BiscuitTrouser said:Mogg01 said:This is, in fact, completely wrong, which is the problem with your entire argument. Not only can we not know both momentum and position perfectly, but particles cannot have them both perfectly defined at the same time. If you had actually read the article, you would have known that. I can prove it to you, and the article in fact does, but only if you've taken some fairly advanced math and physics, which it is clear you have not. For further research that you will not do, look up either wave/particle duality or the dual slit experiment. Both will give strong evidence that the universe is not deterministic, but rather is based on probability. Which means, in short, that you can not predict anything perfectly. Ever.BiscuitTrouser said:I figure that regardless of what we can know or not know, that partical DOES have a speed and a location, regardless of if we can know it or not. It still follows laws.
OR else every tiny ounce of free will is because of the tiny leeway in location or momentun, a margin of uncertainty if you will, as small as a plank... That seems very miniscule.
I am not, in fact, an atheist, I just hate people who do no research on a subject then claim that they have proved something profound. Seriously, if it was that easy, don't you think physicists would have mentioned it already?
Im actually aware of the duel slit experiment. It proved a single photon was in two places at once. No need to jump down my throat for asking a single question. I expected to be argued with. I didnt come here to preach like a prophet. I came here to be proved wrong so i could explore a more accurate view and better my own knowlegde. Or to reason a better solution. I actually didnt consider that could prove the universe is based on probability. And after realising this and reading your article i see it is. Tnanks, actually its a good read. You seemed to make an account JUST for this, and to be honest, im flattered. Its nice to see smart people actually try and educate others rather than insult or belittle. Ill revise my thinking.
Yes, clearly the account that was made a year and a half ago was made just for you. And I wouldn't have jumped down your throat about this, but the same points were raised, and you didn't do the research they suggested. Next time, do the research, and then people won't have to tell you you're wrong about everything you've said. Repeatedly.