wear.
Double standard much? Why is it that when a guy sleeps with a ton of people he's a hero, but a girl doing it is a slut?

I hope you're joking, but that's not funny.

Really, the number doesn't matter to me so long as a. there was proper protection involved, b. my partner's not sleeping with anyone other than me when we're together.
you know why he's a hero? because a guy has to work to get a chick. not the same for a chick.

even if a guy is an 11/10, he still has to work and put effort into getting a chick. If a girl is even a 4/10, she just has to wait a little bit later but doesn't have to work at all. Thus the reason for the double standard.
I will call BS on this reasoning, and leave it at that. The standard should be the same for women and men, because girls have to work just as hard as guys do to get laid.
This was called for.
http://img.moronail.net/img/8/7/2387.jpg

All in good fun though, I don't agree in the least.
The whole double-standard kind of pisses me off. Most guys really don't realize how hard girls work to be viewed as attractive, and thus to get dates. We already work twice as hard as guys do for less money and less recognition.

[small]For the love of God. I'm stopping here, lol. No need to soapbox over it all.[/small]
 

Arcticflame

New member
Nov 7, 2006
1,063
0
0
lilmisspotatoes said:
The whole double-standard kind of pisses me off. Most guys really don't realize how hard girls work to be viewed as attractive, and thus to get dates. We already work twice as hard as guys do for less money and less recognition.

[small]For the love of God. I'm stopping here, lol. No need to soapbox over it all.[/small]
Now I'm offended. I work just as hard as any girl does to get paid.

CEO and Executive level stuff you may have a point. But low/mid range pay there is little to no difference between guys and girls.

And really, working hard to be viewed as attractive doesn't really wash with me. Simply because I prefer casually dressed, no make up on women. I'm not saying I prefer somebody who doesn't make an effort at all, but a complete makeover every morning is.. not what I find attractive at all.

But then that's a personal taste thing I guess.
 

Feller1948

New member
Aug 13, 2008
15
0
0
lilmisspotatoes said:
TheDuckbunny said:
lilmisspotatoes said:
shadowstriker86 said:
lilmisspotatoes said:
shadowstriker86 said:
For guys, there is none.

For a girl, 3. That's when the tread starts to wear.
Double standard much? Why is it that when a guy sleeps with a ton of people he's a hero, but a girl doing it is a slut?

I hope you're joking, but that's not funny.

Really, the number doesn't matter to me so long as a. there was proper protection involved, b. my partner's not sleeping with anyone other than me when we're together.
you know why he's a hero? because a guy has to work to get a chick. not the same for a chick.

even if a guy is an 11/10, he still has to work and put effort into getting a chick. If a girl is even a 4/10, she just has to wait a little bit later but doesn't have to work at all. Thus the reason for the double standard.
I will call BS on this reasoning, and leave it at that. The standard should be the same for women and men, because girls have to work just as hard as guys do to get laid.
This was called for.
http://img.moronail.net/img/8/7/2387.jpg

All in good fun though, I don't agree in the least.
The whole double-standard kind of pisses me off. Most guys really don't realize how hard girls work to be viewed as attractive, and thus to get dates. We already work twice as hard as guys do for less money and less recognition.

[small]For the love of God. I'm stopping here, lol. No need to soapbox over it all.[/small]
Women do NOT earn less then men do at most jobs, that is a lie. If that was true give me one reason why every employer in the country wouldn't fire every male worker and replace them with female workers. Most women take more leave then men do. So a lot of women get paid less UPFRONT but it balances out when you factor in benefits and leave pay. This is economic fact. And even if it was true, who cares?? Young people get paid less than older people is that wrong? No its because of experience. Thats why a lot of companies love workers between tha ages of 17-24; they can pay them less. However once you gain more experience you can demand more money. Ok there Im done just had to say that; totally off topic.
 

arsenicCatnip

New member
Jan 2, 2010
1,923
0
0
Feller1948 said:
lilmisspotatoes said:
TheDuckbunny said:
lilmisspotatoes said:
shadowstriker86 said:
lilmisspotatoes said:
shadowstriker86 said:
For guys, there is none.

For a girl, 3. That's when the tread starts to wear.
Double standard much? Why is it that when a guy sleeps with a ton of people he's a hero, but a girl doing it is a slut?

I hope you're joking, but that's not funny.

Really, the number doesn't matter to me so long as a. there was proper protection involved, b. my partner's not sleeping with anyone other than me when we're together.
you know why he's a hero? because a guy has to work to get a chick. not the same for a chick.

even if a guy is an 11/10, he still has to work and put effort into getting a chick. If a girl is even a 4/10, she just has to wait a little bit later but doesn't have to work at all. Thus the reason for the double standard.
I will call BS on this reasoning, and leave it at that. The standard should be the same for women and men, because girls have to work just as hard as guys do to get laid.
This was called for.
http://img.moronail.net/img/8/7/2387.jpg

All in good fun though, I don't agree in the least.
The whole double-standard kind of pisses me off. Most guys really don't realize how hard girls work to be viewed as attractive, and thus to get dates. We already work twice as hard as guys do for less money and less recognition.

[small]For the love of God. I'm stopping here, lol. No need to soapbox over it all.[/small]
Women do NOT earn less then men do at most jobs, that is a lie. If that was true give me one reason why every employer in the country wouldn't fire every male worker and replace them with female workers. Most women take more leave then men do. So a lot of women get paid less UPFRONT but it balances out when you factor in benefits and leave pay. This is economic fact. And even if it was true, who cares?? Young people get paid less than older people is that wrong? No its because of experience. Thats why a lot of companies love workers between tha ages of 17-24; they can pay them less. However once you gain more experience you can demand more money. Ok there Im done just had to say that; totally off topic.
Yeah, I'm not continuing this argument because I totally led off-topic. And I'll concede some of it. But I stick by what I've said. Girls work just as hard to get guys to notice them, and the double-standard crap about partners should stop.
 

Feller1948

New member
Aug 13, 2008
15
0
0
lilmisspotatoes said:
Feller1948 said:
lilmisspotatoes said:
TheDuckbunny said:
lilmisspotatoes said:
shadowstriker86 said:
lilmisspotatoes said:
shadowstriker86 said:
For guys, there is none.

For a girl, 3. That's when the tread starts to wear.
Double standard much? Why is it that when a guy sleeps with a ton of people he's a hero, but a girl doing it is a slut?

I hope you're joking, but that's not funny.

Really, the number doesn't matter to me so long as a. there was proper protection involved, b. my partner's not sleeping with anyone other than me when we're together.
you know why he's a hero? because a guy has to work to get a chick. not the same for a chick.

even if a guy is an 11/10, he still has to work and put effort into getting a chick. If a girl is even a 4/10, she just has to wait a little bit later but doesn't have to work at all. Thus the reason for the double standard.
I will call BS on this reasoning, and leave it at that. The standard should be the same for women and men, because girls have to work just as hard as guys do to get laid.
This was called for.
http://img.moronail.net/img/8/7/2387.jpg

All in good fun though, I don't agree in the least.
The whole double-standard kind of pisses me off. Most guys really don't realize how hard girls work to be viewed as attractive, and thus to get dates. We already work twice as hard as guys do for less money and less recognition.

[small]For the love of God. I'm stopping here, lol. No need to soapbox over it all.[/small]
Women do NOT earn less then men do at most jobs, that is a lie. If that was true give me one reason why every employer in the country wouldn't fire every male worker and replace them with female workers. Most women take more leave then men do. So a lot of women get paid less UPFRONT but it balances out when you factor in benefits and leave pay. This is economic fact. And even if it was true, who cares?? Young people get paid less than older people is that wrong? No its because of experience. Thats why a lot of companies love workers between tha ages of 17-24; they can pay them less. However once you gain more experience you can demand more money. Ok there Im done just had to say that; totally off topic.
Yeah, I'm not continuing this argument because I totally led off-topic. And I'll concede some of it. But I stick by what I've said. Girls work just as hard to get guys to notice them, and the double-standard crap about partners should stop.
Yes I agree, but it will always be there. I personally think it is easier for any moderately attractive women to go into a bar and take a guy home than vice versa. Women usually have more options then men do. One thin I have learned tho is this. Men try to dress nice to impress women, women dress nice to look better than other women. Also when men walk into a room they notice the women first, when women walk into a room they also notice the women first; to gauge competition.
 

Feller1948

New member
Aug 13, 2008
15
0
0
As Barney Stinson from How I Met Your Mother said "Sex is fun!" or "Too many?? Yea cause there can be too many of something awesome. Hey Babe Ruth! Easy big fella lets not hit too many homers." lol love it.
 

Feller1948

New member
Aug 13, 2008
15
0
0
Ok well I gtg, have to go teach a class in 45 minutes. College writing...yay. Have a good day all...err night I guess I dunno its 3pm Monday March 29th here. Later
 

Dark Angel Warlord

New member
Mar 20, 2010
213
0
0
well i was raised kinda old fashioned so i didnt date much or been with that many women but you shouldnt be a manwhore meaning u sleep with lots of women

ive been with 5 women total
 

WhiteTigerShiro

New member
Sep 26, 2008
2,366
0
0
To me it's less about how many partners she's had in the past, and more about how smart she's been about it. I'd rather date a girl who's had sex with a thousand guys, but has no STDs and no kids than date a girl who's only had sex with a handful of guys and has kids and/or STDs. So basically, it's less about where she's been and what she's done and more about her current condition.
 

geldonyetich

New member
Aug 2, 2006
3,715
0
0
For most people, one sexual partner is too many. Unless they've been sterilized, in which case go nuts.

Thy seed ends here!
 

teisjm

New member
Mar 3, 2009
3,561
0
0
Well, for my sake, a girl could've been with as many otehr guys before me as she wanted. heck she may have learned a thing or two along the way that'll benefit our sex life.

I'd care about a different number, how many previous boyfriends have you cheated on?

And if some of those previous guys she had sex with was my friends, it would prolly be a no-go, it would be awkward to date yoru freinds ex. If it was a one night thing, and my friend didn't mind though, i might be willing to ignore that though.

But yeah, i don't think girls who had lots of partners are sluts, only if they cheated, and the same goes for guys, though i dunno what the male equivilent word for slut is, man-slut perhaps?
 

bluemistake2

New member
Sep 25, 2008
329
0
0
PrimoThePro said:
Well, I don't see a reason to find out. They're with me now, and there must be some reason I started dating them.
If I did ask, I wouldn't care about the number. If it's 500, then um... that's nice? Just means she has alot... ALOT... Of experience.
lol this made me think of jenna haze :S
 

bluemistake2

New member
Sep 25, 2008
329
0
0
sorry for double posting but...
lilmisspotatoes said:
shadowstriker86 said:
For guys, there is none.

For a girl, 3. That's when the tread starts to wear.
Double standard much? Why is it that when a guy sleeps with a ton of people he's a hero, but a girl doing it is a slut?

I hope you're joking, but that's not funny.

Really, the number doesn't matter to me so long as a. there was proper protection involved, b. my partner's not sleeping with anyone other than me when we're together.
I believe that this is a reproductive thing if a man sleeps with many women he reproduces a lot more (or at least chance) then when a woman sleeps with many men
 

Silver_Shade

New member
Mar 3, 2010
86
0
0
Mr. Mike said:
Well very recently I broke number 1, but that was largely because I'd begun to lose interest anyways and we've since broken up.

presidentjlh said:
z(ombie)fan said:
lacktheknack said:
Two.

Yeah, I'm one of those freaks who actually believes in virginity until marriage. Don't try to convince me otherwise, people have already tried (and failed).
same
here
same
And yes, same here. Friends make fun of me for it, but what the hey, I can be old-fashioned if I want.
We should start a club!

And no, I can't explain why, it's just the way I am. Or rather, I could try to explain, but it would take a very long time and probably end up sounding differently than I mean it.

OT: I agree heartily with the three rules list in the opening post. I don't like knowing anything. It's far too easy for me to picture things in my head, which bothers me.

Besides, it's obviously in the past for a reason.

If a significant other has something that they feel is important to tell/ask me, I'm happy to listen and talk about it, but I pretty much never initiate the discussion.