Julianking93 said:
Simple implication is just fine, honestly.
Anything else just either seems gratuitous or humorous.
You mean kind of like the VIOLENCE?
I mean, how many games did the game developers of the world need to go through before they hit that "magic mark" that DIDN'T land the violence in their videogames in the land of the gratutious and/or humourous?
Come to think of it, only a depressingly few game titles actually nails it when it comes to violence that doesn't strike people as gratitous or humourous (as most of you probably know, videogames still can't get enough of exploding heads, torrential rain of blood and bisected human bodies about as durable as wet toilet paper).
But hey, at least some developers are TRYING with MULTIPLE EFFORTS to make it all realistic right?
The question is; why not experiment more with sexual content? Despite the plethora of cheesy pornographic games that most people could even barely get ahold of, the matter is pretty unexplored (for your typical hypocritical reasons in a "violence making Peter Jacksons Braindead look tame in front of "the children" is okay, but an exposed female nipple will scar them for life"-kind of way).
It could probably be done in a variety of ways, if the censors weren't being so uptight when it comes to sex. I mean game developers would probably LOVE to put games on the more "mainstream" market featuring both romantic and sexual content (according to the laws of the average corporate drone brain, money can be made of things that feature sex in one way or another).
But due to restrictions from obnoxious moralists and "holier than thou"-idiots (along with incompetent parents who simply can't be bothered to control what kind of games their underage children purchase), any exploration in the realm of "sex in games" is being pretty hampered in the mainstream market.
Which is kind of a shame really. I mean, what happened to this lovely yearning for exploration? That drive that make men paint paintigs or sculpt statues never made before? Or making people ask what's beyond the horizon and actually getting their arses out of their seats and explore for themselves?
Of course it's difficult, but it sure as hell won't get any easier when moralist scumbags constantly try to spoil our adult fun by yelling "SOMEBODY PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN!" in our ears all the fucking time.
My suggestion? A reasonable compromise! Let game developers go nuts with sexual content (hurr, hurr "nuts") and maybe succeed in nailing that "magic mark" that makes it all seem realistic. But! Make sure the game comes with some kind of code-lock that requires the player to be of appropriate age in order to placate the moralist parents with their "impressionable children" of the world.
That way Mr. and Mrs. Stephens won't have to worry that little Timmy (age: 10) is going to be "exposed" to any digitally rendered nipples on that digital prostitute he's in the process of gleefully cutting to pieces with a chainsaw in your average Grand Theft Auto title.
So to all you doubters out there: I know that it might seem cheesy right now with sex in games, but you have to understand that there's a reason behind the cheesyness, and that is coming from outside pressure from moralists who make it difficult for game developers to market games that feature sexual content in the mainstream arena of business.