codisthebest said:
just wondering what games coming out in the future could take down COD in you pinion if battelfield 3 fails to do so.
'#When# battlefield 3 fails to take down cod' you mean?
yes, it actually is inevitable because all the cod fan-boys will continue to play cod and all the battlefield fan-boys will tell them how the so-called new gen of shooter is far superior
and all the mmo fan-boys will smirk at the fact their experience is not dependant on the whims of the schizophrenic backstabbing metric we call 'ping' nearly as much as shooter fans are when their bullets make a clear connect on their screen but whiz off and make a pattern like mickey mouse silhouette on the wall behind the intended target on their kill cam and you get called a horse loving noob face or some such ill contrived moronic insult, why? because that's what people do
( yes, ok table top gamers we know you have the most realistic physics based luck system, and have no ping issues, but do you has 1080p !?!?!? NO!!! < simulated idiot nerd-rage. )
they love to promote their own experience over any other because they either haven't seen the depth of yours or want to convince themselves that their purchase and method of wasting their life was the wisest possible choice in their 'unique' situation ( cough mind )
so.. yah that's why one franchise doesn't simply gobble up all the others
people get immersed in one style of play, or ui, or mechanic, or whatever and generally stick with what they know so they don't have to relearn everything and be called a horse loving noob face in several other games because they don't have the one-shot kill insta-gib weapon / attack combo that ignores physics, time, logic, ping and general game balance down yet.
( i'm looking at you stealthed commando sniper-bot weapon / kill-streak / attachment / perk / shiny collectable item of satanic doom )
enter the silver lined bright side of the equation:
more game developers, more games, more choice so you can pick and choose what experience suits you and even what price bracket you want to be in
you wouldn't get that if one game absorbs the entire fan-base of everything
( you really don't want battlefield to be the only shooter, i promise you in 5-6 years you'd regret it because the game devs would get bored, tired and go 'urrrrrmmm.. so graphics update? what about a remote controlled bomb? meh, let's just re-skin it and give it a new title, and add some snow nobody plays the single-player anyway )
which is one thing mmo's tried desperately to do and ruined allot of triple a producing studios fan-base because they didn't have the time / money / inclination to fork out for their mmo sub and more new games which is why we have less and less pc market for games even though we have an ever growing market to feed because on the whole around 30 million mmo players would otherwise be playing pc games again and developers would push a ton of cash on it knowing they have a fertile soil to dump their money tree game seeds in
and as some / most.. of this post is borderline off-topic, i'll stop here!
i think my answer to this would be, for the sake of the shooter community, and perhaps gaming as a whole i hope none until it's so outdated it dies of normal game decay by ceasing to be relevant