I can't believe he just said that
- Thread starter rileyrulesu
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Haha, I like how people have so much hate and rip on things and then drop their original thinking when someone who sounds smart argues with you.hobo_welf said:
You first stated that the beatles had NO talent and were irritating and useless. You then followed by pointing out their good points. XD
Priceless.
Well, we've come to some sort of agreement, then?hobo_welf said:
I'll assume we have, shake your hand and wish you a jolly good day, sir! Glad we could debate this like civilized people.
By that logic I'd be guilty of the same thing. My first post could easily be translated as "OMG BEATLES ARE GOD LOLOLOL", but then in the follow-up post I went on to say that they were indeed overrated, and pointed out some other bad aspects.Lil_Hank93 said:
Just goes to show that if someone comes at you vulgarly it will only incite further arguement, but if someone orders their points and speaks to you rationally, it'll get you a lot farther.Lil_Hank93 said:
Also I seem to remember stating that the Beatles made a wonderful contribution to the world of music. It's just too bad they didn't make any good music doing it. Then again I generally hate pop music, so what do I know...
Wow, you have no ear for talent whatsoever. Congratulations.hobo_welf said:
OT:
The Beatles is one of the most popular bands of all time. Everyones heard about the Beatles
Here we go to the age old comment "Ringo sucked." I would have to respectfully disagree with that.Clashero said:
In recording, what would many times take Paul and John many takes to get a song down, Ringo had his part perfect in one. It doesn't matter how simple it is, that is good.
Secondly, he never messed up live. I can't say the same for Neil Peart (my hero), Carl Palmer, or Keith Moon.
Thirdly, he kept a beat. That makes him a good drummer. It doesn't matter how technical you can play, if you can't keep a steady tempo, your a bad drummer. Plain and simple. If you can't keep a tempo, that is when you get fired and the band buys a drum machine. (hyperbole)
Ringo is by no means a technical drummer, and I am sure many other people could play most of his licks. But, he most certainly was not an awful drummer.
Alright, allow me to correct: he was the least impressive (?) Beatle. He was, er... comparatively bad. That is, John, Paul and to a lesser degree George were irreplaceable, but no one would've noticed if they switched Ringo for any drummer who looked like him.cah318ery7 said:
Now we have two often seen groups here in their native habitat. On the surface, these amazing creatures look almost identical, but they suddenly change when instigated, observe:
"BEATLES!"
*squabble squabble squabble*
You see, these magnificent beasts come in two distinct forms cleverly engineered to impress mates and peers.
The first kind is the enthusiast, this one loves the Beatles, and can't stop mentioning how they were the best band ever. They believe that music died with John Lennon and that if a band was formed in the 80s or later, then it doesn't actually exist (bar a few), a truly interesting breed. They use this to appear as though they have good taste, which occasionally they do, but they are herd animals and often incapable of surviving away from their pack.
The second kind, the defector is almost the polar opposite, they will often mention how the band ripped of Chuck Berry and Elvis, which though an interesting hypothesis show's a serious lack of knowledge. The kind we find here, the Nerdanus Defectus often believe that music released before they were born must be terrible and disregard it instantly, preferring metal/techno to classic rock, which isn't a bad survival trait, I'm sure. Often this species can sustain relations with others of it's kind, but due to it's natural predatorial instincts, it finds it difficult to deal with those outside it's own kind, notably enthusiasts who find the defector aggressive and thickheaded but also other breeds of defector, such as the Bimbo Defectus a species that spends most of it's time enjoying "the charts" (charts are a simplified version of modern music, often replacing musical ability with Jewish words).
There is also a superior species, noted for the individuality and strength of each individual member and for their ability to constructively work together, these are the efficionados. They maintain their own thought-out opinion, often that the Beatles are good, but that they prefer other music personally. This likes to observe accurately the current scene, but also research what the past has to offer. The closest to a true sentient animal, they have an egalitarian social structure, with the most skilled observers and thinkers rising to the top. An interesting note is that the other species we can see roaming this area, the Hip Hoppity Bopper, known to be somewhat ignorant of music outside there own realm (often house, hip hop, electro) is one of the most respectful, rarely criticising music they don't know and often mentioning how blues, jazz and rock are responsible for most of modern music, with artist such as Chuck Berry, Louis Armstrong, Ray Charles and even the Beatles to thank.
"BEATLES!"
*squabble squabble squabble*
You see, these magnificent beasts come in two distinct forms cleverly engineered to impress mates and peers.
The first kind is the enthusiast, this one loves the Beatles, and can't stop mentioning how they were the best band ever. They believe that music died with John Lennon and that if a band was formed in the 80s or later, then it doesn't actually exist (bar a few), a truly interesting breed. They use this to appear as though they have good taste, which occasionally they do, but they are herd animals and often incapable of surviving away from their pack.
The second kind, the defector is almost the polar opposite, they will often mention how the band ripped of Chuck Berry and Elvis, which though an interesting hypothesis show's a serious lack of knowledge. The kind we find here, the Nerdanus Defectus often believe that music released before they were born must be terrible and disregard it instantly, preferring metal/techno to classic rock, which isn't a bad survival trait, I'm sure. Often this species can sustain relations with others of it's kind, but due to it's natural predatorial instincts, it finds it difficult to deal with those outside it's own kind, notably enthusiasts who find the defector aggressive and thickheaded but also other breeds of defector, such as the Bimbo Defectus a species that spends most of it's time enjoying "the charts" (charts are a simplified version of modern music, often replacing musical ability with Jewish words).
There is also a superior species, noted for the individuality and strength of each individual member and for their ability to constructively work together, these are the efficionados. They maintain their own thought-out opinion, often that the Beatles are good, but that they prefer other music personally. This likes to observe accurately the current scene, but also research what the past has to offer. The closest to a true sentient animal, they have an egalitarian social structure, with the most skilled observers and thinkers rising to the top. An interesting note is that the other species we can see roaming this area, the Hip Hoppity Bopper, known to be somewhat ignorant of music outside there own realm (often house, hip hop, electro) is one of the most respectful, rarely criticising music they don't know and often mentioning how blues, jazz and rock are responsible for most of modern music, with artist such as Chuck Berry, Louis Armstrong, Ray Charles and even the Beatles to thank.
I'm not going to judge you for it. Cats are selfish, and feel entitled to stick their wrinkly sphincters in your face. If you ask me...cat has it coming.nicholaxxx said:
Wow, your long introduction overhyped this thread almost as much as the Beatles have been overhyped.