I can see clearly now MWII is gone!

Recommended Videos

Doctor Glocktor

New member
Aug 1, 2009
802
0
0
Ah, PC gamers. Because a game isn't exactly the way you like it, it is completely gone, eh? I'm more than 90% sure that they are focusing on making the console version great is because of PC pirates. You guys have nobody but yourselves to blame for that.
 

joe182

New member
Feb 18, 2005
395
0
0
theSovietConnection said:
joe182 said:
Biggest problem I have with it is the "experimental" price hike. As soon as I found out about that, the game was only going to be purchased used.
Trust me, I understand your concern, but;
A) Most shops are selling it at £45, not £55.
and B) Honestly, the singleplayer is worth that much alone. It may have only taken me just under 5 hours to complete, but my god, it's epic
 

Kermi

Elite Member
Nov 7, 2007
2,538
0
41
orannis62 said:
I'll address this to all three of you: one very good reason to not get the 360 version is that, for no adequate reason, they're making it so you can't be in a Party in all but 3 gametypes.
For anyone interested in fair competition, this is a good thing. I can't tell you how many times I've had a game of Halo 3 screwed up because douchebags in private chat help their buddies on the other team.
 

Syphonz

New member
Aug 22, 2008
1,255
0
0
D_987 said:
orangebandguy said:
Looks great, but I hope every level isn't in the Snow. Might get a bit boring if it's just the same environment.
They aren't.

Its.. Its BEAUTIFUL! At last it seems they've recaptured the feel of BF2!
 

dragonnewby

New member
Mar 31, 2009
103
0
0
joe182 said:
jigs160 said:
? D
- 9v9 only- You'd rather had a 64 player match where you die every 2 seconds?


I really dont see peoples problems with MW2. Its an amazing game, and well worty the price for the single player alone, let alone the multiplayer. People need to stop talking all this shit about a game they haven't even played yet... Dont let it become the new popular thing to hate.
Just to clarify, I've played through the campaign at a friends who 'acquired' the game early.
First of all, pirated campaign doesn't mean the multiplayer will be good and second. 9v9 is GOOD? I would accept 24-player, but 18? what the hell...
 

theSovietConnection

Survivor, VDNKh Station
Jan 14, 2009
2,418
0
0
joe182 said:
theSovietConnection said:
joe182 said:
Biggest problem I have with it is the "experimental" price hike. As soon as I found out about that, the game was only going to be purchased used.
Trust me, I understand your concern, but;
A) Most shops are selling it at £45, not £55.
and B) Honestly, the singleplayer is worth that much alone. It may have only taken me just under 5 hours to complete, but my god, it's epic
Meh, either way I plan on picking it up used. I will be getting it though, little doubt about that.
 

Avatar Roku

New member
Jul 9, 2008
6,169
0
0
Kermi said:
orannis62 said:
I'll address this to all three of you: one very good reason to not get the 360 version is that, for no adequate reason, they're making it so you can't be in a Party in all but 3 gametypes.
For anyone interested in fair competition, this is a good thing. I can't tell you how many times I've had a game of Halo 3 screwed up because douchebags in private chat help their buddies on the other team.
You know, I've never doubted that Party Chat isn't a fit for every game. Gears of War, for example, is a game in which cheating is very easy when using Party Chat. But we're not talking about Gears, or Halo, or Rainbow Six, or what have you, we're talking about Call of Duty. And in Call of Duty, it's very difficult to engineer people, especially people in a Party, being on opposite teams, and impossible to do reliably. The only other kind of cheating with a Party would be someone who's dead talking to someone who's alive (which, combined with the Ghost Cam given to dead players in Gears, is what makes it so easy to cheat in that game). Thing is, this is only a problem in Search and Destroy, since that's the only game in which dead players can't talk to their team through Game Chat (it's the only game where you only have one life), and even then, what you can do with that is limited, since dead players are stuck seeing only what surviving members of their team can see. Even if that wasn't true, and dead players were given a ghost cam, they aren't getting rid of this for only Search and Destroy, they're getting rid of it for every gametype other than Free For All and Mercenary Team Deathmatch, which makes no sense. Hell, even if your logic was correct and they did this because some massive number of people I was unaware of were going on opposite teams and feeding intel, why allow it for those two games? If that was true, it'd be just as possible to do in MTDM, It just shows a complete lack of thought or reason on IW's part.
 

rabidmidget

New member
Apr 18, 2008
2,117
0
0
I'm getting MW2, but after seeing this video I'm going add BF:BC2 to my ever-growing list of games to buy, right under bioshock 2
 

maddawg IAJI

I prefer the term "Zomguard"
Feb 12, 2009
7,840
0
0
Proably not. I didn't really enjoy Bad company when it came out and as a Console gamer I found MW to be far more superior. Besides, the single player for MW2 looks interesting and I don't wanna pass that up.
 

ElephantGuts

New member
Jul 9, 2008
3,520
0
0
Well I'll be getting both games because I have the money but BF:BC2 does indeed look very sexy and I am quite excited for it. As a long time Battlefield fan I was already looking forward to the game but I'm glad to see more people catching onto it and the series getting even more recognition, as it surely deserves it.
 

WorldCritic

New member
Apr 13, 2009
3,021
0
0
So sorry but people who refuse to get MW2 now are mostly pissed off about multiplayer changes, and well, I'm not a multiplayer gamer at all. I play for the main game, so yeah, I'm getting MW2.
 

Chicago Ted

New member
Jan 13, 2009
3,463
0
0
I've been waiting for BF:BC2 a lot longer then MW2. The destruction and openess of the maps is something I can't wait to play with friends on.
 

Caliostro

Headhunter
Jan 23, 2008
3,253
0
0
JimmyBassatti said:
We don't have that on the console version. To me, it just sounds like Infinity Ward is trying to make all the ports equally the same, and that's a good thing. The console gamers tend to always get second-hand ports, with a million features gone. I'm glad that the game is shaping up to be pretty close to it's console brothers.
Say, there are kids in Africa that lost their limbs to landmines. So we're going to cut yours off so it's fair.

Do you have a house? Some people don't, so we're taking yours!

Sound fair? We're just making it equal to everyone by picking the lowest common denominator and fucking everyone else till they're at the same level! Why bother trying to improve what's wrong? Just make sure it's wrong for EVERYONE and it's fair!
 

Daedalus1942

New member
Jun 26, 2009
4,169
0
0
D_987 said:
orangebandguy said:
Looks great, but I hope every level isn't in the Snow. Might get a bit boring if it's just the same environment.
They aren't.

Wow... I thought gra[hics of the first one were great...This looks like a real war battle.
In my opinion BF's always been better than CoD, and this just proves it yet again.
 

Gxas

New member
Sep 4, 2008
3,187
0
0
Caliostro said:
But does this game have the continuation of the story from CoD:4 that MW2 has?

If no, then I still want to play MW2.
 

Cowabungaa

New member
Feb 10, 2008
10,806
0
0
D_987 said:
orangebandguy said:
Looks great, but I hope every level isn't in the Snow. Might get a bit boring if it's just the same environment.
They aren't.

I liked the MW2 multiplayer vids, like them a lot actually, but this takes that and beats it a thousandfold. Looks a ton more fun online than MW2. I'm pretty sure MW2's singleplayer is a lot better than BC's singleplayer though.
 

Ace of Spades

New member
Jul 12, 2008
3,303
0
0
lacktheknack said:
Ace of Spades said:
That's what happens to PC gamers. They always get screwed. Turning my back on the PC was the best decision I've ever made.
With the MASSIVE exceptions of Mirror's Edge, any RTS, half the FPSs, and Civilization, obviously.
As long as you're willing to wait a few extra months for some and fiddle with problems for the others.
 

Ace of Spades

New member
Jul 12, 2008
3,303
0
0
Caliostro said:
Ace of Spades said:
That's what happens to PC gamers. They always get screwed. Turning my back on the PC was the best decision I've ever made.
I don't get this mentality. To my mind it's like saying "I hated it when my legs hurt after running... So I cut them off!".
It's more like my running shoes made my feet hurt while running, so I switched to different ones and burned the originals.
 

Pillypill

New member
Aug 7, 2009
506
0
0
i didn't like BC1, so i'm a bit buggered aren't i?
I'm not sure why everyone is so mad at MW2, i can understand why everyone hates IW now, screwing it up for our PC gamer friends. although..... i've not kept up to date with MW2, so maybe i've missed announcements, or gameplay vids that have turned everyone else off it.