voorhees123 said:
Internet Kraken said:
voorhees123 said:
Madara XIII said:
voorhees123 said:
If you are not a donor then you are not allowed to receive donor organs. Seems fair to me. Why can't that not be a law? Maybe they should make everyone a donor by law, but you have to opt out. If you decide you do not want to donate, then you are screwed if you need a transplant.
What about people who can't donate organs due to their frail state or failing? Should we deny them an organ?
Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeah NO. There's a reason BS like this isn't implemented. Honestly let people decide how to distribute THEIR body parts.
They would be on donor list but would be unable to donate. Way i see it is if you are unwilling to donate your organs, why should you be allowed to have someone else's?
Becoming a donor is supposed to be a charitable thing you do out of the kindness of your heart. Not something you are forced to do because of a legal obligation. By your logic, everyone should also have to give blood in order to receive blood transplants. People have a right to keep their body the way they want it. I am uncomfortable with the idea of having my organs harvested for medical reasons. It's just a personal issue. Why should I be denied an organ transplant just because of this?
Honestly, the idea of forcing people to have their bodies cut open when they die just seems wrong.
So you feel that its ok to deny others your organs and life, but its a different matter if you need an organ? That is just idiotic. If you do not want to donate an organ, why should you be allowed to recieive one?
In my opinion, if I pay (either through private insurance or taking part in the tax payment) for medical care, then should I be denied care even though I've given the pay from my blood and sweat to the hospital? Sure, it might be selfish to not become a donator. But are you suggesting that only the truly altruistic should have the right to good health, or in a broader spectrum, a place in society? Cause that seems like the picture you're painting. We're born with life, and born with the rights to it.
When somebody donates an organ, unless they donate it to a specific person, it's donated to the hospitals. And hospitals are then entitled to use these to those who pay their share to get help, whether they're scum or not. Isn't that what we all want? To be treated equally regardless of outlooks on life?
If a man must be forced to give his organs to have the right to proper health care, we might as well force people who don't give money to charity to give it. Wait, where have I heard that before? Oh, right, it's called communism.
If you disagree with me, fine, I respect your opinion. This is just my perspective. You're welcome to correct me if I've made any fatal mistakes here. (And to any communists, I'm not saying that your political views are wrong. I just prefer a different kind of society.)